Theorem sb6OLD 2276

Description: Obsolete version of sb6 2089 as of 7-Jul-2023. Equivalence for substitution. Compare Theorem 6.2 of [Quine] p. 40. Also proved as Lemmas 16 and 17 of [Tarski] p. 70. The implication "to the left", sb2vOLD 2093, also holds without a disjoint variable condition (sb2 2500). Theorem sb6f 2533 replaces the disjoint variable condition with a non-freeness hypothesis. Theorem sb4b 2495 replaces it with a distinctor antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 21-Sep-2018.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sb6OLD	⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem sb6OLD

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sb4vOLD 2092	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))
2		sb2vOLD 2093	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
3	1, 2	impbii 211	1 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208  ∀wal 1531  [wsb 2065

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1792  ax-4 1806  ax-5 1907  ax-6 1966  ax-7 2011

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-ex 1777  df-sb 2066

This theorem is referenced by: (None)