P. 97 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 9601-9700   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	cantnfp1lem3 9601*	Lemma for cantnfp1 9602. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 1-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 supp ∅) ⊆ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑡 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if(𝑡 = 𝑋, 𝑌, (𝐺‘𝑡)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∅ ∈ 𝑌)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = OrdIso( E , (𝐹 supp ∅))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (((𝐴 ↑o (𝑂‘𝑘)) ·o (𝐹‘(𝑂‘𝑘))) +o 𝑧)), ∅)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = OrdIso( E , (𝐺 supp ∅))    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (((𝐴 ↑o (𝐾‘𝑘)) ·o (𝐺‘(𝐾‘𝑘))) +o 𝑧)), ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 CNF 𝐵)‘𝐹) = (((𝐴 ↑o 𝑋) ·o 𝑌) +o ((𝐴 CNF 𝐵)‘𝐺)))
Theorem	cantnfp1 9602*	If 𝐹 is created by adding a single term (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝑌 to 𝐺, where 𝑋 is larger than any element of the support of 𝐺, then 𝐹 is also a finitely supported function and it is assigned the value ((𝐴 ↑o 𝑋) ·o 𝑌) +o 𝑧 where 𝑧 is the value of 𝐺. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 1-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 supp ∅) ⊆ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑡 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if(𝑡 = 𝑋, 𝑌, (𝐺‘𝑡)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ ((𝐴 CNF 𝐵)‘𝐹) = (((𝐴 ↑o 𝑋) ·o 𝑌) +o ((𝐴 CNF 𝐵)‘𝐺))))
Theorem	oemapso 9603*	The relation 𝑇 is a strict order on 𝑆 (a corollary of wemapso2 9470). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥‘𝑧) ∈ (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 Or 𝑆)
Theorem	oemapval 9604*	Value of the relation 𝑇. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥‘𝑧) ∈ (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹𝑇𝐺 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐹‘𝑧) ∈ (𝐺‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 → (𝐹‘𝑤) = (𝐺‘𝑤)))))
Theorem	oemapvali 9605*	If 𝐹 < 𝐺, then there is some 𝑧 witnessing this, but we can say more and in fact there is a definable expression 𝑋 that also witnesses 𝐹 < 𝐺. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥‘𝑧) ∈ (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹𝑇𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = ∪ {𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑐) ∈ (𝐺‘𝑐)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑋) ∈ (𝐺‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑋 ∈ 𝑤 → (𝐹‘𝑤) = (𝐺‘𝑤))))
Theorem	cantnflem1a 9606*	Lemma for cantnf 9614. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jun-2015.) (Revised by AV, 2-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥‘𝑧) ∈ (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹𝑇𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = ∪ {𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑐) ∈ (𝐺‘𝑐)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐺 supp ∅))
Theorem	cantnflem1b 9607*	Lemma for cantnf 9614. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jun-2015.) (Revised by AV, 2-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥‘𝑧) ∈ (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹𝑇𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = ∪ {𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑐) ∈ (𝐺‘𝑐)}    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = OrdIso( E , (𝐺 supp ∅))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (suc 𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑂 ∧ (◡𝑂‘𝑋) ⊆ 𝑢)) → 𝑋 ⊆ (𝑂‘𝑢))
Theorem	cantnflem1c 9608*	Lemma for cantnf 9614. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jun-2015.) (Revised by AV, 2-Jul-2019.) (Proof shortened by AV, 4-Apr-2020.)
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥‘𝑧) ∈ (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹𝑇𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = ∪ {𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑐) ∈ (𝐺‘𝑐)}    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = OrdIso( E , (𝐺 supp ∅))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ (suc 𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑂 ∧ (◡𝑂‘𝑋) ⊆ 𝑢)) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ ∅ ∧ (𝑂‘𝑢) ∈ 𝑥)) → 𝑥 ∈ (𝐺 supp ∅))
Theorem	cantnflem1d 9609*	Lemma for cantnf 9614. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jun-2015.) (Revised by AV, 2-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥‘𝑧) ∈ (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹𝑇𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = ∪ {𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑐) ∈ (𝐺‘𝑐)}    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = OrdIso( E , (𝐺 supp ∅))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (((𝐴 ↑o (𝑂‘𝑘)) ·o (𝐺‘(𝑂‘𝑘))) +o 𝑧)), ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 CNF 𝐵)‘(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if(𝑥 ⊆ 𝑋, (𝐹‘𝑥), ∅))) ∈ (𝐻‘suc (◡𝑂‘𝑋)))
Theorem	cantnflem1 9610*	Lemma for cantnf 9614. This part of the proof is showing uniqueness of the Cantor normal form. We already know that the relation 𝑇 is a strict order, but we haven't shown it is a well-order yet. But being a strict order is enough to show that two distinct 𝐹, 𝐺 are 𝑇 -related as 𝐹 < 𝐺 or 𝐺 < 𝐹, and WLOG assuming that 𝐹 < 𝐺, we show that CNF respects this order and maps these two to different ordinals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 2-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥‘𝑧) ∈ (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹𝑇𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = ∪ {𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑐) ∈ (𝐺‘𝑐)}    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = OrdIso( E , (𝐺 supp ∅))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (((𝐴 ↑o (𝑂‘𝑘)) ·o (𝐺‘(𝑂‘𝑘))) +o 𝑧)), ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 CNF 𝐵)‘𝐹) ∈ ((𝐴 CNF 𝐵)‘𝐺))
Theorem	cantnflem2 9611*	Lemma for cantnf 9614. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥‘𝑧) ∈ (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ ran (𝐴 CNF 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∅ ∈ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ (On ∖ 2o) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (On ∖ 1o)))
Theorem	cantnflem3 9612*	Lemma for cantnf 9614. Here we show existence of Cantor normal forms. Assuming (by transfinite induction) that every number less than 𝐶 has a normal form, we can use oeeu 8541 to factor 𝐶 into the form ((𝐴 ↑o 𝑋) ·o 𝑌) +o 𝑍 where 0 < 𝑌 < 𝐴 and 𝑍 < (𝐴 ↑o 𝑋) (and a fortiori 𝑋 < 𝐵). Then since 𝑍 < (𝐴 ↑o 𝑋) ≤ (𝐴 ↑o 𝑋) ·o 𝑌 ≤ 𝐶, 𝑍 has a normal form, and by appending the term (𝐴 ↑o 𝑋) ·o 𝑌 using cantnfp1 9602 we get a normal form for 𝐶. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥‘𝑧) ∈ (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ ran (𝐴 CNF 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∅ ∈ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = ∪ ∩ {𝑐 ∈ On ∣ 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 ↑o 𝑐)}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (℩𝑑∃𝑎 ∈ On ∃𝑏 ∈ (𝐴 ↑o 𝑋)(𝑑 = ⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∧ (((𝐴 ↑o 𝑋) ·o 𝑎) +o 𝑏) = 𝐶))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (1st ‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (2nd ‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 CNF 𝐵)‘𝐺) = 𝑍)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑡 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if(𝑡 = 𝑋, 𝑌, (𝐺‘𝑡)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ran (𝐴 CNF 𝐵))
Theorem	cantnflem4 9613*	Lemma for cantnf 9614. Complete the induction step of cantnflem3 9612. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥‘𝑧) ∈ (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ ran (𝐴 CNF 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∅ ∈ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = ∪ ∩ {𝑐 ∈ On ∣ 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 ↑o 𝑐)}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (℩𝑑∃𝑎 ∈ On ∃𝑏 ∈ (𝐴 ↑o 𝑋)(𝑑 = ⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∧ (((𝐴 ↑o 𝑋) ·o 𝑎) +o 𝑏) = 𝐶))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (1st ‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (2nd ‘𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ran (𝐴 CNF 𝐵))
Theorem	cantnf 9614*	The Cantor Normal Form theorem. The function (𝐴 CNF 𝐵), which maps a finitely supported function from 𝐵 to 𝐴 to the sum ((𝐴 ↑o 𝑓(𝑎1)) ∘ 𝑎1) +o ((𝐴 ↑o 𝑓(𝑎2)) ∘ 𝑎2) +o ... over all indices 𝑎 < 𝐵 such that 𝑓(𝑎) is nonzero, is an order isomorphism from the ordering 𝑇 of finitely supported functions to the set (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵) under the natural order. Setting 𝐴 = ω and letting 𝐵 be arbitrarily large, the surjectivity of this function implies that every ordinal has a Cantor normal form (and injectivity, together with coherence cantnfres 9598, implies that such a representation is unique). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥‘𝑧) ∈ (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 CNF 𝐵) Isom 𝑇, E (𝑆, (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵)))
Theorem	oemapwe 9615*	The lexicographic order on a function space of ordinals gives a well-ordering with order type equal to the ordinal exponential. This provides an alternate definition of the ordinal exponential. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥‘𝑧) ∈ (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 We 𝑆 ∧ dom OrdIso(𝑇, 𝑆) = (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵)))
Theorem	cantnffval2 9616*	An alternate definition of df-cnf 9583 which relies on cantnf 9614. (Note that although the use of 𝑆 seems self-referential, one can use cantnfdm 9585 to eliminate it.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥‘𝑧) ∈ (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 CNF 𝐵) = ◡OrdIso(𝑇, 𝑆))
Theorem	cantnff1o 9617	Simplify the isomorphism of cantnf 9614 to simple bijection. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 CNF 𝐵):𝑆–1-1-onto→(𝐴 ↑o 𝐵))
Theorem	wemapwe 9618*	Construct lexicographic order on a function space based on a reverse well-ordering of the indices and a well-ordering of the values. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 3-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧)𝑆(𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑧𝑅𝑤 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))}    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp 𝑍}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 We 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 We 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ ∅)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = OrdIso(𝑆, 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝐺‘∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 We 𝑈)
Theorem	oef1o 9619*	A bijection of the base sets induces a bijection on ordinal exponentials. (The assumption (𝐹‘∅) = ∅ can be discharged using fveqf1o 7258.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 3-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (On ∖ 1o))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘∅) = ∅)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp ∅} ↦ (𝐹 ∘ (𝑦 ∘ ◡𝐺)))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (((𝐶 CNF 𝐷) ∘ 𝐾) ∘ ◡(𝐴 CNF 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:(𝐴 ↑o 𝐵)–1-1-onto→(𝐶 ↑o 𝐷))
Theorem	cnfcomlem 9620*	Lemma for cnfcom 9621. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 3-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (ω CNF 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (◡(ω CNF 𝐴)‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = OrdIso( E , (𝐹 supp ∅))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝑀 +o 𝑧)), ∅)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑓 ∈ V ↦ 𝐾), ∅)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((ω ↑o (𝐺‘𝑘)) ·o (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑘)))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 ↦ (dom 𝑓 +o 𝑥)) ∪ ◡(𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑓 ↦ (𝑀 +o 𝑥)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ dom 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ (ω ↑o (𝐺‘𝐼)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇‘𝐼):(𝐻‘𝐼)–1-1-onto→𝑂)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇‘suc 𝐼):(𝐻‘suc 𝐼)–1-1-onto→((ω ↑o (𝐺‘𝐼)) ·o (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝐼))))
Theorem	cnfcom 9621*	Any ordinal 𝐵 is equinumerous to the leading term of its Cantor normal form. Here we show that bijection explicitly. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 3-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (ω CNF 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (◡(ω CNF 𝐴)‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = OrdIso( E , (𝐹 supp ∅))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝑀 +o 𝑧)), ∅)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑓 ∈ V ↦ 𝐾), ∅)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((ω ↑o (𝐺‘𝑘)) ·o (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑘)))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 ↦ (dom 𝑓 +o 𝑥)) ∪ ◡(𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑓 ↦ (𝑀 +o 𝑥)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ dom 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇‘suc 𝐼):(𝐻‘suc 𝐼)–1-1-onto→((ω ↑o (𝐺‘𝐼)) ·o (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝐼))))
Theorem	cnfcom2lem 9622*	Lemma for cnfcom2 9623. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 3-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (ω CNF 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (◡(ω CNF 𝐴)‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = OrdIso( E , (𝐹 supp ∅))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝑀 +o 𝑧)), ∅)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑓 ∈ V ↦ 𝐾), ∅)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((ω ↑o (𝐺‘𝑘)) ·o (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑘)))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 ↦ (dom 𝑓 +o 𝑥)) ∪ ◡(𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑓 ↦ (𝑀 +o 𝑥)))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐺‘∪ dom 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∅ ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝐺 = suc ∪ dom 𝐺)
Theorem	cnfcom2 9623*	Any nonzero ordinal 𝐵 is equinumerous to the leading term of its Cantor normal form. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 3-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (ω CNF 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (◡(ω CNF 𝐴)‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = OrdIso( E , (𝐹 supp ∅))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝑀 +o 𝑧)), ∅)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑓 ∈ V ↦ 𝐾), ∅)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((ω ↑o (𝐺‘𝑘)) ·o (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑘)))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 ↦ (dom 𝑓 +o 𝑥)) ∪ ◡(𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑓 ↦ (𝑀 +o 𝑥)))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐺‘∪ dom 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∅ ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇‘dom 𝐺):𝐵–1-1-onto→((ω ↑o 𝑊) ·o (𝐹‘𝑊)))
Theorem	cnfcom3lem 9624*	Lemma for cnfcom3 9625. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 4-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (ω CNF 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (◡(ω CNF 𝐴)‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = OrdIso( E , (𝐹 supp ∅))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝑀 +o 𝑧)), ∅)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑓 ∈ V ↦ 𝐾), ∅)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((ω ↑o (𝐺‘𝑘)) ·o (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑘)))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 ↦ (dom 𝑓 +o 𝑥)) ∪ ◡(𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑓 ↦ (𝑀 +o 𝑥)))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐺‘∪ dom 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ⊆ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ (On ∖ 1o))
Theorem	cnfcom3 9625*	Any infinite ordinal 𝐵 is equinumerous to a power of ω. (We are being careful here to show explicit bijections rather than simple equinumerosity because we want a uniform construction for cnfcom3c 9627.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 4-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (ω CNF 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (◡(ω CNF 𝐴)‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = OrdIso( E , (𝐹 supp ∅))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝑀 +o 𝑧)), ∅)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑓 ∈ V ↦ 𝐾), ∅)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((ω ↑o (𝐺‘𝑘)) ·o (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑘)))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 ↦ (dom 𝑓 +o 𝑥)) ∪ ◡(𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑓 ↦ (𝑀 +o 𝑥)))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐺‘∪ dom 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ⊆ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (𝑢 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑊), 𝑣 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝑊) ↦ (((𝐹‘𝑊) ·o 𝑣) +o 𝑢))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (𝑢 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑊), 𝑣 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝑊) ↦ (((ω ↑o 𝑊) ·o 𝑢) +o 𝑣))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑋 ∘ ◡𝑌) ∘ (𝑇‘dom 𝐺))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁:𝐵–1-1-onto→(ω ↑o 𝑊))
Theorem	cnfcom3clem 9626*	Lemma for cnfcom3c 9627. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 4-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (ω CNF 𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (◡(ω CNF 𝐴)‘𝑏)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = OrdIso( E , (𝐹 supp ∅))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝑀 +o 𝑧)), ∅)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑓 ∈ V ↦ 𝐾), ∅)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((ω ↑o (𝐺‘𝑘)) ·o (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑘)))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 ↦ (dom 𝑓 +o 𝑥)) ∪ ◡(𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑓 ↦ (𝑀 +o 𝑥)))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐺‘∪ dom 𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (𝑢 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑊), 𝑣 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝑊) ↦ (((𝐹‘𝑊) ·o 𝑣) +o 𝑢))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (𝑢 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑊), 𝑣 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝑊) ↦ (((ω ↑o 𝑊) ·o 𝑢) +o 𝑣))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑋 ∘ ◡𝑌) ∘ (𝑇‘dom 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑏 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝐴) ↦ 𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ∃𝑔∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 (ω ⊆ 𝑏 → ∃𝑤 ∈ (On ∖ 1o)(𝑔‘𝑏):𝑏–1-1-onto→(ω ↑o 𝑤)))
Theorem	cnfcom3c 9627*	Wrap the construction of cnfcom3 9625 into an existential quantifier. For any ω ⊆ 𝑏, there is a bijection from 𝑏 to some power of ω. Furthermore, this bijection is canonical , which means that we can find a single function 𝑔 which will give such bijections for every 𝑏 less than some arbitrarily large bound 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ∃𝑔∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 (ω ⊆ 𝑏 → ∃𝑤 ∈ (On ∖ 1o)(𝑔‘𝑏):𝑏–1-1-onto→(ω ↑o 𝑤)))
2.6.4  Transitive closure of a relation
Syntax	cttrcl 9628	Declare the syntax for the transitive closure of a class.
class t++𝑅
Definition	df-ttrcl 9629*	Define the transitive closure of a class. This is the smallest relation containing 𝑅 (or more precisely, the relation (𝑅 ↾ V) induced by 𝑅) and having the transitive property. Definition from [Levy] p. 59, who denotes it as 𝑅∗ and calls it the "ancestral" of 𝑅. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Oct-2024.)
⊢ t++𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ 1o)∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn suc 𝑛 ∧ ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝑥 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑛) = 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑚 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑓‘𝑚)𝑅(𝑓‘suc 𝑚))}
Theorem	ttrcleq 9630	Equality theorem for transitive closure. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → t++𝑅 = t++𝑆)
Theorem	nfttrcld 9631	Bound variable hypothesis builder for transitive closure. Deduction form. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥t++𝑅)
Theorem	nfttrcl 9632	Bound variable hypothesis builder for transitive closure. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Oct-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥t++𝑅
Theorem	relttrcl 9633	The transitive closure of a class is a relation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Oct-2024.)
⊢ Rel t++𝑅
Theorem	brttrcl 9634*	Characterization of elements of the transitive closure of a relation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴t++𝑅𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ 1o)∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn suc 𝑛 ∧ ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑛) = 𝐵) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑓‘𝑎)𝑅(𝑓‘suc 𝑎)))
Theorem	brttrcl2 9635*	Characterization of elements of the transitive closure of a relation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴t++𝑅𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑛 ∈ ω ∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn suc suc 𝑛 ∧ ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑓‘suc 𝑛) = 𝐵) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ suc 𝑛(𝑓‘𝑎)𝑅(𝑓‘suc 𝑎)))
Theorem	ssttrcl 9636	If 𝑅 is a relation, then it is a subclass of its transitive closure. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → 𝑅 ⊆ t++𝑅)
Theorem	ttrcltr 9637	The transitive closure of a class is transitive. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (t++𝑅 ∘ t++𝑅) ⊆ t++𝑅
Theorem	ttrclresv 9638	The transitive closure of 𝑅 restricted to V is the same as the transitive closure of 𝑅 itself. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Oct-2024.)
⊢ t++(𝑅 ↾ V) = t++𝑅
Theorem	ttrclco 9639	Composition law for the transitive closure of a relation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (t++𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ t++𝑅
Theorem	cottrcl 9640	Composition law for the transitive closure of a relation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∘ t++𝑅) ⊆ t++𝑅
Theorem	ttrclss 9641	If 𝑅 is a subclass of 𝑆 and 𝑆 is transitive, then the transitive closure of 𝑅 is a subclass of 𝑆. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Oct-2024.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ⊆ 𝑆 ∧ (𝑆 ∘ 𝑆) ⊆ 𝑆) → t++𝑅 ⊆ 𝑆)
Theorem	dmttrcl 9642	The domain of a transitive closure is the same as the domain of the original class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Oct-2024.)
⊢ dom t++𝑅 = dom 𝑅
Theorem	rnttrcl 9643	The range of a transitive closure is the same as the range of the original class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Oct-2024.)
⊢ ran t++𝑅 = ran 𝑅
Theorem	ttrclexg 9644	If 𝑅 is a set, then so is t++𝑅. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → t++𝑅 ∈ V)
Theorem	dfttrcl2 9645*	When 𝑅 is a set and a relation, then its transitive closure can be defined by an intersection. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Oct-2024.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Rel 𝑅) → t++𝑅 = ∩ {𝑧 ∣ (𝑅 ⊆ 𝑧 ∧ (𝑧 ∘ 𝑧) ⊆ 𝑧)})
Theorem	ttrclselem1 9646*	Lemma for ttrclse 9648. Show that all finite ordinal function values of 𝐹 are subsets of 𝐴. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 31-Oct-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = rec((𝑏 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑏 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤)), Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ω → (𝐹‘𝑁) ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	ttrclselem2 9647*	Lemma for ttrclse 9648. Show that a suc 𝑁 element long chain gives membership in the 𝑁-th predecessor class and vice-versa. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 31-Oct-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = rec((𝑏 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑏 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤)), Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn suc suc 𝑁 ∧ ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝑦 ∧ (𝑓‘suc 𝑁) = 𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ suc 𝑁(𝑓‘𝑎)(𝑅 ↾ 𝐴)(𝑓‘suc 𝑎)) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑁)))
Theorem	ttrclse 9648	If 𝑅 is set-like over 𝐴, then the transitive closure of the restriction of 𝑅 to 𝐴 is set-like over 𝐴. This theorem requires the axioms of infinity and replacement for its proof. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 31-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝑅 Se 𝐴 → t++(𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) Se 𝐴)
2.6.5  Transitive closure
Theorem	trcl 9649*	For any set 𝐴, show the properties of its transitive closure 𝐶. Similar to Theorem 9.1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 73 except that we show an explicit expression for the transitive closure rather than just its existence. See tz9.1 9650 for an abbreviated version showing existence. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (rec((𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝑧 ∪ ∪ 𝑧)), 𝐴) ↾ ω)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ ω (𝐹‘𝑦)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ Tr 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑥((𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ Tr 𝑥) → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝑥))
Theorem	tz9.1 9650*	Every set has a transitive closure (the smallest transitive extension). Theorem 9.1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 73. See trcl 9649 for an explicit expression for the transitive closure. Apparently open problems are whether this theorem can be proved without the Axiom of Infinity; if not, then whether it implies Infinity; and if not, what is the "property" that Infinity has that the other axioms don't have that is weaker than Infinity itself? (Added 22-Mar-2011) The following article seems to answer the first question, that it can't be proved without Infinity, in the affirmative: Mancini, Antonella and Zambella, Domenico (2001). "A note on recursive models of set theories." Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 42(2):109-115. (Thanks to Scott Fenton.) (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2003.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ∃𝑥(𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ Tr 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦((𝐴 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ Tr 𝑦) → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦))
Theorem	tz9.1c 9651*	Alternate expression for the existence of transitive closures tz9.1 9650: the intersection of all transitive sets containing 𝐴 is a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ Tr 𝑥)} ∈ V
Theorem	epfrs 9652*	The strong form of the Axiom of Regularity (no sethood requirement on 𝐴), with the axiom itself present as an antecedent. See also zfregs 9653. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Mar-2013.)
⊢ (( E Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∩ 𝐴) = ∅)
Theorem	zfregs 9653*	The strong form of the Axiom of Regularity, which does not require that 𝐴 be a set. Axiom 6' of [TakeutiZaring] p. 21. See also epfrs 9652. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∩ 𝐴) = ∅)
Theorem	zfregs2 9654*	Alternate strong form of the Axiom of Regularity. Not every element of a nonempty class contains some element of that class. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Oct-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 27-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))
Syntax	ctc 9655	Extend class notation to include the transitive closure function.
class TC
Definition	df-tc 9656*	The transitive closure function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2013.)
⊢ TC = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ ∩ {𝑦 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ Tr 𝑦)})
Theorem	tcvalg 9657*	Value of the transitive closure function. (The fact that this intersection exists is a non-trivial fact that depends on ax-inf 9559; see tz9.1 9650.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (TC‘𝐴) = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ Tr 𝑥)})
Theorem	tcid 9658	Defining property of the transitive closure function: it contains its argument as a subset. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ⊆ (TC‘𝐴))
Theorem	tctr 9659	Defining property of the transitive closure function: it is transitive. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2013.)
⊢ Tr (TC‘𝐴)
Theorem	tcmin 9660	Defining property of the transitive closure function: it is a subset of any transitive class containing 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ Tr 𝐵) → (TC‘𝐴) ⊆ 𝐵))
Theorem	tc2 9661*	A variant of the definition of the transitive closure function, using instead the smallest transitive set containing 𝐴 as a member, gives almost the same set, except that 𝐴 itself must be added because it is not usually a member of (TC‘𝐴) (and it is never a member if 𝐴 is well-founded). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((TC‘𝐴) ∪ {𝐴}) = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ Tr 𝑥)}
Theorem	tcsni 9662	The transitive closure of a singleton. Proof suggested by Gérard Lang. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (TC‘{𝐴}) = ((TC‘𝐴) ∪ {𝐴})
Theorem	tcss 9663	The transitive closure function inherits the subset relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 → (TC‘𝐵) ⊆ (TC‘𝐴))
Theorem	tcel 9664	The transitive closure function converts the element relation to the subset relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → (TC‘𝐵) ⊆ (TC‘𝐴))
Theorem	tcidm 9665	The transitive closure function is idempotent. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (TC‘(TC‘𝐴)) = (TC‘𝐴)
Theorem	tc0 9666	The transitive closure of the empty set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (TC‘∅) = ∅
Theorem	tc00 9667	The transitive closure is empty iff its argument is. Proof suggested by Gérard Lang. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ((TC‘𝐴) = ∅ ↔ 𝐴 = ∅))
2.6.6  Set induction (or epsilon induction)
Theorem	setind 9668*	Set (epsilon) induction. Theorem 5.22 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 21. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2003.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐴 = V)
Theorem	setind2 9669	Set (epsilon) induction, stated compactly. Given as a homework problem in 1992 by George Boolos (1940-1996). (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2003.)
⊢ (𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐴 → 𝐴 = V)
Theorem	setinds 9670*	Principle of set induction (or E-induction). If a property passes from all elements of 𝑥 to 𝑥 itself, then it holds for all 𝑥. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 10-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜑
Theorem	setinds2f 9671*	E induction schema, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 10-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜓 → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜑
Theorem	setinds2 9672*	E induction schema, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 10-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜓 → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜑
2.6.7  Well-Founded Induction
Theorem	frmin 9673*	Every (possibly proper) subclass of a class 𝐴 with a well-founded set-like relation 𝑅 has a minimal element. This is a very strong generalization of tz6.26 6313 and tz7.5 6346. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Feb-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 27-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅)) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 Pred(𝑅, 𝐵, 𝑦) = ∅)
Theorem	frind 9674*	A subclass of a well-founded class 𝐴 with the property that whenever it contains all predecessors of an element of 𝐴 it also contains that element, is equal to 𝐴. Compare wfi 6315 and tfi 7805, which are special cases of this theorem that do not require the axiom of infinity. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Feb-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦) ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵))) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	frinsg 9675*	Well-Founded Induction Schema. If a property passes from all elements less than 𝑦 of a well-founded class 𝐴 to 𝑦 itself (induction hypothesis), then the property holds for all elements of 𝐴. Theorem 5.6(ii) of [Levy] p. 64. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Feb-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → (∀𝑧 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦)[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑 → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	frins 9676*	Well-Founded Induction Schema. If a property passes from all elements less than 𝑦 of a well-founded class 𝐴 to 𝑦 itself (induction hypothesis), then the property holds for all elements of 𝐴. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Feb-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝑅 Fr 𝐴    &   ⊢ 𝑅 Se 𝐴    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → (∀𝑧 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦)[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑 → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑)
Theorem	frins2f 9677*	Well-Founded Induction schema, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Feb-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → (∀𝑧 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦)𝜓 → 𝜑))    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	frins2 9678*	Well-Founded Induction schema, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Feb-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → (∀𝑧 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦)𝜓 → 𝜑))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	frins3 9679*	Well-Founded Induction schema, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Feb-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → (∀𝑧 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦)𝜓 → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜒)
2.6.8  Well-Founded Recursion
Theorem	frr3g 9680*	Functions defined by well-founded recursion are identical up to relation, domain, and characteristic function. General version of frr3 9685. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 10-Feb-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) = (𝑦𝐻(𝐹 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦)))) ∧ (𝐺 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐺‘𝑦) = (𝑦𝐻(𝐺 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦))))) → 𝐹 = 𝐺)
Theorem	frrlem15 9681*	Lemma for general well-founded recursion. Two acceptable functions are compatible. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Sep-2023.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦) ⊆ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝑦𝐺(𝑓 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦))))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = frecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (𝑔 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑥𝑔𝑢 ∧ 𝑥ℎ𝑣) → 𝑢 = 𝑣))
Theorem	frrlem16 9682*	Lemma for general well-founded recursion. Establish a subset relation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Sep-2023.) Revised notion of transitive closure. (Revised by Scott Fenton, 1-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → ∀𝑤 ∈ Pred (t++(𝑅 ↾ 𝐴), 𝐴, 𝑧)Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤) ⊆ Pred(t++(𝑅 ↾ 𝐴), 𝐴, 𝑧))
Theorem	frr1 9683	Law of general well-founded recursion, part one. This theorem and the following two drop the partial order requirement from fpr1 8255, fpr2 8256, and fpr3 8257, which requires using the axiom of infinity. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Sep-2023.)
⊢ 𝐹 = frecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)
Theorem	frr2 9684	Law of general well-founded recursion, part two. Now we establish the value of 𝐹 within 𝐴. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Sep-2023.)
⊢ 𝐹 = frecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = (𝑋𝐺(𝐹 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋))))
Theorem	frr3 9685*	Law of general well-founded recursion, part three. Finally, we show that 𝐹 is unique. We do this by showing that any function 𝐻 with the same properties we proved of 𝐹 in frr1 9683 and frr2 9684 is identical to 𝐹. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Sep-2023.)
⊢ 𝐹 = frecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (𝐻 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘𝑧) = (𝑧𝐺(𝐻 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑧))))) → 𝐹 = 𝐻)
2.6.9  Rank
Syntax	cr1 9686	Extend class definition to include the cumulative hierarchy of sets function.
class 𝑅1
Syntax	crnk 9687	Extend class definition to include rank function.
class rank
Definition	df-r1 9688	Define the cumulative hierarchy of sets function, using Takeuti and Zaring's notation (𝑅1). Starting with the empty set, this function builds up layers of sets where the next layer is the power set of the previous layer (and the union of previous layers when the argument is a limit ordinal). Using the Axiom of Regularity, we can show that any set whatsoever belongs to one of the layers of this hierarchy (see tz9.13 9715). Our definition expresses Definition 9.9 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 76 in a closed form, from which we derive the recursive definition as Theorems r10 9692, r1suc 9694, and r1lim 9696. Theorem r1val1 9710 shows a recursive definition that works for all values, and Theorems r1val2 9761 and r1val3 9762 show the value expressed in terms of rank. Other notations for this function are R with the argument as a subscript (Equation 3.1 of [BellMachover] p. 477), V with a subscript (Definition of [Enderton] p. 202), M with a subscript (Definition 15.19 of [Monk1] p. 113), the capital Greek letter psi (Definition of [Mendelson] p. 281), and bold-face R (Definition 2.1 of [Kunen] p. 95). (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-2003.)
⊢ 𝑅1 = rec((𝑥 ∈ V ↦ 𝒫 𝑥), ∅)
Definition	df-rank 9689*	Define the rank function. See rankval 9740, rankval2 9742, rankval3 9764, or rankval4 9791 its value. The rank is a kind of "inverse" of the cumulative hierarchy of sets function 𝑅1: given a set, it returns an ordinal number telling us the smallest layer of the hierarchy to which the set belongs. Based on Definition 9.14 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 79. Theorem rankid 9757 illustrates the "inverse" concept. Another nice theorem showing the relationship is rankr1a 9760. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2003.)
⊢ rank = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ ∩ {𝑦 ∈ On ∣ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑅1‘suc 𝑦)})
Theorem	r1funlim 9690	The cumulative hierarchy of sets function is a function on a limit ordinal. (This weak form of r1fnon 9691 avoids ax-rep 5226.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (Fun 𝑅1 ∧ Lim dom 𝑅1)
Theorem	r1fnon 9691	The cumulative hierarchy of sets function is a function on the class of ordinal numbers. (Contributed by NM, 5-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2013.)
⊢ 𝑅1 Fn On
Theorem	r10 9692	Value of the cumulative hierarchy of sets function at ∅. Part of Definition 9.9 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 76. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (𝑅1‘∅) = ∅
Theorem	r1sucg 9693	Value of the cumulative hierarchy of sets function at a successor ordinal. Part of Definition 9.9 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 76. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅1 → (𝑅1‘suc 𝐴) = 𝒫 (𝑅1‘𝐴))
Theorem	r1suc 9694	Value of the cumulative hierarchy of sets function at a successor ordinal. Part of Definition 9.9 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 76. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝑅1‘suc 𝐴) = 𝒫 (𝑅1‘𝐴))
Theorem	r1limg 9695*	Value of the cumulative hierarchy of sets function at a limit ordinal. Part of Definition 9.9 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 76. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅1 ∧ Lim 𝐴) → (𝑅1‘𝐴) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑅1‘𝑥))
Theorem	r1lim 9696*	Value of the cumulative hierarchy of sets function at a limit ordinal. Part of Definition 9.9 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 76. (Contributed by NM, 4-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ Lim 𝐴) → (𝑅1‘𝐴) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑅1‘𝑥))
Theorem	r1fin 9697	The first ω levels of the cumulative hierarchy are all finite. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (𝑅1‘𝐴) ∈ Fin)
Theorem	r1sdom 9698	Each stage in the cumulative hierarchy is strictly larger than the last. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑅1‘𝐵) ≺ (𝑅1‘𝐴))
Theorem	r111 9699	The cumulative hierarchy is a one-to-one function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝑅1:On–1-1→V
Theorem	r1tr 9700	The cumulative hierarchy of sets is transitive. Lemma 7T of [Enderton] p. 202. (Contributed by NM, 8-Sep-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ Tr (𝑅1‘𝐴)