ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  ecopovsym GIF version

Theorem ecopovsym 6232
Description: Assuming the operation 𝐹 is commutative, show that the relation , specified by the first hypothesis, is symmetric. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
ecopopr.1 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) ∧ ∃𝑧𝑤𝑣𝑢((𝑥 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩) ∧ (𝑧 + 𝑢) = (𝑤 + 𝑣)))}
ecopopr.com (𝑥 + 𝑦) = (𝑦 + 𝑥)
Assertion
Ref Expression
ecopovsym (𝐴 𝐵𝐵 𝐴)
Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤,𝑣,𝑢, +   𝑥,𝑆,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤,𝑣,𝑢
Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤,𝑣,𝑢)   𝐵(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤,𝑣,𝑢)   (𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤,𝑣,𝑢)

Proof of Theorem ecopovsym
Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑔 𝑡 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 ecopopr.1 . . . . 5 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) ∧ ∃𝑧𝑤𝑣𝑢((𝑥 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩) ∧ (𝑧 + 𝑢) = (𝑤 + 𝑣)))}
2 opabssxp 4441 . . . . 5 {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) ∧ ∃𝑧𝑤𝑣𝑢((𝑥 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩) ∧ (𝑧 + 𝑢) = (𝑤 + 𝑣)))} ⊆ ((𝑆 × 𝑆) × (𝑆 × 𝑆))
31, 2eqsstri 3002 . . . 4 ⊆ ((𝑆 × 𝑆) × (𝑆 × 𝑆))
43brel 4419 . . 3 (𝐴 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)))
5 eqid 2056 . . . 4 (𝑆 × 𝑆) = (𝑆 × 𝑆)
6 breq1 3794 . . . . 5 (⟨𝑓, 𝑔⟩ = 𝐴 → (⟨𝑓, 𝑔, 𝑡⟩ ↔ 𝐴 , 𝑡⟩))
7 breq2 3795 . . . . 5 (⟨𝑓, 𝑔⟩ = 𝐴 → (⟨, 𝑡𝑓, 𝑔⟩ ↔ ⟨, 𝑡 𝐴))
86, 7bibi12d 228 . . . 4 (⟨𝑓, 𝑔⟩ = 𝐴 → ((⟨𝑓, 𝑔, 𝑡⟩ ↔ ⟨, 𝑡𝑓, 𝑔⟩) ↔ (𝐴 , 𝑡⟩ ↔ ⟨, 𝑡 𝐴)))
9 breq2 3795 . . . . 5 (⟨, 𝑡⟩ = 𝐵 → (𝐴 , 𝑡⟩ ↔ 𝐴 𝐵))
10 breq1 3794 . . . . 5 (⟨, 𝑡⟩ = 𝐵 → (⟨, 𝑡 𝐴𝐵 𝐴))
119, 10bibi12d 228 . . . 4 (⟨, 𝑡⟩ = 𝐵 → ((𝐴 , 𝑡⟩ ↔ ⟨, 𝑡 𝐴) ↔ (𝐴 𝐵𝐵 𝐴)))
121ecopoveq 6231 . . . . . 6 (((𝑓𝑆𝑔𝑆) ∧ (𝑆𝑡𝑆)) → (⟨𝑓, 𝑔, 𝑡⟩ ↔ (𝑓 + 𝑡) = (𝑔 + )))
13 vex 2577 . . . . . . . . 9 𝑓 ∈ V
14 vex 2577 . . . . . . . . 9 𝑡 ∈ V
15 ecopopr.com . . . . . . . . 9 (𝑥 + 𝑦) = (𝑦 + 𝑥)
1613, 14, 15caovcom 5685 . . . . . . . 8 (𝑓 + 𝑡) = (𝑡 + 𝑓)
17 vex 2577 . . . . . . . . 9 𝑔 ∈ V
18 vex 2577 . . . . . . . . 9 ∈ V
1917, 18, 15caovcom 5685 . . . . . . . 8 (𝑔 + ) = ( + 𝑔)
2016, 19eqeq12i 2069 . . . . . . 7 ((𝑓 + 𝑡) = (𝑔 + ) ↔ (𝑡 + 𝑓) = ( + 𝑔))
21 eqcom 2058 . . . . . . 7 ((𝑡 + 𝑓) = ( + 𝑔) ↔ ( + 𝑔) = (𝑡 + 𝑓))
2220, 21bitri 177 . . . . . 6 ((𝑓 + 𝑡) = (𝑔 + ) ↔ ( + 𝑔) = (𝑡 + 𝑓))
2312, 22syl6bb 189 . . . . 5 (((𝑓𝑆𝑔𝑆) ∧ (𝑆𝑡𝑆)) → (⟨𝑓, 𝑔, 𝑡⟩ ↔ ( + 𝑔) = (𝑡 + 𝑓)))
241ecopoveq 6231 . . . . . 6 (((𝑆𝑡𝑆) ∧ (𝑓𝑆𝑔𝑆)) → (⟨, 𝑡𝑓, 𝑔⟩ ↔ ( + 𝑔) = (𝑡 + 𝑓)))
2524ancoms 259 . . . . 5 (((𝑓𝑆𝑔𝑆) ∧ (𝑆𝑡𝑆)) → (⟨, 𝑡𝑓, 𝑔⟩ ↔ ( + 𝑔) = (𝑡 + 𝑓)))
2623, 25bitr4d 184 . . . 4 (((𝑓𝑆𝑔𝑆) ∧ (𝑆𝑡𝑆)) → (⟨𝑓, 𝑔, 𝑡⟩ ↔ ⟨, 𝑡𝑓, 𝑔⟩))
275, 8, 11, 262optocl 4444 . . 3 ((𝐴 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) → (𝐴 𝐵𝐵 𝐴))
284, 27syl 14 . 2 (𝐴 𝐵 → (𝐴 𝐵𝐵 𝐴))
2928ibi 169 1 (𝐴 𝐵𝐵 𝐴)
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wa 101  wb 102   = wceq 1259  wex 1397  wcel 1409  cop 3405   class class class wbr 3791  {copab 3844   × cxp 4370  (class class class)co 5539
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 103  ax-ia2 104  ax-ia3 105  ax-io 640  ax-5 1352  ax-7 1353  ax-gen 1354  ax-ie1 1398  ax-ie2 1399  ax-8 1411  ax-10 1412  ax-11 1413  ax-i12 1414  ax-bndl 1415  ax-4 1416  ax-14 1421  ax-17 1435  ax-i9 1439  ax-ial 1443  ax-i5r 1444  ax-ext 2038  ax-sep 3902  ax-pow 3954  ax-pr 3971
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 114  df-3an 898  df-tru 1262  df-nf 1366  df-sb 1662  df-eu 1919  df-mo 1920  df-clab 2043  df-cleq 2049  df-clel 2052  df-nfc 2183  df-ral 2328  df-rex 2329  df-v 2576  df-un 2949  df-in 2951  df-ss 2958  df-pw 3388  df-sn 3408  df-pr 3409  df-op 3411  df-uni 3608  df-br 3792  df-opab 3846  df-xp 4378  df-iota 4894  df-fv 4937  df-ov 5542
This theorem is referenced by:  ecopover  6234
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator