Definition df-sb 2070

Description: Define proper substitution. For our notation, we use [𝑡 / 𝑥]𝜑 to mean "the wff that results from the proper substitution of 𝑡 for 𝑥 in the wff 𝜑". That is, 𝑡 properly replaces 𝑥. For example, [𝑡 / 𝑥]𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 is the same as 𝑧 ∈ 𝑡 (when 𝑥 and 𝑧 are distinct), as shown in elsb4 2130.

Our notation was introduced in Haskell B. Curry's Foundations of Mathematical Logic (1977), p. 316 and is frequently used in textbooks of lambda calculus and combinatory logic. This notation improves the common but ambiguous notation, "𝜑(𝑡) is the wff that results when 𝑡 is properly substituted for 𝑥 in 𝜑(𝑥)". For example, if the original 𝜑(𝑥) is 𝑥 = 𝑡, then 𝜑(𝑡) is 𝑡 = 𝑡, from which we obtain that 𝜑(𝑥) is 𝑥 = 𝑥. So what exactly does 𝜑(𝑥) mean? Curry's notation solves this problem.

A very similar notation, namely (𝑦 ∣ 𝑥)𝜑, was introduced in Bourbaki's Set Theory (Chapter 1, Description of Formal Mathematic, 1953).

In most books, proper substitution has a somewhat complicated recursive definition with multiple cases based on the occurrences of free and bound variables in the wff. Instead, we use a single formula that is exactly equivalent and gives us a direct definition. We later prove that our definition has the properties we expect of proper substitution (see theorems sbequ 2090, sbcom2 2168 and sbid2v 2551).

Note that our definition is valid even when 𝑥 and 𝑡 are replaced with the same variable, as sbid 2257 shows. We achieve this by applying twice Tarski's definition sb6 2093 which is valid for disjoint variables, and introducing a dummy variable 𝑦 which isolates 𝑥 from 𝑡, as in dfsb7 2285 with respect to sb5 2276. We can also achieve this by having 𝑥 free in the first conjunct and bound in the second, as the alternate definition dfsb1 2510 shows. Another version that mixes free and bound variables is dfsb3 2533. When 𝑥 and 𝑡 are distinct, we can express proper substitution with the simpler expressions of sb5 2276 and sb6 2093.

Note that the occurrences of a given variable in the definiens are either all bound (𝑥, 𝑦) or all free (𝑡). Also note that the definiens uses only primitive symbols.

This double level definition will make several proofs using it appear as doubled. Alternately, one could often first prove as a lemma the same theorem with a disjoint variable condition on the substitute and the substituted variables, and then prove the original theorem by applying this lemma twice in a row. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1993.) Revised from the original definition dfsb1 2510. (Revised by BJ, 22-Dec-2020.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
df-sb	⊢ ([𝑡 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑡 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦   𝑦,𝑡   𝜑,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑡)

Detailed syntax breakdown of Definition df-sb

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		wph	. . 3 wff 𝜑
2		vx	. . 3 setvar 𝑥
3		vt	. . 3 setvar 𝑡
4	1, 2, 3	wsb 2069	. 2 wff [𝑡 / 𝑥]𝜑
5		vy	. . . . 5 setvar 𝑦
6	5, 3	weq 1964	. . . 4 wff 𝑦 = 𝑡
7	2, 5	weq 1964	. . . . . 6 wff 𝑥 = 𝑦
8	7, 1	wi 4	. . . . 5 wff (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑)
9	8, 2	wal 1535	. . . 4 wff ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑)
10	6, 9	wi 4	. . 3 wff (𝑦 = 𝑡 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))
11	10, 5	wal 1535	. 2 wff ∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑡 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))
12	4, 11	wb 208	1 wff ([𝑡 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑡 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑)))

This definition is referenced by:  sbt  2071  stdpc4  2073  sbi1  2076  spsbe  2088  spsbeOLD  2089  sbequ  2090  sb6  2093  sbal  2166  sbequ1  2249  sbequ2  2250  sbequ2OLD  2251  dfsb7  2285  dfsb7OLD  2286  sbn  2287  nfsbv  2349  sb4b  2499  sb4bOLD  2500  bj-ssbeq  33986  bj-ssbid2ALT  33996  bj-ssbid1ALT  33998