Theorem stoic2b 1418

Description: Stoic logic Thema 2 version b. See stoic2a 1417.

Version b is with the phrase "or both". We already have this rule as mpd3an3 1328, so here we prove the equivalence and discourage its use. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 17-Feb-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
stoic2b.1	|- ( ( ph /\ ps ) -> ch )
stoic2b.2	|- ( ( ph /\ ps /\ ch ) -> th )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
stoic2b	|- ( ( ph /\ ps ) -> th )

Proof of Theorem stoic2b

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		stoic2b.1	. 2 |- ( ( ph /\ ps ) -> ch )
2		stoic2b.2	. 2 |- ( ( ph /\ ps /\ ch ) -> th )
3	1, 2	mpd3an3 1328	1 |- ( ( ph /\ ps ) -> th )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 103   /\ w3a 968

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 970

This theorem is referenced by: (None)