Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > stoic2b | GIF version |
Description: Stoic logic Thema 2
version b. See stoic2a 1417.
Version b is with the phrase "or both". We already have this rule as mpd3an3 1328, so here we prove the equivalence and discourage its use. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 17-Feb-2019.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
stoic2b.1 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) |
stoic2b.2 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
stoic2b | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | stoic2b.1 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) | |
2 | stoic2b.2 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) | |
3 | 1, 2 | mpd3an3 1328 | 1 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 103 ∧ w3a 968 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 105 ax-ia2 106 ax-ia3 107 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 116 df-3an 970 |
This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |