Theorem rabss2 3078

Description: Subclass law for restricted abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 18-Dec-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rabss2	⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑})

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜑(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem rabss2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		pm3.45 562	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)))
2	1	alimi 1385	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → ∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)))
3		dfss2 2989	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
4		ss2ab 3063	. . 3 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)} ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)))
5	2, 3, 4	3imtr4i 199	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)})
6		df-rab 2358	. 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)}
7		df-rab 2358	. 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)}
8	5, 6, 7	3sstr4g 3041	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 102  ∀wal 1283   ∈ wcel 1434  {cab 2068  {crab 2353   ⊆ wss 2974

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 663  ax-5 1377  ax-7 1378  ax-gen 1379  ax-ie1 1423  ax-ie2 1424  ax-8 1436  ax-10 1437  ax-11 1438  ax-i12 1439  ax-bndl 1440  ax-4 1441  ax-17 1460  ax-i9 1464  ax-ial 1468  ax-i5r 1469  ax-ext 2064

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-nf 1391  df-sb 1687  df-clab 2069  df-cleq 2075  df-clel 2078  df-nfc 2209  df-rab 2358  df-in 2980  df-ss 2987

This theorem is referenced by:  sess2  4101