Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next > Nearby theorems Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  ssoprab2 Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem ssoprab2 6696
 Description: Equivalence of ordered pair abstraction subclass and implication. Compare ssopab2 4991. (Contributed by FL, 6-Nov-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
ssoprab2 (∀𝑥𝑦𝑧(𝜑𝜓) → {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓})

Proof of Theorem ssoprab2
Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 id 22 . . . . . . 7 ((𝜑𝜓) → (𝜑𝜓))
21anim2d 588 . . . . . 6 ((𝜑𝜓) → ((𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
32aleximi 1757 . . . . 5 (∀𝑧(𝜑𝜓) → (∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → ∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
43aleximi 1757 . . . 4 (∀𝑦𝑧(𝜑𝜓) → (∃𝑦𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → ∃𝑦𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
54aleximi 1757 . . 3 (∀𝑥𝑦𝑧(𝜑𝜓) → (∃𝑥𝑦𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → ∃𝑥𝑦𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
65ss2abdv 3667 . 2 (∀𝑥𝑦𝑧(𝜑𝜓) → {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑦𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑦𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)})
7 df-oprab 6639 . 2 {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑦𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
8 df-oprab 6639 . 2 {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑦𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)}
96, 7, 83sstr4g 3638 1 (∀𝑥𝑦𝑧(𝜑𝜓) → {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓})
 Colors of variables: wff setvar class Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 384  ∀wal 1479   = wceq 1481  ∃wex 1702  {cab 2606   ⊆ wss 3567  ⟨cop 4174  {coprab 6636 This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1720  ax-4 1735  ax-5 1837  ax-6 1886  ax-7 1933  ax-9 1997  ax-10 2017  ax-11 2032  ax-12 2045  ax-13 2244  ax-ext 2600 This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-tru 1484  df-ex 1703  df-nf 1708  df-sb 1879  df-clab 2607  df-cleq 2613  df-clel 2616  df-nfc 2751  df-in 3574  df-ss 3581  df-oprab 6639 This theorem is referenced by:  ssoprab2b  6697  joinfval  16982  meetfval  16996
 Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator