P. 97 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 9601-9700   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	cantnflem4 9601*	Lemma for cantnf 9602. Complete the induction step of cantnflem3 9600. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥‘𝑧) ∈ (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ ran (𝐴 CNF 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∅ ∈ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = ∪ ∩ {𝑐 ∈ On ∣ 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 ↑o 𝑐)}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (℩𝑑∃𝑎 ∈ On ∃𝑏 ∈ (𝐴 ↑o 𝑋)(𝑑 = ⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∧ (((𝐴 ↑o 𝑋) ·o 𝑎) +o 𝑏) = 𝐶))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (1st ‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (2nd ‘𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ran (𝐴 CNF 𝐵))
Theorem	cantnf 9602*	The Cantor Normal Form theorem. The function (𝐴 CNF 𝐵), which maps a finitely supported function from 𝐵 to 𝐴 to the sum ((𝐴 ↑o 𝑓(𝑎1)) ∘ 𝑎1) +o ((𝐴 ↑o 𝑓(𝑎2)) ∘ 𝑎2) +o ... over all indices 𝑎 < 𝐵 such that 𝑓(𝑎) is nonzero, is an order isomorphism from the ordering 𝑇 of finitely supported functions to the set (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵) under the natural order. Setting 𝐴 = ω and letting 𝐵 be arbitrarily large, the surjectivity of this function implies that every ordinal has a Cantor normal form (and injectivity, together with coherence cantnfres 9586, implies that such a representation is unique). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥‘𝑧) ∈ (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 CNF 𝐵) Isom 𝑇, E (𝑆, (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵)))
Theorem	oemapwe 9603*	The lexicographic order on a function space of ordinals gives a well-ordering with order type equal to the ordinal exponential. This provides an alternate definition of the ordinal exponential. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥‘𝑧) ∈ (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 We 𝑆 ∧ dom OrdIso(𝑇, 𝑆) = (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵)))
Theorem	cantnffval2 9604*	An alternate definition of df-cnf 9571 which relies on cantnf 9602. (Note that although the use of 𝑆 seems self-referential, one can use cantnfdm 9573 to eliminate it.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥‘𝑧) ∈ (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 CNF 𝐵) = ◡OrdIso(𝑇, 𝑆))
Theorem	cantnff1o 9605	Simplify the isomorphism of cantnf 9602 to simple bijection. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 CNF 𝐵):𝑆–1-1-onto→(𝐴 ↑o 𝐵))
Theorem	wemapwe 9606*	Construct lexicographic order on a function space based on a reverse well-ordering of the indices and a well-ordering of the values. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 3-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧)𝑆(𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑧𝑅𝑤 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))}    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp 𝑍}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 We 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 We 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ ∅)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = OrdIso(𝑆, 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝐺‘∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 We 𝑈)
Theorem	oef1o 9607*	A bijection of the base sets induces a bijection on ordinal exponentials. (The assumption (𝐹‘∅) = ∅ can be discharged using fveqf1o 7248.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 3-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (On ∖ 1o))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘∅) = ∅)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp ∅} ↦ (𝐹 ∘ (𝑦 ∘ ◡𝐺)))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (((𝐶 CNF 𝐷) ∘ 𝐾) ∘ ◡(𝐴 CNF 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:(𝐴 ↑o 𝐵)–1-1-onto→(𝐶 ↑o 𝐷))
Theorem	cnfcomlem 9608*	Lemma for cnfcom 9609. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 3-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (ω CNF 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (◡(ω CNF 𝐴)‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = OrdIso( E , (𝐹 supp ∅))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝑀 +o 𝑧)), ∅)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑓 ∈ V ↦ 𝐾), ∅)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((ω ↑o (𝐺‘𝑘)) ·o (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑘)))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 ↦ (dom 𝑓 +o 𝑥)) ∪ ◡(𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑓 ↦ (𝑀 +o 𝑥)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ dom 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ (ω ↑o (𝐺‘𝐼)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇‘𝐼):(𝐻‘𝐼)–1-1-onto→𝑂)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇‘suc 𝐼):(𝐻‘suc 𝐼)–1-1-onto→((ω ↑o (𝐺‘𝐼)) ·o (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝐼))))
Theorem	cnfcom 9609*	Any ordinal 𝐵 is equinumerous to the leading term of its Cantor normal form. Here we show that bijection explicitly. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 3-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (ω CNF 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (◡(ω CNF 𝐴)‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = OrdIso( E , (𝐹 supp ∅))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝑀 +o 𝑧)), ∅)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑓 ∈ V ↦ 𝐾), ∅)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((ω ↑o (𝐺‘𝑘)) ·o (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑘)))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 ↦ (dom 𝑓 +o 𝑥)) ∪ ◡(𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑓 ↦ (𝑀 +o 𝑥)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ dom 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇‘suc 𝐼):(𝐻‘suc 𝐼)–1-1-onto→((ω ↑o (𝐺‘𝐼)) ·o (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝐼))))
Theorem	cnfcom2lem 9610*	Lemma for cnfcom2 9611. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 3-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (ω CNF 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (◡(ω CNF 𝐴)‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = OrdIso( E , (𝐹 supp ∅))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝑀 +o 𝑧)), ∅)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑓 ∈ V ↦ 𝐾), ∅)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((ω ↑o (𝐺‘𝑘)) ·o (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑘)))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 ↦ (dom 𝑓 +o 𝑥)) ∪ ◡(𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑓 ↦ (𝑀 +o 𝑥)))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐺‘∪ dom 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∅ ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝐺 = suc ∪ dom 𝐺)
Theorem	cnfcom2 9611*	Any nonzero ordinal 𝐵 is equinumerous to the leading term of its Cantor normal form. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 3-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (ω CNF 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (◡(ω CNF 𝐴)‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = OrdIso( E , (𝐹 supp ∅))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝑀 +o 𝑧)), ∅)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑓 ∈ V ↦ 𝐾), ∅)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((ω ↑o (𝐺‘𝑘)) ·o (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑘)))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 ↦ (dom 𝑓 +o 𝑥)) ∪ ◡(𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑓 ↦ (𝑀 +o 𝑥)))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐺‘∪ dom 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∅ ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇‘dom 𝐺):𝐵–1-1-onto→((ω ↑o 𝑊) ·o (𝐹‘𝑊)))
Theorem	cnfcom3lem 9612*	Lemma for cnfcom3 9613. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 4-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (ω CNF 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (◡(ω CNF 𝐴)‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = OrdIso( E , (𝐹 supp ∅))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝑀 +o 𝑧)), ∅)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑓 ∈ V ↦ 𝐾), ∅)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((ω ↑o (𝐺‘𝑘)) ·o (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑘)))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 ↦ (dom 𝑓 +o 𝑥)) ∪ ◡(𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑓 ↦ (𝑀 +o 𝑥)))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐺‘∪ dom 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ⊆ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ (On ∖ 1o))
Theorem	cnfcom3 9613*	Any infinite ordinal 𝐵 is equinumerous to a power of ω. (We are being careful here to show explicit bijections rather than simple equinumerosity because we want a uniform construction for cnfcom3c 9615.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 4-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (ω CNF 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (◡(ω CNF 𝐴)‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = OrdIso( E , (𝐹 supp ∅))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝑀 +o 𝑧)), ∅)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑓 ∈ V ↦ 𝐾), ∅)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((ω ↑o (𝐺‘𝑘)) ·o (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑘)))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 ↦ (dom 𝑓 +o 𝑥)) ∪ ◡(𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑓 ↦ (𝑀 +o 𝑥)))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐺‘∪ dom 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ⊆ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (𝑢 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑊), 𝑣 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝑊) ↦ (((𝐹‘𝑊) ·o 𝑣) +o 𝑢))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (𝑢 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑊), 𝑣 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝑊) ↦ (((ω ↑o 𝑊) ·o 𝑢) +o 𝑣))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑋 ∘ ◡𝑌) ∘ (𝑇‘dom 𝐺))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁:𝐵–1-1-onto→(ω ↑o 𝑊))
Theorem	cnfcom3clem 9614*	Lemma for cnfcom3c 9615. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 4-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (ω CNF 𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (◡(ω CNF 𝐴)‘𝑏)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = OrdIso( E , (𝐹 supp ∅))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝑀 +o 𝑧)), ∅)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑓 ∈ V ↦ 𝐾), ∅)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((ω ↑o (𝐺‘𝑘)) ·o (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑘)))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 ↦ (dom 𝑓 +o 𝑥)) ∪ ◡(𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑓 ↦ (𝑀 +o 𝑥)))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐺‘∪ dom 𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (𝑢 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑊), 𝑣 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝑊) ↦ (((𝐹‘𝑊) ·o 𝑣) +o 𝑢))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (𝑢 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑊), 𝑣 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝑊) ↦ (((ω ↑o 𝑊) ·o 𝑢) +o 𝑣))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑋 ∘ ◡𝑌) ∘ (𝑇‘dom 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑏 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝐴) ↦ 𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ∃𝑔∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 (ω ⊆ 𝑏 → ∃𝑤 ∈ (On ∖ 1o)(𝑔‘𝑏):𝑏–1-1-onto→(ω ↑o 𝑤)))
Theorem	cnfcom3c 9615*	Wrap the construction of cnfcom3 9613 into an existential quantifier. For any ω ⊆ 𝑏, there is a bijection from 𝑏 to some power of ω. Furthermore, this bijection is canonical , which means that we can find a single function 𝑔 which will give such bijections for every 𝑏 less than some arbitrarily large bound 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ∃𝑔∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 (ω ⊆ 𝑏 → ∃𝑤 ∈ (On ∖ 1o)(𝑔‘𝑏):𝑏–1-1-onto→(ω ↑o 𝑤)))
2.6.4  Transitive closure of a relation
Syntax	cttrcl 9616	Declare the syntax for the transitive closure of a class.
class t++𝑅
Definition	df-ttrcl 9617*	Define the transitive closure of a class. This is the smallest relation containing 𝑅 (or more precisely, the relation (𝑅 ↾ V) induced by 𝑅) and having the transitive property. Definition from [Levy] p. 59, who denotes it as 𝑅∗ and calls it the "ancestral" of 𝑅. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Oct-2024.)
⊢ t++𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ 1o)∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn suc 𝑛 ∧ ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝑥 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑛) = 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑚 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑓‘𝑚)𝑅(𝑓‘suc 𝑚))}
Theorem	ttrcleq 9618	Equality theorem for transitive closure. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → t++𝑅 = t++𝑆)
Theorem	nfttrcld 9619	Bound variable hypothesis builder for transitive closure. Deduction form. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥t++𝑅)
Theorem	nfttrcl 9620	Bound variable hypothesis builder for transitive closure. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Oct-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥t++𝑅
Theorem	relttrcl 9621	The transitive closure of a class is a relation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Oct-2024.)
⊢ Rel t++𝑅
Theorem	brttrcl 9622*	Characterization of elements of the transitive closure of a relation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴t++𝑅𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ 1o)∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn suc 𝑛 ∧ ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑛) = 𝐵) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑓‘𝑎)𝑅(𝑓‘suc 𝑎)))
Theorem	brttrcl2 9623*	Characterization of elements of the transitive closure of a relation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴t++𝑅𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑛 ∈ ω ∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn suc suc 𝑛 ∧ ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑓‘suc 𝑛) = 𝐵) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ suc 𝑛(𝑓‘𝑎)𝑅(𝑓‘suc 𝑎)))
Theorem	ssttrcl 9624	If 𝑅 is a relation, then it is a subclass of its transitive closure. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → 𝑅 ⊆ t++𝑅)
Theorem	ttrcltr 9625	The transitive closure of a class is transitive. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (t++𝑅 ∘ t++𝑅) ⊆ t++𝑅
Theorem	ttrclresv 9626	The transitive closure of 𝑅 restricted to V is the same as the transitive closure of 𝑅 itself. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Oct-2024.)
⊢ t++(𝑅 ↾ V) = t++𝑅
Theorem	ttrclco 9627	Composition law for the transitive closure of a relation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (t++𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ t++𝑅
Theorem	cottrcl 9628	Composition law for the transitive closure of a relation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∘ t++𝑅) ⊆ t++𝑅
Theorem	ttrclss 9629	If 𝑅 is a subclass of 𝑆 and 𝑆 is transitive, then the transitive closure of 𝑅 is a subclass of 𝑆. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Oct-2024.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ⊆ 𝑆 ∧ (𝑆 ∘ 𝑆) ⊆ 𝑆) → t++𝑅 ⊆ 𝑆)
Theorem	dmttrcl 9630	The domain of a transitive closure is the same as the domain of the original class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Oct-2024.)
⊢ dom t++𝑅 = dom 𝑅
Theorem	rnttrcl 9631	The range of a transitive closure is the same as the range of the original class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Oct-2024.)
⊢ ran t++𝑅 = ran 𝑅
Theorem	ttrclexg 9632	If 𝑅 is a set, then so is t++𝑅. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → t++𝑅 ∈ V)
Theorem	dfttrcl2 9633*	When 𝑅 is a set and a relation, then its transitive closure can be defined by an intersection. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Oct-2024.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Rel 𝑅) → t++𝑅 = ∩ {𝑧 ∣ (𝑅 ⊆ 𝑧 ∧ (𝑧 ∘ 𝑧) ⊆ 𝑧)})
Theorem	ttrclselem1 9634*	Lemma for ttrclse 9636. Show that all finite ordinal function values of 𝐹 are subsets of 𝐴. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 31-Oct-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = rec((𝑏 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑏 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤)), Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ω → (𝐹‘𝑁) ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	ttrclselem2 9635*	Lemma for ttrclse 9636. Show that a suc 𝑁 element long chain gives membership in the 𝑁-th predecessor class and vice-versa. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 31-Oct-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = rec((𝑏 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑏 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤)), Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn suc suc 𝑁 ∧ ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝑦 ∧ (𝑓‘suc 𝑁) = 𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ suc 𝑁(𝑓‘𝑎)(𝑅 ↾ 𝐴)(𝑓‘suc 𝑎)) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑁)))
Theorem	ttrclse 9636	If 𝑅 is set-like over 𝐴, then the transitive closure of the restriction of 𝑅 to 𝐴 is set-like over 𝐴. This theorem requires the axioms of infinity and replacement for its proof. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 31-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝑅 Se 𝐴 → t++(𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) Se 𝐴)
2.6.5  Transitive closure
Theorem	trcl 9637*	For any set 𝐴, show the properties of its transitive closure 𝐶. Similar to Theorem 9.1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 73 except that we show an explicit expression for the transitive closure rather than just its existence. See tz9.1 9638 for an abbreviated version showing existence. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (rec((𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝑧 ∪ ∪ 𝑧)), 𝐴) ↾ ω)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ ω (𝐹‘𝑦)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ Tr 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑥((𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ Tr 𝑥) → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝑥))
Theorem	tz9.1 9638*	Every set has a transitive closure (the smallest transitive extension). Theorem 9.1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 73. See trcl 9637 for an explicit expression for the transitive closure. Apparently open problems are whether this theorem can be proved without the Axiom of Infinity; if not, then whether it implies Infinity; and if not, what is the "property" that Infinity has that the other axioms don't have that is weaker than Infinity itself? (Added 22-Mar-2011) The following article seems to answer the first question, that it can't be proved without Infinity, in the affirmative: Mancini, Antonella and Zambella, Domenico (2001). "A note on recursive models of set theories." Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 42(2):109-115. (Thanks to Scott Fenton.) (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2003.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ∃𝑥(𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ Tr 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦((𝐴 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ Tr 𝑦) → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦))
Theorem	tz9.1c 9639*	Alternate expression for the existence of transitive closures tz9.1 9638: the intersection of all transitive sets containing 𝐴 is a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ Tr 𝑥)} ∈ V
Theorem	epfrs 9640*	The strong form of the Axiom of Regularity (no sethood requirement on 𝐴), with the axiom itself present as an antecedent. See also zfregs 9641. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Mar-2013.)
⊢ (( E Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∩ 𝐴) = ∅)
Theorem	zfregs 9641*	The strong form of the Axiom of Regularity, which does not require that 𝐴 be a set. Axiom 6' of [TakeutiZaring] p. 21. See also epfrs 9640. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∩ 𝐴) = ∅)
Theorem	zfregs2 9642*	Alternate strong form of the Axiom of Regularity. Not every element of a nonempty class contains some element of that class. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Oct-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 27-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))
Syntax	ctc 9643	Extend class notation to include the transitive closure function.
class TC
Definition	df-tc 9644*	The transitive closure function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2013.)
⊢ TC = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ ∩ {𝑦 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ Tr 𝑦)})
Theorem	tcvalg 9645*	Value of the transitive closure function. (The fact that this intersection exists is a non-trivial fact that depends on ax-inf 9547; see tz9.1 9638.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (TC‘𝐴) = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ Tr 𝑥)})
Theorem	tcid 9646	Defining property of the transitive closure function: it contains its argument as a subset. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ⊆ (TC‘𝐴))
Theorem	tctr 9647	Defining property of the transitive closure function: it is transitive. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2013.)
⊢ Tr (TC‘𝐴)
Theorem	tcmin 9648	Defining property of the transitive closure function: it is a subset of any transitive class containing 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ Tr 𝐵) → (TC‘𝐴) ⊆ 𝐵))
Theorem	tc2 9649*	A variant of the definition of the transitive closure function, using instead the smallest transitive set containing 𝐴 as a member, gives almost the same set, except that 𝐴 itself must be added because it is not usually a member of (TC‘𝐴) (and it is never a member if 𝐴 is well-founded). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((TC‘𝐴) ∪ {𝐴}) = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ Tr 𝑥)}
Theorem	tcsni 9650	The transitive closure of a singleton. Proof suggested by Gérard Lang. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (TC‘{𝐴}) = ((TC‘𝐴) ∪ {𝐴})
Theorem	tcss 9651	The transitive closure function inherits the subset relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 → (TC‘𝐵) ⊆ (TC‘𝐴))
Theorem	tcel 9652	The transitive closure function converts the element relation to the subset relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → (TC‘𝐵) ⊆ (TC‘𝐴))
Theorem	tcidm 9653	The transitive closure function is idempotent. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (TC‘(TC‘𝐴)) = (TC‘𝐴)
Theorem	tc0 9654	The transitive closure of the empty set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (TC‘∅) = ∅
Theorem	tc00 9655	The transitive closure is empty iff its argument is. Proof suggested by Gérard Lang. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ((TC‘𝐴) = ∅ ↔ 𝐴 = ∅))
2.6.6  Set induction (or epsilon induction)
Theorem	setind 9656*	Set (epsilon) induction. Theorem 5.22 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 21. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2003.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐴 = V)
Theorem	setind2 9657	Set (epsilon) induction, stated compactly. Given as a homework problem in 1992 by George Boolos (1940-1996). (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2003.)
⊢ (𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐴 → 𝐴 = V)
Theorem	setinds 9658*	Principle of set induction (or E-induction). If a property passes from all elements of 𝑥 to 𝑥 itself, then it holds for all 𝑥. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 10-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜑
Theorem	setinds2f 9659*	E induction schema, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 10-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜓 → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜑
Theorem	setinds2 9660*	E induction schema, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 10-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜓 → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜑
2.6.7  Well-Founded Induction
Theorem	frmin 9661*	Every (possibly proper) subclass of a class 𝐴 with a well-founded set-like relation 𝑅 has a minimal element. This is a very strong generalization of tz6.26 6305 and tz7.5 6338. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Feb-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 27-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅)) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 Pred(𝑅, 𝐵, 𝑦) = ∅)
Theorem	frind 9662*	A subclass of a well-founded class 𝐴 with the property that whenever it contains all predecessors of an element of 𝐴 it also contains that element, is equal to 𝐴. Compare wfi 6307 and tfi 7795, which are special cases of this theorem that do not require the axiom of infinity. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Feb-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦) ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵))) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	frinsg 9663*	Well-Founded Induction Schema. If a property passes from all elements less than 𝑦 of a well-founded class 𝐴 to 𝑦 itself (induction hypothesis), then the property holds for all elements of 𝐴. Theorem 5.6(ii) of [Levy] p. 64. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Feb-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → (∀𝑧 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦)[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑 → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	frins 9664*	Well-Founded Induction Schema. If a property passes from all elements less than 𝑦 of a well-founded class 𝐴 to 𝑦 itself (induction hypothesis), then the property holds for all elements of 𝐴. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Feb-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝑅 Fr 𝐴    &   ⊢ 𝑅 Se 𝐴    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → (∀𝑧 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦)[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑 → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑)
Theorem	frins2f 9665*	Well-Founded Induction schema, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Feb-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → (∀𝑧 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦)𝜓 → 𝜑))    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	frins2 9666*	Well-Founded Induction schema, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Feb-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → (∀𝑧 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦)𝜓 → 𝜑))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	frins3 9667*	Well-Founded Induction schema, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Feb-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → (∀𝑧 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦)𝜓 → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜒)
2.6.8  Well-Founded Recursion
Theorem	frr3g 9668*	Functions defined by well-founded recursion are identical up to relation, domain, and characteristic function. General version of frr3 9673. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 10-Feb-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) = (𝑦𝐻(𝐹 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦)))) ∧ (𝐺 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐺‘𝑦) = (𝑦𝐻(𝐺 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦))))) → 𝐹 = 𝐺)
Theorem	frrlem15 9669*	Lemma for general well-founded recursion. Two acceptable functions are compatible. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Sep-2023.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦) ⊆ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝑦𝐺(𝑓 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦))))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = frecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (𝑔 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑥𝑔𝑢 ∧ 𝑥ℎ𝑣) → 𝑢 = 𝑣))
Theorem	frrlem16 9670*	Lemma for general well-founded recursion. Establish a subset relation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Sep-2023.) Revised notion of transitive closure. (Revised by Scott Fenton, 1-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → ∀𝑤 ∈ Pred (t++(𝑅 ↾ 𝐴), 𝐴, 𝑧)Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤) ⊆ Pred(t++(𝑅 ↾ 𝐴), 𝐴, 𝑧))
Theorem	frr1 9671	Law of general well-founded recursion, part one. This theorem and the following two drop the partial order requirement from fpr1 8245, fpr2 8246, and fpr3 8247, which requires using the axiom of infinity (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Sep-2023.)
⊢ 𝐹 = frecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)
Theorem	frr2 9672	Law of general well-founded recursion, part two. Now we establish the value of 𝐹 within 𝐴. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Sep-2023.)
⊢ 𝐹 = frecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = (𝑋𝐺(𝐹 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋))))
Theorem	frr3 9673*	Law of general well-founded recursion, part three. Finally, we show that 𝐹 is unique. We do this by showing that any function 𝐻 with the same properties we proved of 𝐹 in frr1 9671 and frr2 9672 is identical to 𝐹. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Sep-2023.)
⊢ 𝐹 = frecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (𝐻 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘𝑧) = (𝑧𝐺(𝐻 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑧))))) → 𝐹 = 𝐻)
2.6.9  Rank
Syntax	cr1 9674	Extend class definition to include the cumulative hierarchy of sets function.
class 𝑅1
Syntax	crnk 9675	Extend class definition to include rank function.
class rank
Definition	df-r1 9676	Define the cumulative hierarchy of sets function, using Takeuti and Zaring's notation (𝑅1). Starting with the empty set, this function builds up layers of sets where the next layer is the power set of the previous layer (and the union of previous layers when the argument is a limit ordinal). Using the Axiom of Regularity, we can show that any set whatsoever belongs to one of the layers of this hierarchy (see tz9.13 9703). Our definition expresses Definition 9.9 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 76 in a closed form, from which we derive the recursive definition as Theorems r10 9680, r1suc 9682, and r1lim 9684. Theorem r1val1 9698 shows a recursive definition that works for all values, and Theorems r1val2 9749 and r1val3 9750 show the value expressed in terms of rank. Other notations for this function are R with the argument as a subscript (Equation 3.1 of [BellMachover] p. 477), V with a subscript (Definition of [Enderton] p. 202), M with a subscript (Definition 15.19 of [Monk1] p. 113), the capital Greek letter psi (Definition of [Mendelson] p. 281), and bold-face R (Definition 2.1 of [Kunen] p. 95). (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-2003.)
⊢ 𝑅1 = rec((𝑥 ∈ V ↦ 𝒫 𝑥), ∅)
Definition	df-rank 9677*	Define the rank function. See rankval 9728, rankval2 9730, rankval3 9752, or rankval4 9779 its value. The rank is a kind of "inverse" of the cumulative hierarchy of sets function 𝑅1: given a set, it returns an ordinal number telling us the smallest layer of the hierarchy to which the set belongs. Based on Definition 9.14 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 79. Theorem rankid 9745 illustrates the "inverse" concept. Another nice theorem showing the relationship is rankr1a 9748. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2003.)
⊢ rank = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ ∩ {𝑦 ∈ On ∣ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑅1‘suc 𝑦)})
Theorem	r1funlim 9678	The cumulative hierarchy of sets function is a function on a limit ordinal. (This weak form of r1fnon 9679 avoids ax-rep 5224.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (Fun 𝑅1 ∧ Lim dom 𝑅1)
Theorem	r1fnon 9679	The cumulative hierarchy of sets function is a function on the class of ordinal numbers. (Contributed by NM, 5-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2013.)
⊢ 𝑅1 Fn On
Theorem	r10 9680	Value of the cumulative hierarchy of sets function at ∅. Part of Definition 9.9 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 76. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (𝑅1‘∅) = ∅
Theorem	r1sucg 9681	Value of the cumulative hierarchy of sets function at a successor ordinal. Part of Definition 9.9 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 76. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅1 → (𝑅1‘suc 𝐴) = 𝒫 (𝑅1‘𝐴))
Theorem	r1suc 9682	Value of the cumulative hierarchy of sets function at a successor ordinal. Part of Definition 9.9 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 76. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝑅1‘suc 𝐴) = 𝒫 (𝑅1‘𝐴))
Theorem	r1limg 9683*	Value of the cumulative hierarchy of sets function at a limit ordinal. Part of Definition 9.9 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 76. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅1 ∧ Lim 𝐴) → (𝑅1‘𝐴) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑅1‘𝑥))
Theorem	r1lim 9684*	Value of the cumulative hierarchy of sets function at a limit ordinal. Part of Definition 9.9 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 76. (Contributed by NM, 4-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ Lim 𝐴) → (𝑅1‘𝐴) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑅1‘𝑥))
Theorem	r1fin 9685	The first ω levels of the cumulative hierarchy are all finite. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (𝑅1‘𝐴) ∈ Fin)
Theorem	r1sdom 9686	Each stage in the cumulative hierarchy is strictly larger than the last. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑅1‘𝐵) ≺ (𝑅1‘𝐴))
Theorem	r111 9687	The cumulative hierarchy is a one-to-one function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝑅1:On–1-1→V
Theorem	r1tr 9688	The cumulative hierarchy of sets is transitive. Lemma 7T of [Enderton] p. 202. (Contributed by NM, 8-Sep-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ Tr (𝑅1‘𝐴)
Theorem	r1tr2 9689	The union of a cumulative hierarchy of sets at ordinal 𝐴 is a subset of the hierarchy at 𝐴. JFM CLASSES1 th. 40. (Contributed by FL, 20-Apr-2011.)
⊢ ∪ (𝑅1‘𝐴) ⊆ (𝑅1‘𝐴)
Theorem	r1ordg 9690	Ordering relation for the cumulative hierarchy of sets. Part of Proposition 9.10(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 77. (Contributed by NM, 8-Sep-2003.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝑅1‘𝐴) ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵)))
Theorem	r1ord3g 9691	Ordering relation for the cumulative hierarchy of sets. Part of Theorem 3.3(i) of [BellMachover] p. 478. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2003.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅1 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝑅1‘𝐴) ⊆ (𝑅1‘𝐵)))
Theorem	r1ord 9692	Ordering relation for the cumulative hierarchy of sets. Part of Proposition 9.10(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 77. (Contributed by NM, 8-Sep-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ On → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝑅1‘𝐴) ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵)))
Theorem	r1ord2 9693	Ordering relation for the cumulative hierarchy of sets. Part of Proposition 9.10(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 77. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2003.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ On → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝑅1‘𝐴) ⊆ (𝑅1‘𝐵)))
Theorem	r1ord3 9694	Ordering relation for the cumulative hierarchy of sets. Part of Theorem 3.3(i) of [BellMachover] p. 478. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2003.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝑅1‘𝐴) ⊆ (𝑅1‘𝐵)))
Theorem	r1sssuc 9695	The value of the cumulative hierarchy of sets function is a subset of its value at the successor. JFM CLASSES1 Th. 39. (Contributed by FL, 20-Apr-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝑅1‘𝐴) ⊆ (𝑅1‘suc 𝐴))
Theorem	r1pwss 9696	Each set of the cumulative hierarchy is closed under subsets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ (𝑅1‘𝐵))
Theorem	r1sscl 9697	Each set of the cumulative hierarchy is closed under subsets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵))
Theorem	r1val1 9698*	The value of the cumulative hierarchy of sets function expressed recursively. Theorem 7Q of [Enderton] p. 202. (Contributed by NM, 25-Nov-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅1 → (𝑅1‘𝐴) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝒫 (𝑅1‘𝑥))
Theorem	tz9.12lem1 9699*	Lemma for tz9.12 9702. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑧 ∈ V ↦ ∩ {𝑣 ∈ On ∣ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝑣)})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 “ 𝐴) ⊆ On
Theorem	tz9.12lem2 9700*	Lemma for tz9.12 9702. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2003.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑧 ∈ V ↦ ∩ {𝑣 ∈ On ∣ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝑣)})    ⇒   ⊢ suc ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝐴) ∈ On