Theorem stoic2b 1406

Description: Stoic logic Thema 2 version b. See stoic2a 1405.

Version b is with the phrase "or both". We already have this rule as mpd3an3 1316, so here we prove the equivalence and discourage its use. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 17-Feb-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
stoic2b.1	|- ( ( ph /\ ps ) -> ch )
stoic2b.2	|- ( ( ph /\ ps /\ ch ) -> th )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
stoic2b	|- ( ( ph /\ ps ) -> th )

Proof of Theorem stoic2b

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		stoic2b.1	. 2 |- ( ( ph /\ ps ) -> ch )
2		stoic2b.2	. 2 |- ( ( ph /\ ps /\ ch ) -> th )
3	1, 2	mpd3an3 1316	1 |- ( ( ph /\ ps ) -> th )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 103   /\ w3a 962

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 964

This theorem is referenced by: (None)