Axiom ax-inf2 9618

Description: A standard version of Axiom of Infinity of ZF set theory. In English, it says: there exists a set that contains the empty set and the successors of all of its members. Theorem zfinf2 9619 shows it converted to abbreviations. This axiom was derived as Theorem axinf2 9617 above, using our version of Infinity ax-inf 9615 and the Axiom of Regularity ax-reg 9562. We will reference ax-inf2 9618 instead of axinf2 9617 so that the ordinary uses of Regularity can be more easily identified. The reverse derivation of ax-inf 9615 from ax-inf2 9618 is shown by Theorem axinf 9621. (Contributed by NM, 3-Nov-1996.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ax-inf2	⊢ ∃𝑥(∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧 ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → ∃𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ (𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦)))))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤

Detailed syntax breakdown of Axiom ax-inf2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		vy	. . . . . 6 setvar 𝑦
2		vx	. . . . . 6 setvar 𝑥
3	1, 2	wel 2147	. . . . 5 wff 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥
4		vz	. . . . . . . 8 setvar 𝑧
5	4, 1	wel 2147	. . . . . . 7 wff 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
6	5	wn 3	. . . . . 6 wff ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
7	6, 4	wal 1568	. . . . 5 wff ∀𝑧 ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
8	3, 7	wa 401	. . . 4 wff (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧 ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦)
9	8, 1	wex 1812	. . 3 wff ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧 ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦)
10	4, 2	wel 2147	. . . . . . 7 wff 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥
11		vw	. . . . . . . . . 10 setvar 𝑤
12	11, 4	wel 2147	. . . . . . . . 9 wff 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧
13	11, 1	wel 2147	. . . . . . . . . 10 wff 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦
14	11, 1	weq 1995	. . . . . . . . . 10 wff 𝑤 = 𝑦
15	13, 14	wo 861	. . . . . . . . 9 wff (𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦)
16	12, 15	wb 209	. . . . . . . 8 wff (𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ (𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦))
17	16, 11	wal 1568	. . . . . . 7 wff ∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ (𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦))
18	10, 17	wa 401	. . . . . 6 wff (𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ (𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦)))
19	18, 4	wex 1812	. . . . 5 wff ∃𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ (𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦)))
20	3, 19	wi 4	. . . 4 wff (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → ∃𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ (𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦))))
21	20, 1	wal 1568	. . 3 wff ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → ∃𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ (𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦))))
22	9, 21	wa 401	. 2 wff (∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧 ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → ∃𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ (𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦)))))
23	22, 2	wex 1812	1 wff ∃𝑥(∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧 ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → ∃𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ (𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦)))))

This axiom is used by:  zfinf2  9619  axnulALT3  35565  axprALT2  35566