| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: Inference eliminating two antecedents. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| pm2.61nii.1 | ⊢ (φ → (ψ → χ)) |
| pm2.61nii.2 | ⊢ (¬ φ → χ) |
| pm2.61nii.3 | ⊢ (¬ ψ → χ) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| pm2.61nii | ⊢ χ |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | pm2.61nii.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ (φ → (ψ → χ)) | |
| 2 | 1 | com12 11 | . . 3 ⊢ (ψ → (φ → χ)) |
| 3 | pm2.61nii.2 | . . 3 ⊢ (¬ φ → χ) | |
| 4 | 2, 3 | pm2.61d1 128 | . 2 ⊢ (ψ → χ) |
| 5 | pm2.61nii.3 | . 2 ⊢ (¬ ψ → χ) | |
| 6 | 4, 5 | pm2.61i 126 | 1 ⊢ χ |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: ¬ wn 2 → wi 3 |
| This theorem is referenced by: ecase 752 3ecase 921 prex 2776 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 4 ax-2 5 ax-3 6 ax-mp 7 |