Theorem sb4a 1923

Description: A version of sb4 2053 that doesn't require a distinctor antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2007.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sb4a	|- ([y / x]A.yph -> A.x(x = y -> ph))

Proof of Theorem sb4a

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sb1 1651	. 2 |- ([y / x]A.yph -> E.x(x = y /\ A.yph))
2		equs5a 1887	. 2 |- (E.x(x = y /\ A.yph) -> A.x(x = y -> ph))
3	1, 2	syl 15	1 |- ([y / x]A.yph -> A.x(x = y -> ph))

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 358  A.wal 1540  E.wex 1541  [wsb 1648

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1546  ax-5 1557  ax-17 1616  ax-9 1654  ax-8 1675  ax-6 1729  ax-11 1746

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 177  df-an 360  df-ex 1542  df-nf 1545  df-sb 1649

This theorem is referenced by:  sb6f  2039  hbsb2a  2041