![]() |
Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 97 of 479) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Color key: | ![]() (1-30158) |
![]() (30159-31681) |
![]() (31682-47805) |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | elnotel 9601 | A class cannot be an element of one of its elements. (Contributed by AV, 14-Jun-2022.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | elnel 9602 | A class cannot be an element of one of its elements. (Contributed by AV, 14-Jun-2022.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐵 ∉ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | en3lplem1 9603* | Lemma for en3lp 9605. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 28-Oct-2011.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∩ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶}) ≠ ∅)) | ||
Theorem | en3lplem2 9604* | Lemma for en3lp 9605. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 28-Oct-2011.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} → (𝑥 ∩ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶}) ≠ ∅)) | ||
Theorem | en3lp 9605 | No class has 3-cycle membership loops. This proof was automatically generated from the virtual deduction proof en3lpVD 43591 using a translation program. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Oct-2011.) |
⊢ ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | preleqg 9606 | Equality of two unordered pairs when one member of each pair contains the other member. Closed form of preleq 9607. (Contributed by AV, 15-Jun-2022.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ {𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐶, 𝐷}) → (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | preleq 9607 | Equality of two unordered pairs when one member of each pair contains the other member. (Contributed by NM, 16-Oct-1996.) (Revised by AV, 15-Jun-2022.) |
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ {𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐶, 𝐷}) → (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | preleqALT 9608 | Alternate proof of preleq 9607, not based on preleqg 9606: Equality of two unordered pairs when one member of each pair contains the other member. (Contributed by NM, 16-Oct-1996.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ {𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐶, 𝐷}) → (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | opthreg 9609 | Theorem for alternate representation of ordered pairs, requiring the Axiom of Regularity ax-reg 9583 (via the preleq 9607 step). See df-op 4634 for a description of other ordered pair representations. Exercise 34 of [Enderton] p. 207. (Contributed by NM, 16-Oct-1996.) (Proof shortened by AV, 15-Jun-2022.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ({𝐴, {𝐴, 𝐵}} = {𝐶, {𝐶, 𝐷}} ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | suc11reg 9610 | The successor operation behaves like a one-to-one function (assuming the Axiom of Regularity). Exercise 35 of [Enderton] p. 208 and its converse. (Contributed by NM, 25-Oct-2003.) |
⊢ (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | dford2 9611* | Assuming ax-reg 9583, an ordinal is a transitive class on which inclusion satisfies trichotomy. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 27-Oct-2010.) |
⊢ (Ord 𝐴 ↔ (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))) | ||
Theorem | inf0 9612* | Existence of ω implies our axiom of infinity ax-inf 9629. The proof shows that the especially contrived class "ran (rec((𝑣 ∈ V ↦ suc 𝑣), 𝑥) ↾ ω) " exists, is a subset of its union, and contains a given set 𝑥 (and thus is nonempty). Thus, it provides an example demonstrating that a set 𝑦 exists with the necessary properties demanded by ax-inf 9629. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1996.) Revised to closed form. (Revised by BJ, 20-May-2024.) |
⊢ (ω ∈ 𝑉 → ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)))) | ||
Theorem | inf1 9613 | Variation of Axiom of Infinity (using zfinf 9630 as a hypothesis). Axiom of Infinity in [FreydScedrov] p. 283. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-1996.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 1-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ ∃𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → ∃𝑧(𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥))) ⇒ ⊢ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → ∃𝑧(𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥))) | ||
Theorem | inf2 9614* | Variation of Axiom of Infinity. There exists a nonempty set that is a subset of its union (using zfinf 9630 as a hypothesis). Abbreviated version of the Axiom of Infinity in [FreydScedrov] p. 283. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-1996.) |
⊢ ∃𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → ∃𝑧(𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥))) ⇒ ⊢ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ ∪ 𝑥) | ||
Theorem | inf3lema 9615* | Lemma for our Axiom of Infinity => standard Axiom of Infinity. See inf3 9626 for detailed description. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-1996.) |
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑦 ∈ V ↦ {𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑤 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑦}) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (rec(𝐺, ∅) ↾ ω) & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐺‘𝐵) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | inf3lemb 9616* | Lemma for our Axiom of Infinity => standard Axiom of Infinity. See inf3 9626 for detailed description. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-1996.) |
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑦 ∈ V ↦ {𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑤 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑦}) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (rec(𝐺, ∅) ↾ ω) & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹‘∅) = ∅ | ||
Theorem | inf3lemc 9617* | Lemma for our Axiom of Infinity => standard Axiom of Infinity. See inf3 9626 for detailed description. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-1996.) |
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑦 ∈ V ↦ {𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑤 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑦}) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (rec(𝐺, ∅) ↾ ω) & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (𝐹‘suc 𝐴) = (𝐺‘(𝐹‘𝐴))) | ||
Theorem | inf3lemd 9618* | Lemma for our Axiom of Infinity => standard Axiom of Infinity. See inf3 9626 for detailed description. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-1996.) |
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑦 ∈ V ↦ {𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑤 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑦}) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (rec(𝐺, ∅) ↾ ω) & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (𝐹‘𝐴) ⊆ 𝑥) | ||
Theorem | inf3lem1 9619* | Lemma for our Axiom of Infinity => standard Axiom of Infinity. See inf3 9626 for detailed description. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-1996.) |
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑦 ∈ V ↦ {𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑤 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑦}) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (rec(𝐺, ∅) ↾ ω) & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (𝐹‘𝐴) ⊆ (𝐹‘suc 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | inf3lem2 9620* | Lemma for our Axiom of Infinity => standard Axiom of Infinity. See inf3 9626 for detailed description. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-1996.) |
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑦 ∈ V ↦ {𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑤 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑦}) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (rec(𝐺, ∅) ↾ ω) & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑥 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ ∪ 𝑥) → (𝐴 ∈ ω → (𝐹‘𝐴) ≠ 𝑥)) | ||
Theorem | inf3lem3 9621* | Lemma for our Axiom of Infinity => standard Axiom of Infinity. See inf3 9626 for detailed description. In the proof, we invoke the Axiom of Regularity in the form of zfreg 9586. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-1996.) |
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑦 ∈ V ↦ {𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑤 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑦}) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (rec(𝐺, ∅) ↾ ω) & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑥 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ ∪ 𝑥) → (𝐴 ∈ ω → (𝐹‘𝐴) ≠ (𝐹‘suc 𝐴))) | ||
Theorem | inf3lem4 9622* | Lemma for our Axiom of Infinity => standard Axiom of Infinity. See inf3 9626 for detailed description. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-1996.) |
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑦 ∈ V ↦ {𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑤 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑦}) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (rec(𝐺, ∅) ↾ ω) & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑥 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ ∪ 𝑥) → (𝐴 ∈ ω → (𝐹‘𝐴) ⊊ (𝐹‘suc 𝐴))) | ||
Theorem | inf3lem5 9623* | Lemma for our Axiom of Infinity => standard Axiom of Infinity. See inf3 9626 for detailed description. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-1996.) |
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑦 ∈ V ↦ {𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑤 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑦}) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (rec(𝐺, ∅) ↾ ω) & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑥 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ ∪ 𝑥) → ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝐵) ⊊ (𝐹‘𝐴))) | ||
Theorem | inf3lem6 9624* | Lemma for our Axiom of Infinity => standard Axiom of Infinity. See inf3 9626 for detailed description. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-1996.) |
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑦 ∈ V ↦ {𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑤 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑦}) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (rec(𝐺, ∅) ↾ ω) & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑥 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ ∪ 𝑥) → 𝐹:ω–1-1→𝒫 𝑥) | ||
Theorem | inf3lem7 9625* | Lemma for our Axiom of Infinity => standard Axiom of Infinity. See inf3 9626 for detailed description. In the proof, we invoke the Axiom of Replacement in the form of f1dmex 7939. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-1996.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jan-2013.) |
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑦 ∈ V ↦ {𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∣ (𝑤 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑦}) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (rec(𝐺, ∅) ↾ ω) & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑥 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ ∪ 𝑥) → ω ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | inf3 9626 |
Our Axiom of Infinity ax-inf 9629 implies the standard Axiom of Infinity.
The hypothesis is a variant of our Axiom of Infinity provided by
inf2 9614, and the conclusion is the version of the Axiom of Infinity
shown as Axiom 7 in [TakeutiZaring] p. 43. (Other standard versions are
proved later as axinf2 9631 and zfinf2 9633.) The main proof is provided by
inf3lema 9615 through inf3lem7 9625, and this final piece eliminates the
auxiliary hypothesis of inf3lem7 9625. This proof is due to
Ian Sutherland, Richard Heck, and Norman Megill and was posted
on Usenet as shown below. Although the result is not new, the authors
were unable to find a published proof.
(As posted to sci.logic on 30-Oct-1996, with annotations added.) Theorem: The statement "There exists a nonempty set that is a subset of its union" implies the Axiom of Infinity. Proof: Let X be a nonempty set which is a subset of its union; the latter property is equivalent to saying that for any y in X, there exists a z in X such that y is in z. Define by finite recursion a function F:omega-->(power X) such that F_0 = 0 (See inf3lemb 9616.) F_n+1 = {y<X | y^X subset F_n} (See inf3lemc 9617.) Note: ^ means intersect, < means \in ("element of"). (Finite recursion as typically done requires the existence of omega; to avoid this we can just use transfinite recursion restricted to omega. F is a class-term that is not necessarily a set at this point.) Lemma 1. F_n subset F_n+1. (See inf3lem1 9619.) Proof: By induction: F_0 subset F_1. If y < F_n+1, then y^X subset F_n, so if F_n subset F_n+1, then y^X subset F_n+1, so y < F_n+2. Lemma 2. F_n =/= X. (See inf3lem2 9620.) Proof: By induction: F_0 =/= X because X is not empty. Assume F_n =/= X. Then there is a y in X that is not in F_n. By definition of X, there is a z in X that contains y. Suppose F_n+1 = X. Then z is in F_n+1, and z^X contains y, so z^X is not a subset of F_n, contrary to the definition of F_n+1. Lemma 3. F_n =/= F_n+1. (See inf3lem3 9621.) Proof: Using the identity y^X subset F_n <-> y^(X-F_n) = 0, we have F_n+1 = {y<X | y^(X-F_n) = 0}. Let q = {y<X-F_n | y^(X-F_n) = 0}. Then q subset F_n+1. Since X-F_n is not empty by Lemma 2 and q is the set of \in-minimal elements of X-F_n, by Foundation q is not empty, so q and therefore F_n+1 have an element not in F_n. Lemma 4. F_n proper_subset F_n+1. (See inf3lem4 9622.) Proof: Lemmas 1 and 3. Lemma 5. F_m proper_subset F_n, m < n. (See inf3lem5 9623.) Proof: Fix m and use induction on n > m. Basis: F_m proper_subset F_m+1 by Lemma 4. Induction: Assume F_m proper_subset F_n. Then since F_n proper_subset F_n+1, F_m proper_subset F_n+1 by transitivity of proper subset. By Lemma 5, F_m =/= F_n for m =/= n, so F is 1-1. (See inf3lem6 9624.) Thus, the inverse of F is a function with range omega and domain a subset of power X, so omega exists by Replacement. (See inf3lem7 9625.) Q.E.D.(Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-1996.) |
⊢ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ ∪ 𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ ω ∈ V | ||
Theorem | infeq5i 9627 | Half of infeq5 9628. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ (ω ∈ V → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ⊊ ∪ 𝑥) | ||
Theorem | infeq5 9628 | The statement "there exists a set that is a proper subset of its union" is equivalent to the Axiom of Infinity (shown on the right-hand side in the form of omex 9634.) The left-hand side provides us with a very short way to express the Axiom of Infinity using only elementary symbols. This proof of equivalence does not depend on the Axiom of Infinity. (Contributed by NM, 23-Mar-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ⊊ ∪ 𝑥 ↔ ω ∈ V) | ||
Axiom | ax-inf 9629* |
Axiom of Infinity. An axiom of Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory. This axiom
is the gateway to "Cantor's paradise" (an expression coined by
Hilbert).
It asserts that given a starting set 𝑥, an infinite set 𝑦 built
from it exists. Although our version is apparently not given in the
literature, it is similar to, but slightly shorter than, the Axiom of
Infinity in [FreydScedrov] p. 283
(see inf1 9613 and inf2 9614). More
standard versions, which essentially state that there exists a set
containing all the natural numbers, are shown as zfinf2 9633 and omex 9634 and
are based on the (nontrivial) proof of inf3 9626.
This version has the
advantage that when expanded to primitives, it has fewer symbols than
the standard version ax-inf2 9632. Theorem inf0 9612
shows the reverse
derivation of our axiom from a standard one. Theorem inf5 9636
shows a
very short way to state this axiom.
The standard version of Infinity ax-inf2 9632 requires this axiom along with Regularity ax-reg 9583 for its derivation (as Theorem axinf2 9631 below). In order to more easily identify the normal uses of Regularity, we will usually reference ax-inf2 9632 instead of this one. The derivation of this axiom from ax-inf2 9632 is shown by Theorem axinf 9635. Proofs should normally use the standard version ax-inf2 9632 instead of this axiom. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-1993.) |
⊢ ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦))) | ||
Theorem | zfinf 9630* | Axiom of Infinity expressed with the fewest number of different variables. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-2003.) |
⊢ ∃𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → ∃𝑧(𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥))) | ||
Theorem | axinf2 9631* |
A standard version of Axiom of Infinity, expanded to primitives, derived
from our version of Infinity ax-inf 9629 and Regularity ax-reg 9583.
This theorem should not be referenced in any proof. Instead, use ax-inf2 9632 below so that the ordinary uses of Regularity can be more easily identified. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 3-Nov-1996.) |
⊢ ∃𝑥(∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧 ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → ∃𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ (𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦))))) | ||
Axiom | ax-inf2 9632* | A standard version of Axiom of Infinity of ZF set theory. In English, it says: there exists a set that contains the empty set and the successors of all of its members. Theorem zfinf2 9633 shows it converted to abbreviations. This axiom was derived as Theorem axinf2 9631 above, using our version of Infinity ax-inf 9629 and the Axiom of Regularity ax-reg 9583. We will reference ax-inf2 9632 instead of axinf2 9631 so that the ordinary uses of Regularity can be more easily identified. The reverse derivation of ax-inf 9629 from ax-inf2 9632 is shown by Theorem axinf 9635. (Contributed by NM, 3-Nov-1996.) |
⊢ ∃𝑥(∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧 ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → ∃𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ (𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦))))) | ||
Theorem | zfinf2 9633* | A standard version of the Axiom of Infinity, using definitions to abbreviate. Axiom Inf of [BellMachover] p. 472. (See ax-inf2 9632 for the unabbreviated version.) (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-1993.) |
⊢ ∃𝑥(∅ ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 suc 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) | ||
Theorem | omex 9634 |
The existence of omega (the class of natural numbers). Axiom 7 of
[TakeutiZaring] p. 43. Remark
1.21 of [Schloeder] p. 3. This theorem
is proved assuming the Axiom of Infinity and in fact is equivalent to
it, as shown by the reverse derivation inf0 9612.
A finitist (someone who doesn't believe in infinity) could, without contradiction, replace the Axiom of Infinity by its denial ¬ ω ∈ V; this would lead to ω = On by omon 7863 and Fin = V (the universe of all sets) by fineqv 9259. The finitist could still develop natural number, integer, and rational number arithmetic but would be denied the real numbers (as well as much of the rest of mathematics). In deference to the finitist, much of our development is done, when possible, without invoking the Axiom of Infinity; an example is Peano's axioms peano1 7875 through peano5 7880 (which many textbooks prove more easily assuming Infinity). (Contributed by NM, 6-Aug-1994.) |
⊢ ω ∈ V | ||
Theorem | axinf 9635* | The first version of the Axiom of Infinity ax-inf 9629 proved from the second version ax-inf2 9632. Note that we didn't use ax-reg 9583, unlike the other direction axinf2 9631. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2009.) |
⊢ ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑤(𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦))) | ||
Theorem | inf5 9636 | The statement "there exists a set that is a proper subset of its union" is equivalent to the Axiom of Infinity (see Theorem infeq5 9628). This provides us with a very compact way to express the Axiom of Infinity using only elementary symbols. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2005.) |
⊢ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ⊊ ∪ 𝑥 | ||
Theorem | omelon 9637 | Omega is an ordinal number. Theorem 1.22 of [Schloeder] p. 3. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Jan-2013.) |
⊢ ω ∈ On | ||
Theorem | dfom3 9638* | The class of natural numbers ω can be defined as the intersection of all inductive sets (which is the smallest inductive set, since inductive sets are closed under intersection), which is valid provided we assume the Axiom of Infinity. Definition 6.3 of [Eisenberg] p. 82. Definition 1.20 of [Schloeder] p. 3. (Contributed by NM, 6-Aug-1994.) |
⊢ ω = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (∅ ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 suc 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)} | ||
Theorem | elom3 9639* | A simplification of elom 7854 assuming the Axiom of Infinity. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2003.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω ↔ ∀𝑥(Lim 𝑥 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥)) | ||
Theorem | dfom4 9640* | A simplification of df-om 7852 assuming the Axiom of Infinity. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2003.) |
⊢ ω = {𝑥 ∣ ∀𝑦(Lim 𝑦 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦)} | ||
Theorem | dfom5 9641 | ω is the smallest limit ordinal and can be defined as such (although the Axiom of Infinity is needed to ensure that at least one limit ordinal exists). Theorem 1.23 of [Schloeder] p. 4. (Contributed by FL, 22-Feb-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-Feb-2013.) |
⊢ ω = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ Lim 𝑥} | ||
Theorem | oancom 9642 | Ordinal addition is not commutative. This theorem shows a counterexample. Remark in [TakeutiZaring] p. 60. (Contributed by NM, 10-Dec-2004.) |
⊢ (1o +o ω) ≠ (ω +o 1o) | ||
Theorem | isfinite 9643 | A set is finite iff it is strictly dominated by the class of natural number. Theorem 42 of [Suppes] p. 151. The Axiom of Infinity is used for the forward implication. (Contributed by FL, 16-Apr-2011.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin ↔ 𝐴 ≺ ω) | ||
Theorem | fict 9644 | A finite set is countable (weaker version of isfinite 9643). (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Mar-2018.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → 𝐴 ≼ ω) | ||
Theorem | nnsdom 9645 | A natural number is strictly dominated by the set of natural numbers. Example 3 of [Enderton] p. 146. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-2003.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → 𝐴 ≺ ω) | ||
Theorem | omenps 9646 | Omega is equinumerous to a proper subset of itself. Example 13.2(4) of [Eisenberg] p. 216. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-2003.) |
⊢ ω ≈ (ω ∖ {∅}) | ||
Theorem | omensuc 9647 | The set of natural numbers is equinumerous to its successor. (Contributed by NM, 30-Oct-2003.) |
⊢ ω ≈ suc ω | ||
Theorem | infdifsn 9648 | Removing a singleton from an infinite set does not change the cardinality of the set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-May-2015.) |
⊢ (ω ≼ 𝐴 → (𝐴 ∖ {𝐵}) ≈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | infdiffi 9649 | Removing a finite set from an infinite set does not change the cardinality of the set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ ((ω ≼ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Fin) → (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ≈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | unbnn3 9650* | Any unbounded subset of natural numbers is equinumerous to the set of all natural numbers. This version of unbnn 9295 eliminates its hypothesis by assuming the Axiom of Infinity. (Contributed by NM, 4-May-2005.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ω ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ω ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦) → 𝐴 ≈ ω) | ||
Theorem | noinfep 9651* | Using the Axiom of Regularity in the form zfregfr 9596, show that there are no infinite descending ∈-chains. Proposition 7.34 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 44. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jan-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Mar-2013.) |
⊢ ∃𝑥 ∈ ω (𝐹‘suc 𝑥) ∉ (𝐹‘𝑥) | ||
Syntax | ccnf 9652 | Extend class notation with the Cantor normal form function. |
class CNF | ||
Definition | df-cnf 9653* | Define the Cantor normal form function, which takes as input a finitely supported function from 𝑦 to 𝑥 and outputs the corresponding member of the ordinal exponential 𝑥 ↑o 𝑦. The content of the original Cantor Normal Form theorem is that for 𝑥 = ω this function is a bijection onto ω ↑o 𝑦 for any ordinal 𝑦 (or, since the function restricts naturally to different ordinals, the statement that the composite function is a bijection to On). More can be said about the function, however, and in particular it is an order isomorphism for a certain easily defined well-ordering of the finitely supported functions, which gives an alternate definition cantnffval2 9686 of this function in terms of df-oi 9501. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 28-Jun-2019.) |
⊢ CNF = (𝑥 ∈ On, 𝑦 ∈ On ↦ (𝑓 ∈ {𝑔 ∈ (𝑥 ↑m 𝑦) ∣ 𝑔 finSupp ∅} ↦ ⦋OrdIso( E , (𝑓 supp ∅)) / ℎ⦌(seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (((𝑥 ↑o (ℎ‘𝑘)) ·o (𝑓‘(ℎ‘𝑘))) +o 𝑧)), ∅)‘dom ℎ))) | ||
Theorem | cantnffval 9654* | The value of the Cantor normal form function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 28-Jun-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑔 ∈ (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵) ∣ 𝑔 finSupp ∅} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 CNF 𝐵) = (𝑓 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ ⦋OrdIso( E , (𝑓 supp ∅)) / ℎ⦌(seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (((𝐴 ↑o (ℎ‘𝑘)) ·o (𝑓‘(ℎ‘𝑘))) +o 𝑧)), ∅)‘dom ℎ))) | ||
Theorem | cantnfdm 9655* | The domain of the Cantor normal form function (in later lemmas we will use dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵) to abbreviate "the set of finitely supported functions from 𝐵 to 𝐴"). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 28-Jun-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑔 ∈ (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵) ∣ 𝑔 finSupp ∅} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵) = 𝑆) | ||
Theorem | cantnfvalf 9656* | Lemma for cantnf 9684. The function appearing in cantnfval 9659 is unconditionally a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝐶 +o 𝐷)), ∅) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐹:ω⟶On | ||
Theorem | cantnfs 9657 | Elementhood in the set of finitely supported functions from 𝐵 to 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 28-Jun-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ 𝑆 ↔ (𝐹:𝐵⟶𝐴 ∧ 𝐹 finSupp ∅))) | ||
Theorem | cantnfcl 9658 | Basic properties of the order isomorphism 𝐺 used later. The support of an 𝐹 ∈ 𝑆 is a finite subset of 𝐴, so it is well-ordered by E and the order isomorphism has domain a finite ordinal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 28-Jun-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On) & ⊢ 𝐺 = OrdIso( E , (𝐹 supp ∅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ( E We (𝐹 supp ∅) ∧ dom 𝐺 ∈ ω)) | ||
Theorem | cantnfval 9659* | The value of the Cantor normal form function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 28-Jun-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On) & ⊢ 𝐺 = OrdIso( E , (𝐹 supp ∅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐻 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (((𝐴 ↑o (𝐺‘𝑘)) ·o (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑘))) +o 𝑧)), ∅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 CNF 𝐵)‘𝐹) = (𝐻‘dom 𝐺)) | ||
Theorem | cantnfval2 9660* | Alternate expression for the value of the Cantor normal form function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 28-Jun-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On) & ⊢ 𝐺 = OrdIso( E , (𝐹 supp ∅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐻 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (((𝐴 ↑o (𝐺‘𝑘)) ·o (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑘))) +o 𝑧)), ∅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 CNF 𝐵)‘𝐹) = (seqω((𝑘 ∈ dom 𝐺, 𝑧 ∈ On ↦ (((𝐴 ↑o (𝐺‘𝑘)) ·o (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑘))) +o 𝑧)), ∅)‘dom 𝐺)) | ||
Theorem | cantnfsuc 9661* | The value of the recursive function 𝐻 at a successor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 28-Jun-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On) & ⊢ 𝐺 = OrdIso( E , (𝐹 supp ∅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐻 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (((𝐴 ↑o (𝐺‘𝑘)) ·o (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑘))) +o 𝑧)), ∅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐾 ∈ ω) → (𝐻‘suc 𝐾) = (((𝐴 ↑o (𝐺‘𝐾)) ·o (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝐾))) +o (𝐻‘𝐾))) | ||
Theorem | cantnfle 9662* | A lower bound on the CNF function. Since ((𝐴 CNF 𝐵)‘𝐹) is defined as the sum of (𝐴 ↑o 𝑥) ·o (𝐹‘𝑥) over all 𝑥 in the support of 𝐹, it is larger than any of these terms (and all other terms are zero, so we can extend the statement to all 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵 instead of just those 𝐶 in the support). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 28-Jun-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On) & ⊢ 𝐺 = OrdIso( E , (𝐹 supp ∅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐻 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (((𝐴 ↑o (𝐺‘𝑘)) ·o (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑘))) +o 𝑧)), ∅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ↑o 𝐶) ·o (𝐹‘𝐶)) ⊆ ((𝐴 CNF 𝐵)‘𝐹)) | ||
Theorem | cantnflt 9663* | An upper bound on the partial sums of the CNF function. Since each term dominates all previous terms, by induction we can bound the whole sum with any exponent 𝐴 ↑o 𝐶 where 𝐶 is larger than any exponent (𝐺‘𝑥), 𝑥 ∈ 𝐾 which has been summed so far. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 29-Jun-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On) & ⊢ 𝐺 = OrdIso( E , (𝐹 supp ∅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐻 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (((𝐴 ↑o (𝐺‘𝑘)) ·o (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑘))) +o 𝑧)), ∅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∅ ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ suc dom 𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 “ 𝐾) ⊆ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻‘𝐾) ∈ (𝐴 ↑o 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | cantnflt2 9664 | An upper bound on the CNF function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 29-Jun-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∅ ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 supp ∅) ⊆ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 CNF 𝐵)‘𝐹) ∈ (𝐴 ↑o 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | cantnff 9665 | The CNF function is a function from finitely supported functions from 𝐵 to 𝐴, to the ordinal exponential 𝐴 ↑o 𝐵. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 CNF 𝐵):𝑆⟶(𝐴 ↑o 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | cantnf0 9666 | The value of the zero function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∅ ∈ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 CNF 𝐵)‘(𝐵 × {∅})) = ∅) | ||
Theorem | cantnfrescl 9667* | A function is finitely supported from 𝐵 to 𝐴 iff the extended function is finitely supported from 𝐷 to 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-May-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐷) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ (𝐷 ∖ 𝐵)) → 𝑋 = ∅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∅ ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ 𝑇 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝑋) ∈ 𝑆 ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝑋) ∈ 𝑇)) | ||
Theorem | cantnfres 9668* | The CNF function respects extensions of the domain to a larger ordinal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-May-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐷) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ (𝐷 ∖ 𝐵)) → 𝑋 = ∅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∅ ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ 𝑇 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑛 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝑋) ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 CNF 𝐵)‘(𝑛 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝑋)) = ((𝐴 CNF 𝐷)‘(𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝑋))) | ||
Theorem | cantnfp1lem1 9669* | Lemma for cantnfp1 9672. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jun-2015.) (Revised by AV, 30-Jun-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 supp ∅) ⊆ 𝑋) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑡 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if(𝑡 = 𝑋, 𝑌, (𝐺‘𝑡))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑆) | ||
Theorem | cantnfp1lem2 9670* | Lemma for cantnfp1 9672. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 30-Jun-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 supp ∅) ⊆ 𝑋) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑡 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if(𝑡 = 𝑋, 𝑌, (𝐺‘𝑡))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∅ ∈ 𝑌) & ⊢ 𝑂 = OrdIso( E , (𝐹 supp ∅)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝑂 = suc ∪ dom 𝑂) | ||
Theorem | cantnfp1lem3 9671* | Lemma for cantnfp1 9672. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 1-Jul-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 supp ∅) ⊆ 𝑋) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑡 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if(𝑡 = 𝑋, 𝑌, (𝐺‘𝑡))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∅ ∈ 𝑌) & ⊢ 𝑂 = OrdIso( E , (𝐹 supp ∅)) & ⊢ 𝐻 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (((𝐴 ↑o (𝑂‘𝑘)) ·o (𝐹‘(𝑂‘𝑘))) +o 𝑧)), ∅) & ⊢ 𝐾 = OrdIso( E , (𝐺 supp ∅)) & ⊢ 𝑀 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (((𝐴 ↑o (𝐾‘𝑘)) ·o (𝐺‘(𝐾‘𝑘))) +o 𝑧)), ∅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 CNF 𝐵)‘𝐹) = (((𝐴 ↑o 𝑋) ·o 𝑌) +o ((𝐴 CNF 𝐵)‘𝐺))) | ||
Theorem | cantnfp1 9672* | If 𝐹 is created by adding a single term (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝑌 to 𝐺, where 𝑋 is larger than any element of the support of 𝐺, then 𝐹 is also a finitely supported function and it is assigned the value ((𝐴 ↑o 𝑋) ·o 𝑌) +o 𝑧 where 𝑧 is the value of 𝐺. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 1-Jul-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 supp ∅) ⊆ 𝑋) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑡 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if(𝑡 = 𝑋, 𝑌, (𝐺‘𝑡))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ ((𝐴 CNF 𝐵)‘𝐹) = (((𝐴 ↑o 𝑋) ·o 𝑌) +o ((𝐴 CNF 𝐵)‘𝐺)))) | ||
Theorem | oemapso 9673* | The relation 𝑇 is a strict order on 𝑆 (a corollary of wemapso2 9544). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On) & ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥‘𝑧) ∈ (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))} ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 Or 𝑆) | ||
Theorem | oemapval 9674* | Value of the relation 𝑇. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On) & ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥‘𝑧) ∈ (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹𝑇𝐺 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐹‘𝑧) ∈ (𝐺‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 → (𝐹‘𝑤) = (𝐺‘𝑤))))) | ||
Theorem | oemapvali 9675* | If 𝐹 < 𝐺, then there is some 𝑧 witnessing this, but we can say more and in fact there is a definable expression 𝑋 that also witnesses 𝐹 < 𝐺. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-May-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On) & ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥‘𝑧) ∈ (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹𝑇𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ∪ {𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑐) ∈ (𝐺‘𝑐)} ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑋) ∈ (𝐺‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑋 ∈ 𝑤 → (𝐹‘𝑤) = (𝐺‘𝑤)))) | ||
Theorem | cantnflem1a 9676* | Lemma for cantnf 9684. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jun-2015.) (Revised by AV, 2-Jul-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On) & ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥‘𝑧) ∈ (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹𝑇𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ∪ {𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑐) ∈ (𝐺‘𝑐)} ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐺 supp ∅)) | ||
Theorem | cantnflem1b 9677* | Lemma for cantnf 9684. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jun-2015.) (Revised by AV, 2-Jul-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On) & ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥‘𝑧) ∈ (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹𝑇𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ∪ {𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑐) ∈ (𝐺‘𝑐)} & ⊢ 𝑂 = OrdIso( E , (𝐺 supp ∅)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (suc 𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑂 ∧ (◡𝑂‘𝑋) ⊆ 𝑢)) → 𝑋 ⊆ (𝑂‘𝑢)) | ||
Theorem | cantnflem1c 9678* | Lemma for cantnf 9684. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jun-2015.) (Revised by AV, 2-Jul-2019.) (Proof shortened by AV, 4-Apr-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On) & ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥‘𝑧) ∈ (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹𝑇𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ∪ {𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑐) ∈ (𝐺‘𝑐)} & ⊢ 𝑂 = OrdIso( E , (𝐺 supp ∅)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ (suc 𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑂 ∧ (◡𝑂‘𝑋) ⊆ 𝑢)) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ ∅ ∧ (𝑂‘𝑢) ∈ 𝑥)) → 𝑥 ∈ (𝐺 supp ∅)) | ||
Theorem | cantnflem1d 9679* | Lemma for cantnf 9684. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jun-2015.) (Revised by AV, 2-Jul-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On) & ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥‘𝑧) ∈ (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹𝑇𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ∪ {𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑐) ∈ (𝐺‘𝑐)} & ⊢ 𝑂 = OrdIso( E , (𝐺 supp ∅)) & ⊢ 𝐻 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (((𝐴 ↑o (𝑂‘𝑘)) ·o (𝐺‘(𝑂‘𝑘))) +o 𝑧)), ∅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 CNF 𝐵)‘(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if(𝑥 ⊆ 𝑋, (𝐹‘𝑥), ∅))) ∈ (𝐻‘suc (◡𝑂‘𝑋))) | ||
Theorem | cantnflem1 9680* | Lemma for cantnf 9684. This part of the proof is showing uniqueness of the Cantor normal form. We already know that the relation 𝑇 is a strict order, but we haven't shown it is a well-order yet. But being a strict order is enough to show that two distinct 𝐹, 𝐺 are 𝑇 -related as 𝐹 < 𝐺 or 𝐺 < 𝐹, and WLOG assuming that 𝐹 < 𝐺, we show that CNF respects this order and maps these two to different ordinals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 2-Jul-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On) & ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥‘𝑧) ∈ (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹𝑇𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ∪ {𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑐) ∈ (𝐺‘𝑐)} & ⊢ 𝑂 = OrdIso( E , (𝐺 supp ∅)) & ⊢ 𝐻 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (((𝐴 ↑o (𝑂‘𝑘)) ·o (𝐺‘(𝑂‘𝑘))) +o 𝑧)), ∅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 CNF 𝐵)‘𝐹) ∈ ((𝐴 CNF 𝐵)‘𝐺)) | ||
Theorem | cantnflem2 9681* | Lemma for cantnf 9684. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On) & ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥‘𝑧) ∈ (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ ran (𝐴 CNF 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∅ ∈ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ (On ∖ 2o) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (On ∖ 1o))) | ||
Theorem | cantnflem3 9682* | Lemma for cantnf 9684. Here we show existence of Cantor normal forms. Assuming (by transfinite induction) that every number less than 𝐶 has a normal form, we can use oeeu 8599 to factor 𝐶 into the form ((𝐴 ↑o 𝑋) ·o 𝑌) +o 𝑍 where 0 < 𝑌 < 𝐴 and 𝑍 < (𝐴 ↑o 𝑋) (and a fortiori 𝑋 < 𝐵). Then since 𝑍 < (𝐴 ↑o 𝑋) ≤ (𝐴 ↑o 𝑋) ·o 𝑌 ≤ 𝐶, 𝑍 has a normal form, and by appending the term (𝐴 ↑o 𝑋) ·o 𝑌 using cantnfp1 9672 we get a normal form for 𝐶. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On) & ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥‘𝑧) ∈ (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ ran (𝐴 CNF 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∅ ∈ 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ∪ ∩ {𝑐 ∈ On ∣ 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 ↑o 𝑐)} & ⊢ 𝑃 = (℩𝑑∃𝑎 ∈ On ∃𝑏 ∈ (𝐴 ↑o 𝑋)(𝑑 = ⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∧ (((𝐴 ↑o 𝑋) ·o 𝑎) +o 𝑏) = 𝐶)) & ⊢ 𝑌 = (1st ‘𝑃) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (2nd ‘𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 CNF 𝐵)‘𝐺) = 𝑍) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑡 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if(𝑡 = 𝑋, 𝑌, (𝐺‘𝑡))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ran (𝐴 CNF 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | cantnflem4 9683* | Lemma for cantnf 9684. Complete the induction step of cantnflem3 9682. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-May-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On) & ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥‘𝑧) ∈ (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ ran (𝐴 CNF 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∅ ∈ 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑋 = ∪ ∩ {𝑐 ∈ On ∣ 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 ↑o 𝑐)} & ⊢ 𝑃 = (℩𝑑∃𝑎 ∈ On ∃𝑏 ∈ (𝐴 ↑o 𝑋)(𝑑 = ⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∧ (((𝐴 ↑o 𝑋) ·o 𝑎) +o 𝑏) = 𝐶)) & ⊢ 𝑌 = (1st ‘𝑃) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (2nd ‘𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ran (𝐴 CNF 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | cantnf 9684* | The Cantor Normal Form theorem. The function (𝐴 CNF 𝐵), which maps a finitely supported function from 𝐵 to 𝐴 to the sum ((𝐴 ↑o 𝑓(𝑎1)) ∘ 𝑎1) +o ((𝐴 ↑o 𝑓(𝑎2)) ∘ 𝑎2) +o ... over all indices 𝑎 < 𝐵 such that 𝑓(𝑎) is nonzero, is an order isomorphism from the ordering 𝑇 of finitely supported functions to the set (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵) under the natural order. Setting 𝐴 = ω and letting 𝐵 be arbitrarily large, the surjectivity of this function implies that every ordinal has a Cantor normal form (and injectivity, together with coherence cantnfres 9668, implies that such a representation is unique). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On) & ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥‘𝑧) ∈ (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))} ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 CNF 𝐵) Isom 𝑇, E (𝑆, (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | oemapwe 9685* | The lexicographic order on a function space of ordinals gives a well-ordering with order type equal to the ordinal exponential. This provides an alternate definition of the ordinal exponential. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On) & ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥‘𝑧) ∈ (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))} ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 We 𝑆 ∧ dom OrdIso(𝑇, 𝑆) = (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | cantnffval2 9686* | An alternate definition of df-cnf 9653 which relies on cantnf 9684. (Note that although the use of 𝑆 seems self-referential, one can use cantnfdm 9655 to eliminate it.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On) & ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥‘𝑧) ∈ (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))} ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 CNF 𝐵) = ◡OrdIso(𝑇, 𝑆)) | ||
Theorem | cantnff1o 9687 | Simplify the isomorphism of cantnf 9684 to simple bijection. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 CNF 𝐵):𝑆–1-1-onto→(𝐴 ↑o 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | wemapwe 9688* | Construct lexicographic order on a function space based on a reverse well-ordering of the indices and a well-ordering of the values. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 3-Jul-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧)𝑆(𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑧𝑅𝑤 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))} & ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp 𝑍} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 We 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 We 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ ∅) & ⊢ 𝐹 = OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐺 = OrdIso(𝑆, 𝐵) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝐺‘∅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 We 𝑈) | ||
Theorem | oef1o 9689* | A bijection of the base sets induces a bijection on ordinal exponentials. (The assumption (𝐹‘∅) = ∅ can be discharged using fveqf1o 7297.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 3-Jul-2019.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (On ∖ 1o)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘∅) = ∅) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp ∅} ↦ (𝐹 ∘ (𝑦 ∘ ◡𝐺))) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (((𝐶 CNF 𝐷) ∘ 𝐾) ∘ ◡(𝐴 CNF 𝐵)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:(𝐴 ↑o 𝐵)–1-1-onto→(𝐶 ↑o 𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | cnfcomlem 9690* | Lemma for cnfcom 9691. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 3-Jul-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (ω CNF 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝐴)) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (◡(ω CNF 𝐴)‘𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐺 = OrdIso( E , (𝐹 supp ∅)) & ⊢ 𝐻 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝑀 +o 𝑧)), ∅) & ⊢ 𝑇 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑓 ∈ V ↦ 𝐾), ∅) & ⊢ 𝑀 = ((ω ↑o (𝐺‘𝑘)) ·o (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑘))) & ⊢ 𝐾 = ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 ↦ (dom 𝑓 +o 𝑥)) ∪ ◡(𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑓 ↦ (𝑀 +o 𝑥))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ dom 𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ (ω ↑o (𝐺‘𝐼))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇‘𝐼):(𝐻‘𝐼)–1-1-onto→𝑂) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇‘suc 𝐼):(𝐻‘suc 𝐼)–1-1-onto→((ω ↑o (𝐺‘𝐼)) ·o (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝐼)))) | ||
Theorem | cnfcom 9691* | Any ordinal 𝐵 is equinumerous to the leading term of its Cantor normal form. Here we show that bijection explicitly. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 3-Jul-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (ω CNF 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝐴)) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (◡(ω CNF 𝐴)‘𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐺 = OrdIso( E , (𝐹 supp ∅)) & ⊢ 𝐻 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝑀 +o 𝑧)), ∅) & ⊢ 𝑇 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑓 ∈ V ↦ 𝐾), ∅) & ⊢ 𝑀 = ((ω ↑o (𝐺‘𝑘)) ·o (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑘))) & ⊢ 𝐾 = ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 ↦ (dom 𝑓 +o 𝑥)) ∪ ◡(𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑓 ↦ (𝑀 +o 𝑥))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ dom 𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇‘suc 𝐼):(𝐻‘suc 𝐼)–1-1-onto→((ω ↑o (𝐺‘𝐼)) ·o (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝐼)))) | ||
Theorem | cnfcom2lem 9692* | Lemma for cnfcom2 9693. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 3-Jul-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (ω CNF 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝐴)) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (◡(ω CNF 𝐴)‘𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐺 = OrdIso( E , (𝐹 supp ∅)) & ⊢ 𝐻 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝑀 +o 𝑧)), ∅) & ⊢ 𝑇 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑓 ∈ V ↦ 𝐾), ∅) & ⊢ 𝑀 = ((ω ↑o (𝐺‘𝑘)) ·o (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑘))) & ⊢ 𝐾 = ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 ↦ (dom 𝑓 +o 𝑥)) ∪ ◡(𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑓 ↦ (𝑀 +o 𝑥))) & ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐺‘∪ dom 𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∅ ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝐺 = suc ∪ dom 𝐺) | ||
Theorem | cnfcom2 9693* | Any nonzero ordinal 𝐵 is equinumerous to the leading term of its Cantor normal form. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 3-Jul-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (ω CNF 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝐴)) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (◡(ω CNF 𝐴)‘𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐺 = OrdIso( E , (𝐹 supp ∅)) & ⊢ 𝐻 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝑀 +o 𝑧)), ∅) & ⊢ 𝑇 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑓 ∈ V ↦ 𝐾), ∅) & ⊢ 𝑀 = ((ω ↑o (𝐺‘𝑘)) ·o (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑘))) & ⊢ 𝐾 = ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 ↦ (dom 𝑓 +o 𝑥)) ∪ ◡(𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑓 ↦ (𝑀 +o 𝑥))) & ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐺‘∪ dom 𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∅ ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇‘dom 𝐺):𝐵–1-1-onto→((ω ↑o 𝑊) ·o (𝐹‘𝑊))) | ||
Theorem | cnfcom3lem 9694* | Lemma for cnfcom3 9695. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 4-Jul-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (ω CNF 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝐴)) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (◡(ω CNF 𝐴)‘𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐺 = OrdIso( E , (𝐹 supp ∅)) & ⊢ 𝐻 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝑀 +o 𝑧)), ∅) & ⊢ 𝑇 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑓 ∈ V ↦ 𝐾), ∅) & ⊢ 𝑀 = ((ω ↑o (𝐺‘𝑘)) ·o (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑘))) & ⊢ 𝐾 = ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 ↦ (dom 𝑓 +o 𝑥)) ∪ ◡(𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑓 ↦ (𝑀 +o 𝑥))) & ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐺‘∪ dom 𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ⊆ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ (On ∖ 1o)) | ||
Theorem | cnfcom3 9695* | Any infinite ordinal 𝐵 is equinumerous to a power of ω. (We are being careful here to show explicit bijections rather than simple equinumerosity because we want a uniform construction for cnfcom3c 9697.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 4-Jul-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (ω CNF 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝐴)) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (◡(ω CNF 𝐴)‘𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐺 = OrdIso( E , (𝐹 supp ∅)) & ⊢ 𝐻 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝑀 +o 𝑧)), ∅) & ⊢ 𝑇 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑓 ∈ V ↦ 𝐾), ∅) & ⊢ 𝑀 = ((ω ↑o (𝐺‘𝑘)) ·o (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑘))) & ⊢ 𝐾 = ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 ↦ (dom 𝑓 +o 𝑥)) ∪ ◡(𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑓 ↦ (𝑀 +o 𝑥))) & ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐺‘∪ dom 𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ⊆ 𝐵) & ⊢ 𝑋 = (𝑢 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑊), 𝑣 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝑊) ↦ (((𝐹‘𝑊) ·o 𝑣) +o 𝑢)) & ⊢ 𝑌 = (𝑢 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑊), 𝑣 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝑊) ↦ (((ω ↑o 𝑊) ·o 𝑢) +o 𝑣)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑋 ∘ ◡𝑌) ∘ (𝑇‘dom 𝐺)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁:𝐵–1-1-onto→(ω ↑o 𝑊)) | ||
Theorem | cnfcom3clem 9696* | Lemma for cnfcom3c 9697. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 4-Jul-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (ω CNF 𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (◡(ω CNF 𝐴)‘𝑏) & ⊢ 𝐺 = OrdIso( E , (𝐹 supp ∅)) & ⊢ 𝐻 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝑀 +o 𝑧)), ∅) & ⊢ 𝑇 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑓 ∈ V ↦ 𝐾), ∅) & ⊢ 𝑀 = ((ω ↑o (𝐺‘𝑘)) ·o (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑘))) & ⊢ 𝐾 = ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 ↦ (dom 𝑓 +o 𝑥)) ∪ ◡(𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑓 ↦ (𝑀 +o 𝑥))) & ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐺‘∪ dom 𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑋 = (𝑢 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑊), 𝑣 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝑊) ↦ (((𝐹‘𝑊) ·o 𝑣) +o 𝑢)) & ⊢ 𝑌 = (𝑢 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑊), 𝑣 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝑊) ↦ (((ω ↑o 𝑊) ·o 𝑢) +o 𝑣)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑋 ∘ ◡𝑌) ∘ (𝑇‘dom 𝐺)) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑏 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝐴) ↦ 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ∃𝑔∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 (ω ⊆ 𝑏 → ∃𝑤 ∈ (On ∖ 1o)(𝑔‘𝑏):𝑏–1-1-onto→(ω ↑o 𝑤))) | ||
Theorem | cnfcom3c 9697* | Wrap the construction of cnfcom3 9695 into an existential quantifier. For any ω ⊆ 𝑏, there is a bijection from 𝑏 to some power of ω. Furthermore, this bijection is canonical , which means that we can find a single function 𝑔 which will give such bijections for every 𝑏 less than some arbitrarily large bound 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ∃𝑔∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 (ω ⊆ 𝑏 → ∃𝑤 ∈ (On ∖ 1o)(𝑔‘𝑏):𝑏–1-1-onto→(ω ↑o 𝑤))) | ||
Syntax | cttrcl 9698 | Declare the syntax for the transitive closure of a class. |
class t++𝑅 | ||
Definition | df-ttrcl 9699* | Define the transitive closure of a class. This is the smallest relation containing 𝑅 (or more precisely, the relation (𝑅 ↾ V) induced by 𝑅) and having the transitive property. Definition from [Levy] p. 59, who denotes it as 𝑅∗ and calls it the "ancestral" of 𝑅. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Oct-2024.) |
⊢ t++𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ 1o)∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn suc 𝑛 ∧ ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝑥 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑛) = 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑚 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑓‘𝑚)𝑅(𝑓‘suc 𝑚))} | ||
Theorem | ttrcleq 9700 | Equality theorem for transitive closure. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Oct-2024.) |
⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → t++𝑅 = t++𝑆) |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |