Axiom ax-inf2 9104

Description: A standard version of Axiom of Infinity of ZF set theory. In English, it says: there exists a set that contains the empty set and the successors of all of its members. Theorem zfinf2 9105 shows it converted to abbreviations. This axiom was derived as theorem axinf2 9103 above, using our version of Infinity ax-inf 9101 and the Axiom of Regularity ax-reg 9056. We will reference ax-inf2 9104 instead of axinf2 9103 so that the ordinary uses of Regularity can be more easily identified. The reverse derivation of ax-inf 9101 from ax-inf2 9104 is shown by theorem axinf 9107. (Contributed by NM, 3-Nov-1996.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ax-inf2	⊢ ∃𝑥(∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧 ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → ∃𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ (𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦)))))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤

Detailed syntax breakdown of Axiom ax-inf2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		vy	. . . . . 6 setvar 𝑦
2		vx	. . . . . 6 setvar 𝑥
3	1, 2	wel 2115	. . . . 5 wff 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥
4		vz	. . . . . . . 8 setvar 𝑧
5	4, 1	wel 2115	. . . . . . 7 wff 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
6	5	wn 3	. . . . . 6 wff ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
7	6, 4	wal 1535	. . . . 5 wff ∀𝑧 ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
8	3, 7	wa 398	. . . 4 wff (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧 ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦)
9	8, 1	wex 1780	. . 3 wff ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧 ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦)
10	4, 2	wel 2115	. . . . . . 7 wff 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥
11		vw	. . . . . . . . . 10 setvar 𝑤
12	11, 4	wel 2115	. . . . . . . . 9 wff 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧
13	11, 1	wel 2115	. . . . . . . . . 10 wff 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦
14	11, 1	weq 1964	. . . . . . . . . 10 wff 𝑤 = 𝑦
15	13, 14	wo 843	. . . . . . . . 9 wff (𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦)
16	12, 15	wb 208	. . . . . . . 8 wff (𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ (𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦))
17	16, 11	wal 1535	. . . . . . 7 wff ∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ (𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦))
18	10, 17	wa 398	. . . . . 6 wff (𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ (𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦)))
19	18, 4	wex 1780	. . . . 5 wff ∃𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ (𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦)))
20	3, 19	wi 4	. . . 4 wff (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → ∃𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ (𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦))))
21	20, 1	wal 1535	. . 3 wff ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → ∃𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ (𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦))))
22	9, 21	wa 398	. 2 wff (∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧 ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → ∃𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ (𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦)))))
23	22, 2	wex 1780	1 wff ∃𝑥(∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧 ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → ∃𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ (𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦)))))

This axiom is referenced by:  zfinf2  9105