ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  ax-ext Structured version   GIF version

Axiom ax-ext 1928
Description: Axiom of Extensionality. It states that two sets are identical if they contain the same elements. Axiom 1 of [Crosilla] p. "Axioms of CZF and IZF" (with unnnecessary quantifiers removed).

Set theory can also be formulated with a single primitive predicate on top of traditional predicate calculus without equality. In that case the Axiom of Extensionality becomes (w(w xw y) → (x zy z)), and equality x = y is defined as w(w xw y). All of the usual axioms of equality then become theorems of set theory. See, for example, Axiom 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 8.

To use the above "equality-free" version of Extensionality with Metamath's logical axioms, we would rewrite ax-8 1344 through ax-16 1634 with equality expanded according to the above definition. Some of those axioms could be proved from set theory and would be redundant. Not all of them are redundant, since our axioms of predicate calculus make essential use of equality for the proper substitution that is a primitive notion in traditional predicate calculus. A study of such an axiomatization would be an interesting project for someone exploring the foundations of logic.

It is important to understand that strictly speaking, all of our set theory axioms are really schemes that represent an infinite number of actual axioms. This is inherent in the design of Metamath ("metavariable math"), which manipulates only metavariables. For example, the metavariable x in ax-ext 1928 can represent any actual variable v1, v2, v3,... . Distinct variable restrictions ($d) prevent us from substituting say v1 for both x and z. This is in contrast to typical textbook presentations that present actual axioms (except for axioms which involve wff metavariables). In practice, though, the theorems and proofs are essentially the same. The $d restrictions make each of the infinite axioms generated by the ax-ext 1928 scheme exactly logically equivalent to each other and in particular to the actual axiom of the textbook version. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)

Assertion
Ref Expression
ax-ext (z(z xz y) → x = y)
Distinct variable group:   x,y,z

Detailed syntax breakdown of Axiom ax-ext
StepHypRef Expression
1 vz . . . . 5 set z
2 vx . . . . 5 set x
31, 2wel 1343 . . . 4 wff z x
4 vy . . . . 5 set y
51, 4wel 1343 . . . 4 wff z y
63, 5wb 96 . . 3 wff (z xz y)
76, 1wal 1281 . 2 wff z(z xz y)
82, 4weq 1341 . 2 wff x = y
97, 8wi 4 1 wff (z(z xz y) → x = y)
Colors of variables: wff set class
This axiom is referenced by:  axext3  1929  dfcleq  1939
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator