Theorem drnfc1 2767

Description: Formula-building lemma for use with the Distinctor Reduction Theorem. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
drnfc1.1	⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
drnfc1	⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ↔ Ⅎ𝑦𝐵))

Proof of Theorem drnfc1

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		drnfc1.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
2	1	eleq2d 2672	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵))
3	2	drnf1 2316	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (Ⅎ𝑥 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ Ⅎ𝑦 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵))
4	3	dral2 2311	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑤Ⅎ𝑥 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑤Ⅎ𝑦 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵))
5		df-nfc 2739	. 2 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑤Ⅎ𝑥 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴)
6		df-nfc 2739	. 2 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑦𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑤Ⅎ𝑦 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵)
7	4, 5, 6	3bitr4g 301	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ↔ Ⅎ𝑦𝐵))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 194  ∀wal 1472   = wceq 1474  Ⅎwnf 1698   ∈ wcel 1976  Ⅎwnfc 2737

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1712  ax-4 1727  ax-5 1826  ax-6 1874  ax-7 1921  ax-10 2005  ax-11 2020  ax-12 2033  ax-13 2233  ax-ext 2589

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 195  df-or 383  df-an 384  df-tru 1477  df-ex 1695  df-nf 1700  df-cleq 2602  df-clel 2605  df-nfc 2739

This theorem is referenced by:  nfabd2  2769  nfcvb  4819  nfriotad  6497  bj-nfcsym  31875