P. 97 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 9601-9700   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	cantnflem1b 9601*	Lemma for cantnf 9608. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jun-2015.) (Revised by AV, 2-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥‘𝑧) ∈ (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹𝑇𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = ∪ {𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑐) ∈ (𝐺‘𝑐)}    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = OrdIso( E , (𝐺 supp ∅))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (suc 𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑂 ∧ (◡𝑂‘𝑋) ⊆ 𝑢)) → 𝑋 ⊆ (𝑂‘𝑢))
Theorem	cantnflem1c 9602*	Lemma for cantnf 9608. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jun-2015.) (Revised by AV, 2-Jul-2019.) (Proof shortened by AV, 4-Apr-2020.)
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥‘𝑧) ∈ (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹𝑇𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = ∪ {𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑐) ∈ (𝐺‘𝑐)}    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = OrdIso( E , (𝐺 supp ∅))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ (suc 𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑂 ∧ (◡𝑂‘𝑋) ⊆ 𝑢)) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ ∅ ∧ (𝑂‘𝑢) ∈ 𝑥)) → 𝑥 ∈ (𝐺 supp ∅))
Theorem	cantnflem1d 9603*	Lemma for cantnf 9608. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jun-2015.) (Revised by AV, 2-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥‘𝑧) ∈ (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹𝑇𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = ∪ {𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑐) ∈ (𝐺‘𝑐)}    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = OrdIso( E , (𝐺 supp ∅))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (((𝐴 ↑o (𝑂‘𝑘)) ·o (𝐺‘(𝑂‘𝑘))) +o 𝑧)), ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 CNF 𝐵)‘(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if(𝑥 ⊆ 𝑋, (𝐹‘𝑥), ∅))) ∈ (𝐻‘suc (◡𝑂‘𝑋)))
Theorem	cantnflem1 9604*	Lemma for cantnf 9608. This part of the proof is showing uniqueness of the Cantor normal form. We already know that the relation 𝑇 is a strict order, but we haven't shown it is a well-order yet. But being a strict order is enough to show that two distinct 𝐹, 𝐺 are 𝑇 -related as 𝐹 < 𝐺 or 𝐺 < 𝐹, and WLOG assuming that 𝐹 < 𝐺, we show that CNF respects this order and maps these two to different ordinals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 2-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥‘𝑧) ∈ (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹𝑇𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = ∪ {𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑐) ∈ (𝐺‘𝑐)}    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = OrdIso( E , (𝐺 supp ∅))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (((𝐴 ↑o (𝑂‘𝑘)) ·o (𝐺‘(𝑂‘𝑘))) +o 𝑧)), ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 CNF 𝐵)‘𝐹) ∈ ((𝐴 CNF 𝐵)‘𝐺))
Theorem	cantnflem2 9605*	Lemma for cantnf 9608. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥‘𝑧) ∈ (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ ran (𝐴 CNF 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∅ ∈ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ (On ∖ 2o) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (On ∖ 1o)))
Theorem	cantnflem3 9606*	Lemma for cantnf 9608. Here we show existence of Cantor normal forms. Assuming (by transfinite induction) that every number less than 𝐶 has a normal form, we can use oeeu 8528 to factor 𝐶 into the form ((𝐴 ↑o 𝑋) ·o 𝑌) +o 𝑍 where 0 < 𝑌 < 𝐴 and 𝑍 < (𝐴 ↑o 𝑋) (and a fortiori 𝑋 < 𝐵). Then since 𝑍 < (𝐴 ↑o 𝑋) ≤ (𝐴 ↑o 𝑋) ·o 𝑌 ≤ 𝐶, 𝑍 has a normal form, and by appending the term (𝐴 ↑o 𝑋) ·o 𝑌 using cantnfp1 9596 we get a normal form for 𝐶. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥‘𝑧) ∈ (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ ran (𝐴 CNF 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∅ ∈ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = ∪ ∩ {𝑐 ∈ On ∣ 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 ↑o 𝑐)}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (℩𝑑∃𝑎 ∈ On ∃𝑏 ∈ (𝐴 ↑o 𝑋)(𝑑 = ⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∧ (((𝐴 ↑o 𝑋) ·o 𝑎) +o 𝑏) = 𝐶))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (1st ‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (2nd ‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 CNF 𝐵)‘𝐺) = 𝑍)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑡 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if(𝑡 = 𝑋, 𝑌, (𝐺‘𝑡)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ran (𝐴 CNF 𝐵))
Theorem	cantnflem4 9607*	Lemma for cantnf 9608. Complete the induction step of cantnflem3 9606. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥‘𝑧) ∈ (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ ran (𝐴 CNF 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∅ ∈ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = ∪ ∩ {𝑐 ∈ On ∣ 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 ↑o 𝑐)}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (℩𝑑∃𝑎 ∈ On ∃𝑏 ∈ (𝐴 ↑o 𝑋)(𝑑 = ⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∧ (((𝐴 ↑o 𝑋) ·o 𝑎) +o 𝑏) = 𝐶))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (1st ‘𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (2nd ‘𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ran (𝐴 CNF 𝐵))
Theorem	cantnf 9608*	The Cantor Normal Form theorem. The function (𝐴 CNF 𝐵), which maps a finitely supported function from 𝐵 to 𝐴 to the sum ((𝐴 ↑o 𝑓(𝑎1)) ∘ 𝑎1) +o ((𝐴 ↑o 𝑓(𝑎2)) ∘ 𝑎2) +o ... over all indices 𝑎 < 𝐵 such that 𝑓(𝑎) is nonzero, is an order isomorphism from the ordering 𝑇 of finitely supported functions to the set (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵) under the natural order. Setting 𝐴 = ω and letting 𝐵 be arbitrarily large, the surjectivity of this function implies that every ordinal has a Cantor normal form (and injectivity, together with coherence cantnfres 9592, implies that such a representation is unique). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥‘𝑧) ∈ (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 CNF 𝐵) Isom 𝑇, E (𝑆, (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵)))
Theorem	oemapwe 9609*	The lexicographic order on a function space of ordinals gives a well-ordering with order type equal to the ordinal exponential. This provides an alternate definition of the ordinal exponential. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥‘𝑧) ∈ (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 We 𝑆 ∧ dom OrdIso(𝑇, 𝑆) = (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵)))
Theorem	cantnffval2 9610*	An alternate definition of df-cnf 9577 which relies on cantnf 9608. (Note that although the use of 𝑆 seems self-referential, one can use cantnfdm 9579 to eliminate it.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥‘𝑧) ∈ (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 CNF 𝐵) = ◡OrdIso(𝑇, 𝑆))
Theorem	cantnff1o 9611	Simplify the isomorphism of cantnf 9608 to simple bijection. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 CNF 𝐵):𝑆–1-1-onto→(𝐴 ↑o 𝐵))
Theorem	wemapwe 9612*	Construct lexicographic order on a function space based on a reverse well-ordering of the indices and a well-ordering of the values. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 3-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧)𝑆(𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑧𝑅𝑤 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))}    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐴) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp 𝑍}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 We 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 We 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ ∅)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = OrdIso(𝑅, 𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = OrdIso(𝑆, 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝐺‘∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 We 𝑈)
Theorem	oef1o 9613*	A bijection of the base sets induces a bijection on ordinal exponentials. (The assumption (𝐹‘∅) = ∅ can be discharged using fveqf1o 7243.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 3-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (On ∖ 1o))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘∅) = ∅)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵) ∣ 𝑥 finSupp ∅} ↦ (𝐹 ∘ (𝑦 ∘ ◡𝐺)))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (((𝐶 CNF 𝐷) ∘ 𝐾) ∘ ◡(𝐴 CNF 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:(𝐴 ↑o 𝐵)–1-1-onto→(𝐶 ↑o 𝐷))
Theorem	cnfcomlem 9614*	Lemma for cnfcom 9615. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 3-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (ω CNF 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (◡(ω CNF 𝐴)‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = OrdIso( E , (𝐹 supp ∅))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝑀 +o 𝑧)), ∅)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑓 ∈ V ↦ 𝐾), ∅)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((ω ↑o (𝐺‘𝑘)) ·o (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑘)))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 ↦ (dom 𝑓 +o 𝑥)) ∪ ◡(𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑓 ↦ (𝑀 +o 𝑥)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ dom 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ (ω ↑o (𝐺‘𝐼)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇‘𝐼):(𝐻‘𝐼)–1-1-onto→𝑂)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇‘suc 𝐼):(𝐻‘suc 𝐼)–1-1-onto→((ω ↑o (𝐺‘𝐼)) ·o (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝐼))))
Theorem	cnfcom 9615*	Any ordinal 𝐵 is equinumerous to the leading term of its Cantor normal form. Here we show that bijection explicitly. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 3-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (ω CNF 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (◡(ω CNF 𝐴)‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = OrdIso( E , (𝐹 supp ∅))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝑀 +o 𝑧)), ∅)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑓 ∈ V ↦ 𝐾), ∅)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((ω ↑o (𝐺‘𝑘)) ·o (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑘)))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 ↦ (dom 𝑓 +o 𝑥)) ∪ ◡(𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑓 ↦ (𝑀 +o 𝑥)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ dom 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇‘suc 𝐼):(𝐻‘suc 𝐼)–1-1-onto→((ω ↑o (𝐺‘𝐼)) ·o (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝐼))))
Theorem	cnfcom2lem 9616*	Lemma for cnfcom2 9617. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 3-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (ω CNF 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (◡(ω CNF 𝐴)‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = OrdIso( E , (𝐹 supp ∅))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝑀 +o 𝑧)), ∅)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑓 ∈ V ↦ 𝐾), ∅)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((ω ↑o (𝐺‘𝑘)) ·o (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑘)))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 ↦ (dom 𝑓 +o 𝑥)) ∪ ◡(𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑓 ↦ (𝑀 +o 𝑥)))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐺‘∪ dom 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∅ ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝐺 = suc ∪ dom 𝐺)
Theorem	cnfcom2 9617*	Any nonzero ordinal 𝐵 is equinumerous to the leading term of its Cantor normal form. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 3-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (ω CNF 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (◡(ω CNF 𝐴)‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = OrdIso( E , (𝐹 supp ∅))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝑀 +o 𝑧)), ∅)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑓 ∈ V ↦ 𝐾), ∅)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((ω ↑o (𝐺‘𝑘)) ·o (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑘)))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 ↦ (dom 𝑓 +o 𝑥)) ∪ ◡(𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑓 ↦ (𝑀 +o 𝑥)))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐺‘∪ dom 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∅ ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇‘dom 𝐺):𝐵–1-1-onto→((ω ↑o 𝑊) ·o (𝐹‘𝑊)))
Theorem	cnfcom3lem 9618*	Lemma for cnfcom3 9619. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 4-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (ω CNF 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (◡(ω CNF 𝐴)‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = OrdIso( E , (𝐹 supp ∅))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝑀 +o 𝑧)), ∅)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑓 ∈ V ↦ 𝐾), ∅)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((ω ↑o (𝐺‘𝑘)) ·o (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑘)))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 ↦ (dom 𝑓 +o 𝑥)) ∪ ◡(𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑓 ↦ (𝑀 +o 𝑥)))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐺‘∪ dom 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ⊆ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ (On ∖ 1o))
Theorem	cnfcom3 9619*	Any infinite ordinal 𝐵 is equinumerous to a power of ω. (We are being careful here to show explicit bijections rather than simple equinumerosity because we want a uniform construction for cnfcom3c 9621.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 4-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (ω CNF 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (◡(ω CNF 𝐴)‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = OrdIso( E , (𝐹 supp ∅))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝑀 +o 𝑧)), ∅)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑓 ∈ V ↦ 𝐾), ∅)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((ω ↑o (𝐺‘𝑘)) ·o (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑘)))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 ↦ (dom 𝑓 +o 𝑥)) ∪ ◡(𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑓 ↦ (𝑀 +o 𝑥)))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐺‘∪ dom 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ⊆ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (𝑢 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑊), 𝑣 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝑊) ↦ (((𝐹‘𝑊) ·o 𝑣) +o 𝑢))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (𝑢 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑊), 𝑣 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝑊) ↦ (((ω ↑o 𝑊) ·o 𝑢) +o 𝑣))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑋 ∘ ◡𝑌) ∘ (𝑇‘dom 𝐺))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁:𝐵–1-1-onto→(ω ↑o 𝑊))
Theorem	cnfcom3clem 9620*	Lemma for cnfcom3c 9621. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 4-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝑆 = dom (ω CNF 𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (◡(ω CNF 𝐴)‘𝑏)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = OrdIso( E , (𝐹 supp ∅))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝑀 +o 𝑧)), ∅)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = seqω((𝑘 ∈ V, 𝑓 ∈ V ↦ 𝐾), ∅)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((ω ↑o (𝐺‘𝑘)) ·o (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑘)))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 ↦ (dom 𝑓 +o 𝑥)) ∪ ◡(𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑓 ↦ (𝑀 +o 𝑥)))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐺‘∪ dom 𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (𝑢 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑊), 𝑣 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝑊) ↦ (((𝐹‘𝑊) ·o 𝑣) +o 𝑢))    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (𝑢 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑊), 𝑣 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝑊) ↦ (((ω ↑o 𝑊) ·o 𝑢) +o 𝑣))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = ((𝑋 ∘ ◡𝑌) ∘ (𝑇‘dom 𝐺))    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑏 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝐴) ↦ 𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ∃𝑔∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 (ω ⊆ 𝑏 → ∃𝑤 ∈ (On ∖ 1o)(𝑔‘𝑏):𝑏–1-1-onto→(ω ↑o 𝑤)))
Theorem	cnfcom3c 9621*	Wrap the construction of cnfcom3 9619 into an existential quantifier. For any ω ⊆ 𝑏, there is a bijection from 𝑏 to some power of ω. Furthermore, this bijection is canonical , which means that we can find a single function 𝑔 which will give such bijections for every 𝑏 less than some arbitrarily large bound 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ∃𝑔∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 (ω ⊆ 𝑏 → ∃𝑤 ∈ (On ∖ 1o)(𝑔‘𝑏):𝑏–1-1-onto→(ω ↑o 𝑤)))
2.6.4  Transitive closure of a relation
Syntax	cttrcl 9622	Declare the syntax for the transitive closure of a class.
class t++𝑅
Definition	df-ttrcl 9623*	Define the transitive closure of a class. This is the smallest relation containing 𝑅 (or more precisely, the relation (𝑅 ↾ V) induced by 𝑅) and having the transitive property. Definition from [Levy] p. 59, who denotes it as 𝑅∗ and calls it the "ancestral" of 𝑅. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Oct-2024.)
⊢ t++𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ 1o)∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn suc 𝑛 ∧ ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝑥 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑛) = 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑚 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑓‘𝑚)𝑅(𝑓‘suc 𝑚))}
Theorem	ttrcleq 9624	Equality theorem for transitive closure. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → t++𝑅 = t++𝑆)
Theorem	nfttrcld 9625	Bound variable hypothesis builder for transitive closure. Deduction form. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥t++𝑅)
Theorem	nfttrcl 9626	Bound variable hypothesis builder for transitive closure. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Oct-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥t++𝑅
Theorem	relttrcl 9627	The transitive closure of a class is a relation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Oct-2024.)
⊢ Rel t++𝑅
Theorem	brttrcl 9628*	Characterization of elements of the transitive closure of a relation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴t++𝑅𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑛 ∈ (ω ∖ 1o)∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn suc 𝑛 ∧ ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑛) = 𝐵) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑓‘𝑎)𝑅(𝑓‘suc 𝑎)))
Theorem	brttrcl2 9629*	Characterization of elements of the transitive closure of a relation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴t++𝑅𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑛 ∈ ω ∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn suc suc 𝑛 ∧ ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑓‘suc 𝑛) = 𝐵) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ suc 𝑛(𝑓‘𝑎)𝑅(𝑓‘suc 𝑎)))
Theorem	ssttrcl 9630	If 𝑅 is a relation, then it is a subclass of its transitive closure. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → 𝑅 ⊆ t++𝑅)
Theorem	ttrcltr 9631	The transitive closure of a class is transitive. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (t++𝑅 ∘ t++𝑅) ⊆ t++𝑅
Theorem	ttrclresv 9632	The transitive closure of 𝑅 restricted to V is the same as the transitive closure of 𝑅 itself. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Oct-2024.)
⊢ t++(𝑅 ↾ V) = t++𝑅
Theorem	ttrclco 9633	Composition law for the transitive closure of a relation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (t++𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ t++𝑅
Theorem	cottrcl 9634	Composition law for the transitive closure of a relation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∘ t++𝑅) ⊆ t++𝑅
Theorem	ttrclss 9635	If 𝑅 is a subclass of 𝑆 and 𝑆 is transitive, then the transitive closure of 𝑅 is a subclass of 𝑆. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Oct-2024.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ⊆ 𝑆 ∧ (𝑆 ∘ 𝑆) ⊆ 𝑆) → t++𝑅 ⊆ 𝑆)
Theorem	dmttrcl 9636	The domain of a transitive closure is the same as the domain of the original class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Oct-2024.)
⊢ dom t++𝑅 = dom 𝑅
Theorem	rnttrcl 9637	The range of a transitive closure is the same as the range of the original class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Oct-2024.)
⊢ ran t++𝑅 = ran 𝑅
Theorem	ttrclexg 9638	If 𝑅 is a set, then so is t++𝑅. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → t++𝑅 ∈ V)
Theorem	dfttrcl2 9639*	When 𝑅 is a set and a relation, then its transitive closure can be defined by an intersection. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Oct-2024.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Rel 𝑅) → t++𝑅 = ∩ {𝑧 ∣ (𝑅 ⊆ 𝑧 ∧ (𝑧 ∘ 𝑧) ⊆ 𝑧)})
Theorem	ttrclselem1 9640*	Lemma for ttrclse 9642. Show that all finite ordinal function values of 𝐹 are subsets of 𝐴. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 31-Oct-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = rec((𝑏 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑏 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤)), Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ω → (𝐹‘𝑁) ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	ttrclselem2 9641*	Lemma for ttrclse 9642. Show that a suc 𝑁 element long chain gives membership in the 𝑁-th predecessor class and vice-versa. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 31-Oct-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = rec((𝑏 ∈ V ↦ ∪ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑏 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤)), Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn suc suc 𝑁 ∧ ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝑦 ∧ (𝑓‘suc 𝑁) = 𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ suc 𝑁(𝑓‘𝑎)(𝑅 ↾ 𝐴)(𝑓‘suc 𝑎)) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑁)))
Theorem	ttrclse 9642	If 𝑅 is set-like over 𝐴, then the transitive closure of the restriction of 𝑅 to 𝐴 is set-like over 𝐴. This theorem requires the axioms of infinity and replacement for its proof. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 31-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝑅 Se 𝐴 → t++(𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) Se 𝐴)
2.6.5  Transitive closure
Theorem	trcl 9643*	For any set 𝐴, show the properties of its transitive closure 𝐶. Similar to Theorem 9.1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 73 except that we show an explicit expression for the transitive closure rather than just its existence. See tz9.1 9644 for an abbreviated version showing existence. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (rec((𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝑧 ∪ ∪ 𝑧)), 𝐴) ↾ ω)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ ω (𝐹‘𝑦)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ Tr 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑥((𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ Tr 𝑥) → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝑥))
Theorem	tz9.1 9644*	Every set has a transitive closure (the smallest transitive extension). Theorem 9.1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 73. See trcl 9643 for an explicit expression for the transitive closure. Apparently open problems are whether this theorem can be proved without the Axiom of Infinity; if not, then whether it implies Infinity; and if not, what is the "property" that Infinity has that the other axioms don't have that is weaker than Infinity itself? (Added 22-Mar-2011) The following article seems to answer the first question, that it can't be proved without Infinity, in the affirmative: Mancini, Antonella and Zambella, Domenico (2001). "A note on recursive models of set theories." Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 42(2):109-115. (Thanks to Scott Fenton.) (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2003.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ∃𝑥(𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ Tr 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦((𝐴 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ Tr 𝑦) → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦))
Theorem	tz9.1c 9645*	Alternate expression for the existence of transitive closures tz9.1 9644: the intersection of all transitive sets containing 𝐴 is a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ Tr 𝑥)} ∈ V
Theorem	epfrs 9646*	The strong form of the Axiom of Regularity (no sethood requirement on 𝐴), with the axiom itself present as an antecedent. See also zfregs 9647. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Mar-2013.)
⊢ (( E Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∩ 𝐴) = ∅)
Theorem	zfregs 9647*	The strong form of the Axiom of Regularity, which does not require that 𝐴 be a set. Axiom 6' of [TakeutiZaring] p. 21. See also epfrs 9646. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∩ 𝐴) = ∅)
Theorem	zfregs2 9648*	Alternate strong form of the Axiom of Regularity. Not every element of a nonempty class contains some element of that class. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Oct-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 27-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))
Theorem	setind 9649*	Set (epsilon) induction. Theorem 5.22 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 21. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2003.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐴 = V)
Theorem	setind2 9650	Set (epsilon) induction, stated compactly. Given as a homework problem in 1992 by George Boolos (1940-1996). (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2003.)
⊢ (𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐴 → 𝐴 = V)
Syntax	ctc 9651	Extend class notation to include the transitive closure function.
class TC
Definition	df-tc 9652*	The transitive closure function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2013.)
⊢ TC = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ ∩ {𝑦 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ Tr 𝑦)})
Theorem	tcvalg 9653*	Value of the transitive closure function. (The fact that this intersection exists is a non-trivial fact that depends on ax-inf 9553; see tz9.1 9644.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (TC‘𝐴) = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ Tr 𝑥)})
Theorem	tcid 9654	Defining property of the transitive closure function: it contains its argument as a subset. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ⊆ (TC‘𝐴))
Theorem	tctr 9655	Defining property of the transitive closure function: it is transitive. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2013.)
⊢ Tr (TC‘𝐴)
Theorem	tcmin 9656	Defining property of the transitive closure function: it is a subset of any transitive class containing 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ Tr 𝐵) → (TC‘𝐴) ⊆ 𝐵))
Theorem	tc2 9657*	A variant of the definition of the transitive closure function, using instead the smallest transitive set containing 𝐴 as a member, gives almost the same set, except that 𝐴 itself must be added because it is not usually a member of (TC‘𝐴) (and it is never a member if 𝐴 is well-founded). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((TC‘𝐴) ∪ {𝐴}) = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ Tr 𝑥)}
Theorem	tcsni 9658	The transitive closure of a singleton. Proof suggested by Gérard Lang. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (TC‘{𝐴}) = ((TC‘𝐴) ∪ {𝐴})
Theorem	tcss 9659	The transitive closure function inherits the subset relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 → (TC‘𝐵) ⊆ (TC‘𝐴))
Theorem	tcel 9660	The transitive closure function converts the element relation to the subset relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → (TC‘𝐵) ⊆ (TC‘𝐴))
Theorem	tcidm 9661	The transitive closure function is idempotent. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (TC‘(TC‘𝐴)) = (TC‘𝐴)
Theorem	tc0 9662	The transitive closure of the empty set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (TC‘∅) = ∅
Theorem	tc00 9663	The transitive closure is empty iff its argument is. Proof suggested by Gérard Lang. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ((TC‘𝐴) = ∅ ↔ 𝐴 = ∅))
2.6.6  Well-Founded Induction
Theorem	frmin 9664*	Every (possibly proper) subclass of a class 𝐴 with a well-founded set-like relation 𝑅 has a minimal element. This is a very strong generalization of tz6.26 6299 and tz7.5 6332. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Feb-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 27-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅)) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 Pred(𝑅, 𝐵, 𝑦) = ∅)
Theorem	frind 9665*	A subclass of a well-founded class 𝐴 with the property that whenever it contains all predecessors of an element of 𝐴 it also contains that element, is equal to 𝐴. Compare wfi 6301 and tfi 7793, which are special cases of this theorem that do not require the axiom of infinity. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Feb-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦) ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵))) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	frinsg 9666*	Well-Founded Induction Schema. If a property passes from all elements less than 𝑦 of a well-founded class 𝐴 to 𝑦 itself (induction hypothesis), then the property holds for all elements of 𝐴. Theorem 5.6(ii) of [Levy] p. 64. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Feb-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → (∀𝑧 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦)[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑 → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	frins 9667*	Well-Founded Induction Schema. If a property passes from all elements less than 𝑦 of a well-founded class 𝐴 to 𝑦 itself (induction hypothesis), then the property holds for all elements of 𝐴. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Feb-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝑅 Fr 𝐴    &   ⊢ 𝑅 Se 𝐴    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → (∀𝑧 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦)[𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑 → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑)
Theorem	frins2f 9668*	Well-Founded Induction schema, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Feb-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → (∀𝑧 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦)𝜓 → 𝜑))    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	frins2 9669*	Well-Founded Induction schema, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Feb-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → (∀𝑧 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦)𝜓 → 𝜑))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	frins3 9670*	Well-Founded Induction schema, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Feb-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → (∀𝑧 ∈ Pred (𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦)𝜓 → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜒)
2.6.7  Well-Founded Recursion
Theorem	frr3g 9671*	Functions defined by well-founded recursion are identical up to relation, domain, and characteristic function. General version of frr3 9676. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 10-Feb-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) = (𝑦𝐻(𝐹 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦)))) ∧ (𝐺 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐺‘𝑦) = (𝑦𝐻(𝐺 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦))))) → 𝐹 = 𝐺)
Theorem	frrlem15 9672*	Lemma for general well-founded recursion. Two acceptable functions are compatible. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Sep-2023.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦) ⊆ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝑦𝐺(𝑓 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦))))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = frecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (𝑔 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑥𝑔𝑢 ∧ 𝑥ℎ𝑣) → 𝑢 = 𝑣))
Theorem	frrlem16 9673*	Lemma for general well-founded recursion. Establish a subset relation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Sep-2023.) Revised notion of transitive closure. (Revised by Scott Fenton, 1-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → ∀𝑤 ∈ Pred (t++(𝑅 ↾ 𝐴), 𝐴, 𝑧)Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤) ⊆ Pred(t++(𝑅 ↾ 𝐴), 𝐴, 𝑧))
Theorem	frr1 9674	Law of general well-founded recursion, part one. This theorem and the following two drop the partial order requirement from fpr1 8243, fpr2 8244, and fpr3 8245, which requires using the axiom of infinity (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Sep-2023.)
⊢ 𝐹 = frecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)
Theorem	frr2 9675	Law of general well-founded recursion, part two. Now we establish the value of 𝐹 within 𝐴. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Sep-2023.)
⊢ 𝐹 = frecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = (𝑋𝐺(𝐹 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋))))
Theorem	frr3 9676*	Law of general well-founded recursion, part three. Finally, we show that 𝐹 is unique. We do this by showing that any function 𝐻 with the same properties we proved of 𝐹 in frr1 9674 and frr2 9675 is identical to 𝐹. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Sep-2023.)
⊢ 𝐹 = frecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (𝐻 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘𝑧) = (𝑧𝐺(𝐻 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑧))))) → 𝐹 = 𝐻)
2.6.8  Rank
Syntax	cr1 9677	Extend class definition to include the cumulative hierarchy of sets function.
class 𝑅1
Syntax	crnk 9678	Extend class definition to include rank function.
class rank
Definition	df-r1 9679	Define the cumulative hierarchy of sets function, using Takeuti and Zaring's notation (𝑅1). Starting with the empty set, this function builds up layers of sets where the next layer is the power set of the previous layer (and the union of previous layers when the argument is a limit ordinal). Using the Axiom of Regularity, we can show that any set whatsoever belongs to one of the layers of this hierarchy (see tz9.13 9706). Our definition expresses Definition 9.9 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 76 in a closed form, from which we derive the recursive definition as Theorems r10 9683, r1suc 9685, and r1lim 9687. Theorem r1val1 9701 shows a recursive definition that works for all values, and Theorems r1val2 9752 and r1val3 9753 show the value expressed in terms of rank. Other notations for this function are R with the argument as a subscript (Equation 3.1 of [BellMachover] p. 477), V with a subscript (Definition of [Enderton] p. 202), M with a subscript (Definition 15.19 of [Monk1] p. 113), the capital Greek letter psi (Definition of [Mendelson] p. 281), and bold-face R (Definition 2.1 of [Kunen] p. 95). (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-2003.)
⊢ 𝑅1 = rec((𝑥 ∈ V ↦ 𝒫 𝑥), ∅)
Definition	df-rank 9680*	Define the rank function. See rankval 9731, rankval2 9733, rankval3 9755, or rankval4 9782 its value. The rank is a kind of "inverse" of the cumulative hierarchy of sets function 𝑅1: given a set, it returns an ordinal number telling us the smallest layer of the hierarchy to which the set belongs. Based on Definition 9.14 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 79. Theorem rankid 9748 illustrates the "inverse" concept. Another nice theorem showing the relationship is rankr1a 9751. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2003.)
⊢ rank = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ ∩ {𝑦 ∈ On ∣ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑅1‘suc 𝑦)})
Theorem	r1funlim 9681	The cumulative hierarchy of sets function is a function on a limit ordinal. (This weak form of r1fnon 9682 avoids ax-rep 5221.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (Fun 𝑅1 ∧ Lim dom 𝑅1)
Theorem	r1fnon 9682	The cumulative hierarchy of sets function is a function on the class of ordinal numbers. (Contributed by NM, 5-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2013.)
⊢ 𝑅1 Fn On
Theorem	r10 9683	Value of the cumulative hierarchy of sets function at ∅. Part of Definition 9.9 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 76. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (𝑅1‘∅) = ∅
Theorem	r1sucg 9684	Value of the cumulative hierarchy of sets function at a successor ordinal. Part of Definition 9.9 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 76. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅1 → (𝑅1‘suc 𝐴) = 𝒫 (𝑅1‘𝐴))
Theorem	r1suc 9685	Value of the cumulative hierarchy of sets function at a successor ordinal. Part of Definition 9.9 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 76. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝑅1‘suc 𝐴) = 𝒫 (𝑅1‘𝐴))
Theorem	r1limg 9686*	Value of the cumulative hierarchy of sets function at a limit ordinal. Part of Definition 9.9 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 76. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅1 ∧ Lim 𝐴) → (𝑅1‘𝐴) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑅1‘𝑥))
Theorem	r1lim 9687*	Value of the cumulative hierarchy of sets function at a limit ordinal. Part of Definition 9.9 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 76. (Contributed by NM, 4-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ Lim 𝐴) → (𝑅1‘𝐴) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑅1‘𝑥))
Theorem	r1fin 9688	The first ω levels of the cumulative hierarchy are all finite. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (𝑅1‘𝐴) ∈ Fin)
Theorem	r1sdom 9689	Each stage in the cumulative hierarchy is strictly larger than the last. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑅1‘𝐵) ≺ (𝑅1‘𝐴))
Theorem	r111 9690	The cumulative hierarchy is a one-to-one function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝑅1:On–1-1→V
Theorem	r1tr 9691	The cumulative hierarchy of sets is transitive. Lemma 7T of [Enderton] p. 202. (Contributed by NM, 8-Sep-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ Tr (𝑅1‘𝐴)
Theorem	r1tr2 9692	The union of a cumulative hierarchy of sets at ordinal 𝐴 is a subset of the hierarchy at 𝐴. JFM CLASSES1 th. 40. (Contributed by FL, 20-Apr-2011.)
⊢ ∪ (𝑅1‘𝐴) ⊆ (𝑅1‘𝐴)
Theorem	r1ordg 9693	Ordering relation for the cumulative hierarchy of sets. Part of Proposition 9.10(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 77. (Contributed by NM, 8-Sep-2003.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝑅1‘𝐴) ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵)))
Theorem	r1ord3g 9694	Ordering relation for the cumulative hierarchy of sets. Part of Theorem 3.3(i) of [BellMachover] p. 478. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2003.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅1 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝑅1‘𝐴) ⊆ (𝑅1‘𝐵)))
Theorem	r1ord 9695	Ordering relation for the cumulative hierarchy of sets. Part of Proposition 9.10(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 77. (Contributed by NM, 8-Sep-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ On → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝑅1‘𝐴) ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵)))
Theorem	r1ord2 9696	Ordering relation for the cumulative hierarchy of sets. Part of Proposition 9.10(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 77. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2003.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ On → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝑅1‘𝐴) ⊆ (𝑅1‘𝐵)))
Theorem	r1ord3 9697	Ordering relation for the cumulative hierarchy of sets. Part of Theorem 3.3(i) of [BellMachover] p. 478. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2003.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝑅1‘𝐴) ⊆ (𝑅1‘𝐵)))
Theorem	r1sssuc 9698	The value of the cumulative hierarchy of sets function is a subset of its value at the successor. JFM CLASSES1 Th. 39. (Contributed by FL, 20-Apr-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝑅1‘𝐴) ⊆ (𝑅1‘suc 𝐴))
Theorem	r1pwss 9699	Each set of the cumulative hierarchy is closed under subsets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ (𝑅1‘𝐵))
Theorem	r1sscl 9700	Each set of the cumulative hierarchy is closed under subsets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵))