ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  difjust GIF version

Theorem difjust 2946
Description: Soundness justification theorem for df-dif 2947. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 27-Apr-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jul-2011.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
difjust {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐵)} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑦𝐵)}
Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝑦,𝐴   𝑦,𝐵

Proof of Theorem difjust
Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 eleq1 2116 . . . 4 (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑥𝐴𝑧𝐴))
2 eleq1 2116 . . . . 5 (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑥𝐵𝑧𝐵))
32notbid 602 . . . 4 (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (¬ 𝑥𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝑧𝐵))
41, 3anbi12d 450 . . 3 (𝑥 = 𝑧 → ((𝑥𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐵) ↔ (𝑧𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑧𝐵)))
54cbvabv 2177 . 2 {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐵)} = {𝑧 ∣ (𝑧𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑧𝐵)}
6 eleq1 2116 . . . 4 (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝑧𝐴𝑦𝐴))
7 eleq1 2116 . . . . 5 (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝑧𝐵𝑦𝐵))
87notbid 602 . . . 4 (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (¬ 𝑧𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝑦𝐵))
96, 8anbi12d 450 . . 3 (𝑧 = 𝑦 → ((𝑧𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑧𝐵) ↔ (𝑦𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑦𝐵)))
109cbvabv 2177 . 2 {𝑧 ∣ (𝑧𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑧𝐵)} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑦𝐵)}
115, 10eqtri 2076 1 {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐵)} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑦𝐵)}
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3  wa 101   = wceq 1259  wcel 1409  {cab 2042
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 103  ax-ia2 104  ax-ia3 105  ax-in1 554  ax-in2 555  ax-io 640  ax-5 1352  ax-7 1353  ax-gen 1354  ax-ie1 1398  ax-ie2 1399  ax-8 1411  ax-10 1412  ax-11 1413  ax-i12 1414  ax-bndl 1415  ax-4 1416  ax-17 1435  ax-i9 1439  ax-ial 1443  ax-i5r 1444  ax-ext 2038
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 114  df-nf 1366  df-sb 1662  df-clab 2043  df-cleq 2049  df-clel 2052
This theorem is referenced by: (None)
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator