Theorem cbvab 2472

Description: Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
cbvab.1	|- F/yph
cbvab.2	|- F/xps
cbvab.3	|- (x = y -> (ph <-> ps))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cbvab	|- {x | ph} = {y | ps}

Proof of Theorem cbvab

Dummy variable z is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		cbvab.2	. . . . 5 |- F/xps
2	1	nfsb 2109	. . . 4 |- F/x[z / y]ps
3		cbvab.1	. . . . . 6 |- F/yph
4		cbvab.3	. . . . . . . 8 |- (x = y -> (ph <-> ps))
5	4	equcoms 1681	. . . . . . 7 |- (y = x -> (ph <-> ps))
6	5	bicomd 192	. . . . . 6 |- (y = x -> (ps <-> ph))
7	3, 6	sbie 2038	. . . . 5 |- ([x / y]ps <-> ph)
8		sbequ 2060	. . . . 5 |- (x = z -> ([x / y]ps <-> [z / y]ps))
9	7, 8	syl5bbr 250	. . . 4 |- (x = z -> (ph <-> [z / y]ps))
10	2, 9	sbie 2038	. . 3 |- ([z / x]ph <-> [z / y]ps)
11		df-clab 2340	. . 3 |- (z e. {x | ph} <-> [z / x]ph)
12		df-clab 2340	. . 3 |- (z e. {y | ps} <-> [z / y]ps)
13	10, 11, 12	3bitr4i 268	. 2 |- (z e. {x | ph} <-> z e. {y | ps})
14	13	eqriv 2350	1 |- {x | ph} = {y | ps}

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   <-> wb 176   F/wnf 1544   = wceq 1642  [wsb 1648   e. wcel 1710  {cab 2339

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1546  ax-5 1557  ax-17 1616  ax-9 1654  ax-8 1675  ax-6 1729  ax-7 1734  ax-11 1746  ax-12 1925  ax-ext 2334

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 177  df-or 359  df-an 360  df-tru 1319  df-ex 1542  df-nf 1545  df-sb 1649  df-clab 2340  df-cleq 2346

This theorem is referenced by:  cbvabv  2473  cbvrab  2858  cbvsbc  3075  cbvrabcsf  3202  dfdmf  4906  dfrnf  4963  funfv2f  5378