| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > stoic4a | GIF version | ||
| Description: Stoic logic Thema 4
version a.
Statement T4 of [Bobzien] p. 117 shows a reconstructed version of Stoic logic thema 4: "When from two assertibles a third follows, and from the third and one (or both) of the two and one (or more) external assertible(s) another follows, then this other follows from the first two and the external(s)." We use 𝜃 to represent the "external" assertibles. This is version a, which is without the phrase "or both"; see stoic4b 1453 for the version with the phrase "or both". (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 17-Feb-2019.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| stoic4a.1 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) |
| stoic4a.2 | ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| stoic4a | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | stoic4a.1 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) | |
| 2 | 1 | 3adant3 1020 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜒) |
| 3 | simp1 1000 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜑) | |
| 4 | simp3 1002 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜃) | |
| 5 | stoic4a.2 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) | |
| 6 | 2, 3, 4, 5 | syl3anc 1250 | 1 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 104 ∧ w3a 981 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-3an 983 |
| This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |