Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > eqopab2b | GIF version |
Description: Equivalence of ordered pair abstraction equality and biconditional. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
eqopab2b | ⊢ ({〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | ssopab2b 4198 | . . 3 ⊢ ({〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓)) | |
2 | ssopab2b 4198 | . . 3 ⊢ ({〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜓 → 𝜑)) | |
3 | 1, 2 | anbi12i 455 | . 2 ⊢ (({〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜓} ∧ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑}) ↔ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜓 → 𝜑))) |
4 | eqss 3112 | . 2 ⊢ ({〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ({〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜓} ∧ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑})) | |
5 | 2albiim 1464 | . 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜓 → 𝜑))) | |
6 | 3, 4, 5 | 3bitr4i 211 | 1 ⊢ ({〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 103 ↔ wb 104 ∀wal 1329 = wceq 1331 ⊆ wss 3071 {copab 3988 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 105 ax-ia2 106 ax-ia3 107 ax-io 698 ax-5 1423 ax-7 1424 ax-gen 1425 ax-ie1 1469 ax-ie2 1470 ax-8 1482 ax-10 1483 ax-11 1484 ax-i12 1485 ax-bndl 1486 ax-4 1487 ax-14 1492 ax-17 1506 ax-i9 1510 ax-ial 1514 ax-i5r 1515 ax-ext 2121 ax-sep 4046 ax-pow 4098 ax-pr 4131 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 116 df-3an 964 df-tru 1334 df-nf 1437 df-sb 1736 df-eu 2002 df-mo 2003 df-clab 2126 df-cleq 2132 df-clel 2135 df-nfc 2270 df-ral 2421 df-v 2688 df-un 3075 df-in 3077 df-ss 3084 df-pw 3512 df-sn 3533 df-pr 3534 df-op 3536 df-opab 3990 |
This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |