Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next > Nearby theorems Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  resmpt2 GIF version

Theorem resmpt2 5725
 Description: Restriction of the mapping operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Dec-2013.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
resmpt2 ((𝐶𝐴𝐷𝐵) → ((𝑥𝐴, 𝑦𝐵𝐸) ↾ (𝐶 × 𝐷)) = (𝑥𝐶, 𝑦𝐷𝐸))
Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦   𝑥,𝐶,𝑦   𝑥,𝐷,𝑦
Allowed substitution hints:   𝐸(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem resmpt2
Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 resoprab2 5724 . 2 ((𝐶𝐴𝐷𝐵) → ({⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥𝐴𝑦𝐵) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐸)} ↾ (𝐶 × 𝐷)) = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥𝐶𝑦𝐷) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐸)})
2 df-mpt2 5639 . . 3 (𝑥𝐴, 𝑦𝐵𝐸) = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥𝐴𝑦𝐵) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐸)}
32reseq1i 4697 . 2 ((𝑥𝐴, 𝑦𝐵𝐸) ↾ (𝐶 × 𝐷)) = ({⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥𝐴𝑦𝐵) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐸)} ↾ (𝐶 × 𝐷))
4 df-mpt2 5639 . 2 (𝑥𝐶, 𝑦𝐷𝐸) = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥𝐶𝑦𝐷) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐸)}
51, 3, 43eqtr4g 2145 1 ((𝐶𝐴𝐷𝐵) → ((𝑥𝐴, 𝑦𝐵𝐸) ↾ (𝐶 × 𝐷)) = (𝑥𝐶, 𝑦𝐷𝐸))
 Colors of variables: wff set class Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 102   = wceq 1289   ∈ wcel 1438   ⊆ wss 2997   × cxp 4426   ↾ cres 4430  {coprab 5635   ↦ cmpt2 5636 This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 665  ax-5 1381  ax-7 1382  ax-gen 1383  ax-ie1 1427  ax-ie2 1428  ax-8 1440  ax-10 1441  ax-11 1442  ax-i12 1443  ax-bndl 1444  ax-4 1445  ax-14 1450  ax-17 1464  ax-i9 1468  ax-ial 1472  ax-i5r 1473  ax-ext 2070  ax-sep 3949  ax-pow 4001  ax-pr 4027 This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-3an 926  df-tru 1292  df-nf 1395  df-sb 1693  df-clab 2075  df-cleq 2081  df-clel 2084  df-nfc 2217  df-ral 2364  df-rex 2365  df-v 2621  df-un 3001  df-in 3003  df-ss 3010  df-pw 3427  df-sn 3447  df-pr 3448  df-op 3450  df-opab 3892  df-xp 4434  df-rel 4435  df-res 4440  df-oprab 5638  df-mpt2 5639 This theorem is referenced by:  ofmres  5889  divfnzn  9075
 Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator