Theorem spcimdv 2936

Description: Restricted specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
spcimdv.1	|- (ph -> A e. B)
spcimdv.2	|- ((ph /\ x = A) -> (ps -> ch))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
spcimdv	|- (ph -> (A.xps -> ch))

Distinct variable groups:   x,A   ph,x   ch,x

Allowed substitution hints:   ps(x)   B(x)

Proof of Theorem spcimdv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		spcimdv.2	. . . 4 |- ((ph /\ x = A) -> (ps -> ch))
2	1	ex 423	. . 3 |- (ph -> (x = A -> (ps -> ch)))
3	2	alrimiv 1631	. 2 |- (ph -> A.x(x = A -> (ps -> ch)))
4		spcimdv.1	. 2 |- (ph -> A e. B)
5		nfv 1619	. . 3 |- F/xch
6		nfcv 2489	. . 3 |- F/_xA
7	5, 6	spcimgft 2930	. 2 |- (A.x(x = A -> (ps -> ch)) -> (A e. B -> (A.xps -> ch)))
8	3, 4, 7	sylc 56	1 |- (ph -> (A.xps -> ch))

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 358  A.wal 1540   = wceq 1642   e. wcel 1710

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1546  ax-5 1557  ax-17 1616  ax-9 1654  ax-8 1675  ax-6 1729  ax-7 1734  ax-11 1746  ax-12 1925  ax-ext 2334

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 177  df-or 359  df-an 360  df-tru 1319  df-ex 1542  df-nf 1545  df-sb 1649  df-clab 2340  df-cleq 2346  df-clel 2349  df-nfc 2478  df-v 2861

This theorem is referenced by:  spcdv  2937  spcimedv  2938  rspcimdv  2956