Theorem mopick2 1997

Description: "At most one" can show the existence of a common value. In this case we can infer existence of conjunction from a conjunction of existence, and it is one way to achieve the converse of 19.40 1536. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jul-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
mopick2	⊢ ((∃*𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)) → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))

Proof of Theorem mopick2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		hbmo1 1952	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃*𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥∃*𝑥𝜑)
2		hbe1 1398	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ∀𝑥∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
3	1, 2	hban 1453	. . 3 ⊢ ((∃*𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → ∀𝑥(∃*𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))
4		mopick 1992	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((∃*𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → (𝜑 → 𝜓))
5	4	ancld 312	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((∃*𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → (𝜑 → (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))
6	5	anim1d 323	. . . 4 ⊢ ((∃*𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒)))
7		df-3an 896	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒))
8	6, 7	syl6ibr 155	. . 3 ⊢ ((∃*𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)))
9	3, 8	eximdh 1516	. 2 ⊢ ((∃*𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → (∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)))
10	9	3impia 1110	1 ⊢ ((∃*𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)) → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 101   ∧ w3a 894  ∃wex 1395  ∃*wmo 1915

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 103  ax-ia2 104  ax-ia3 105  ax-io 638  ax-5 1350  ax-7 1351  ax-gen 1352  ax-ie1 1396  ax-ie2 1397  ax-8 1409  ax-10 1410  ax-11 1411  ax-i12 1412  ax-bndl 1413  ax-4 1414  ax-17 1433  ax-i9 1437  ax-ial 1441  ax-i5r 1442

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 114  df-3an 896  df-nf 1364  df-sb 1660  df-eu 1917  df-mo 1918

This theorem is referenced by: (None)