Theorem bj-inexeqex 34449

Description: Lemma for bj-opelid 34451 (but not specific to the identity relation): if the intersection of two classes is a set and the two classes are equal, then both are sets (all three classes are equal, so they all belong to 𝑉, but it is more convenient to have V in the consequent for theorems using it). (Contributed by BJ, 27-Dec-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-inexeqex	⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))

Proof of Theorem bj-inexeqex

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqimss 4023	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)
2		df-ss 3952	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐴)
3	1, 2	sylib 220	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐴)
4		eleq1 2900	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐴 → ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉))
5	4	biimpac 481	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐴) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)
6	3, 5	sylan2 594	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)
7	6	elexd 3514	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → 𝐴 ∈ V)
8		eqimss2 4024	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)
9		sseqin2 4192	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐵)
10	8, 9	sylib 220	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐵)
11		eleq1 2900	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐵 → ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉 ↔ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉))
12	11	biimpac 481	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐵) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)
13	10, 12	sylan2 594	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)
14	13	elexd 3514	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → 𝐵 ∈ V)
15	7, 14	jca 514	1 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 398   = wceq 1537   ∈ wcel 2114  Vcvv 3494   ∩ cin 3935   ⊆ wss 3936

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2145  ax-11 2161  ax-12 2177  ax-ext 2793

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-tru 1540  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2070  df-clab 2800  df-cleq 2814  df-clel 2893  df-rab 3147  df-v 3496  df-in 3943  df-ss 3952

This theorem is referenced by:  bj-elsn0  34450  bj-opelid  34451  bj-ideqgALT  34453