Theorem bj-axsep2 33734

Description: Remove dependency on ax-12 2106 and ax-13 2301 from axsep2 5061 while shortening its proof. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-axsep2	⊢ ∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧   𝜑,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑧)

Proof of Theorem bj-axsep2

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elequ2 2064	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑧 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧))
2	1	anbi1d 620	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑧 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑)))
3	2	bibi2d 335	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑧 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑))))
4	3	albidv 1879	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑧 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑))))
5	4	exbidv 1880	. 2 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑧 → (∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ ∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑))))
6		ax-sep 5060	. 2 ⊢ ∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝜑))
7	5, 6	bj-chvarvv 33571	1 ⊢ ∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 198   ∧ wa 387  ∀wal 1505  ∃wex 1742

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1758  ax-4 1772  ax-5 1869  ax-6 1928  ax-7 1965  ax-9 2059  ax-sep 5060

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 199  df-an 388  df-ex 1743

This theorem is referenced by: (None)