Theorem cbvoprab1 5607

Description: Rule used to change first bound variable in an operation abstraction, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 20-Dec-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 5-Dec-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
cbvoprab1.1	|- F/ w ph
cbvoprab1.2	|- F/ x ps
cbvoprab1.3	|- ( x = w -> ( ph <-> ps ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cbvoprab1	|- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } = { <. <. w , y >. , z >. | ps }

Distinct variable group:   x, y, z, w

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x, y, z, w)   ps( x, y, z, w)

Proof of Theorem cbvoprab1

Dummy variable v is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfv 1462	. . . . . 6 |- F/ w v = <. x , y >.
2		cbvoprab1.1	. . . . . 6 |- F/ w ph
3	1, 2	nfan 1498	. . . . 5 |- F/ w ( v = <. x , y >. /\ ph )
4	3	nfex 1569	. . . 4 |- F/ w E. y ( v = <. x , y >. /\ ph )
5		nfv 1462	. . . . . 6 |- F/ x v = <. w , y >.
6		cbvoprab1.2	. . . . . 6 |- F/ x ps
7	5, 6	nfan 1498	. . . . 5 |- F/ x ( v = <. w , y >. /\ ps )
8	7	nfex 1569	. . . 4 |- F/ x E. y ( v = <. w , y >. /\ ps )
9		opeq1 3578	. . . . . . 7 |- ( x = w -> <. x , y >. = <. w , y >. )
10	9	eqeq2d 2093	. . . . . 6 |- ( x = w -> ( v = <. x , y >. <-> v = <. w , y >. ) )
11		cbvoprab1.3	. . . . . 6 |- ( x = w -> ( ph <-> ps ) )
12	10, 11	anbi12d 457	. . . . 5 |- ( x = w -> ( ( v = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) <-> ( v = <. w , y >. /\ ps ) ) )
13	12	exbidv 1747	. . . 4 |- ( x = w -> ( E. y ( v = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) <-> E. y ( v = <. w , y >. /\ ps ) ) )
14	4, 8, 13	cbvex 1680	. . 3 |- ( E. x E. y ( v = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) <-> E. w E. y ( v = <. w , y >. /\ ps ) )
15	14	opabbii 3853	. 2 |- { <. v , z >. | E. x E. y ( v = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) } = { <. v , z >. | E. w E. y ( v = <. w , y >. /\ ps ) }
16		dfoprab2 5583	. 2 |- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } = { <. v , z >. | E. x E. y ( v = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) }
17		dfoprab2 5583	. 2 |- { <. <. w , y >. , z >. | ps } = { <. v , z >. | E. w E. y ( v = <. w , y >. /\ ps ) }
18	15, 16, 17	3eqtr4i 2112	1 |- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } = { <. <. w , y >. , z >. | ps }

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 102   <-> wb 103   = wceq 1285   F/wnf 1390   E.wex 1422   <.cop 3409   {copab 3846   {coprab 5544

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 663  ax-5 1377  ax-7 1378  ax-gen 1379  ax-ie1 1423  ax-ie2 1424  ax-8 1436  ax-10 1437  ax-11 1438  ax-i12 1439  ax-bndl 1440  ax-4 1441  ax-14 1446  ax-17 1460  ax-i9 1464  ax-ial 1468  ax-i5r 1469  ax-ext 2064  ax-sep 3904  ax-pow 3956  ax-pr 3972

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-3an 922  df-tru 1288  df-nf 1391  df-sb 1687  df-clab 2069  df-cleq 2075  df-clel 2078  df-nfc 2209  df-v 2604  df-un 2978  df-in 2980  df-ss 2987  df-pw 3392  df-sn 3412  df-pr 3413  df-op 3415  df-opab 3848  df-oprab 5547

This theorem is referenced by: (None)