Theorem rspcime 3624

Description: Prove a restricted existential. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 3-Aug-2023.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rspcime.1	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → 𝜓)
rspcime.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rspcime	⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)

Distinct variable groups:   𝜑,𝑥   𝑥,𝐵   𝑥,𝐴

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜓(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem rspcime

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rspcime.2	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
2		rspcime.1	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → 𝜓)
3		simpl 485	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → 𝜑)
4	2, 3	2thd 267	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜑))
5		id 22	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜑)
6	1, 4, 5	rspcedvd 3623	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 398   = wceq 1536   ∈ wcel 2113  ∃wrex 3138

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2014  ax-8 2115  ax-9 2123  ax-ext 2792

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-ex 1780  df-cleq 2813  df-clel 2892  df-ral 3142  df-rex 3143

This theorem is referenced by:  elrnmptdv  5826  mnuprdlem3  40684  mnurndlem1  40691  grumnudlem  40695  grumnud  40696  inaex  40707  gruex  40708