Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > ceqsex | GIF version |
Description: Elimination of an existential quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 2-Mar-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2016.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
ceqsex.1 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 |
ceqsex.2 | ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V |
ceqsex.3 | ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
ceqsex | ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | ceqsex.1 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 | |
2 | ceqsex.3 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | |
3 | 2 | biimpa 294 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓) |
4 | 1, 3 | exlimi 1573 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓) |
5 | 2 | biimprcd 159 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑)) |
6 | 1, 5 | alrimi 1502 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑)) |
7 | ceqsex.2 | . . . 4 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V | |
8 | 7 | isseti 2694 | . . 3 ⊢ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴 |
9 | exintr 1613 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) → (∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) | |
10 | 6, 8, 9 | mpisyl 1422 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜓 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) |
11 | 4, 10 | impbii 125 | 1 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 103 ↔ wb 104 ∀wal 1329 = wceq 1331 Ⅎwnf 1436 ∃wex 1468 ∈ wcel 1480 Vcvv 2686 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 105 ax-ia2 106 ax-ia3 107 ax-5 1423 ax-gen 1425 ax-ie1 1469 ax-ie2 1470 ax-8 1482 ax-4 1487 ax-17 1506 ax-i9 1510 ax-ial 1514 ax-ext 2121 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 116 df-nf 1437 df-sb 1736 df-clab 2126 df-cleq 2132 df-clel 2135 df-v 2688 |
This theorem is referenced by: ceqsexv 2725 ceqsex2 2726 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |