Theorem con1bidc 875

Description: Contraposition. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Apr-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
con1bidc	|- (DECID ph -> (DECID ps -> ( ( -. ph <-> ps ) <-> ( -. ps <-> ph ) ) ) )

Proof of Theorem con1bidc

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		con1biimdc 874	. . . 4 |- (DECID ph -> ( ( -. ph <-> ps ) -> ( -. ps <-> ph ) ) )
2	1	adantr 276	. . 3 |- ( (DECID ph /\ DECID ps ) -> ( ( -. ph <-> ps ) -> ( -. ps <-> ph ) ) )
3		con1biimdc 874	. . . 4 |- (DECID ps -> ( ( -. ps <-> ph ) -> ( -. ph <-> ps ) ) )
4	3	adantl 277	. . 3 |- ( (DECID ph /\ DECID ps ) -> ( ( -. ps <-> ph ) -> ( -. ph <-> ps ) ) )
5	2, 4	impbid 129	. 2 |- ( (DECID ph /\ DECID ps ) -> ( ( -. ph <-> ps ) <-> ( -. ps <-> ph ) ) )
6	5	ex 115	1 |- (DECID ph -> (DECID ps -> ( ( -. ph <-> ps ) <-> ( -. ps <-> ph ) ) ) )

Syntax hints:   -. wn 3   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   <-> wb 105  DECID wdc 835

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 615  ax-in2 616  ax-io 710

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-stab 832  df-dc 836

This theorem is referenced by:  con2bidc  876