Theorem rexcomOLD 3355

Description: Obsolete version of rexcom 3354 as of 26-Aug-2023. Commutation of restricted existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 19-Nov-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rexcomOLD	⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦   𝑥,𝐵   𝑦,𝐴

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐴(𝑥)   𝐵(𝑦)

Proof of Theorem rexcomOLD

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ancom 463	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
2	1	anbi1i 625	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝜑))
3	2	2exbii 1848	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝜑))
4		excom 2168	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑥((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝜑))
5	3, 4	bitri 277	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑥((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝜑))
6		r2ex 3302	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑))
7		r2ex 3302	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑥((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝜑))
8	5, 6, 7	3bitr4i 305	1 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 398  ∃wex 1779   ∈ wcel 2113  ∃wrex 3138

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-11 2160

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-ex 1780  df-ral 3142  df-rex 3143

This theorem is referenced by: (None)