![]() |
Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > rabeqf | GIF version |
Description: Equality theorem for restricted class abstractions, with bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 7-Mar-2004.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rabeqf.1 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 |
rabeqf.2 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rabeqf | ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | rabeqf.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 | |
2 | rabeqf.2 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 | |
3 | 1, 2 | nfeq 2230 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 = 𝐵 |
4 | eleq2 2146 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) | |
5 | 4 | anbi1d 453 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))) |
6 | 3, 5 | abbid 2199 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)}) |
7 | df-rab 2362 | . 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
8 | df-rab 2362 | . 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
9 | 6, 7, 8 | 3eqtr4g 2140 | 1 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 102 = wceq 1285 ∈ wcel 1434 {cab 2069 Ⅎwnfc 2210 {crab 2357 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 5 ax-2 6 ax-mp 7 ax-ia1 104 ax-ia2 105 ax-ia3 106 ax-io 663 ax-5 1377 ax-7 1378 ax-gen 1379 ax-ie1 1423 ax-ie2 1424 ax-8 1436 ax-10 1437 ax-11 1438 ax-i12 1439 ax-bndl 1440 ax-4 1441 ax-17 1460 ax-i9 1464 ax-ial 1468 ax-i5r 1469 ax-ext 2065 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 115 df-tru 1288 df-nf 1391 df-sb 1688 df-clab 2070 df-cleq 2076 df-clel 2079 df-nfc 2212 df-rab 2362 |
This theorem is referenced by: rabeqif 2601 rabeq 2602 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |