Theorem u2lemnona 666

Description: Lemma for Dishkant implication study. (Contributed by NM, 16-Dec-1997.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
u2lemnona	((a →2 b)⊥ ∪ a⊥ ) = (a⊥ ∪ b⊥ )

Proof of Theorem u2lemnona

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		u2lemaa 601	. . 3 ((a →2 b) ∩ a) = (a ∩ b)
2		df-a 40	. . 3 ((a →2 b) ∩ a) = ((a →2 b)⊥ ∪ a⊥ )⊥
3		df-a 40	. . 3 (a ∩ b) = (a⊥ ∪ b⊥ )⊥
4	1, 2, 3	3tr2 64	. 2 ((a →2 b)⊥ ∪ a⊥ )⊥ = (a⊥ ∪ b⊥ )⊥
5	4	con1 66	1 ((a →2 b)⊥ ∪ a⊥ ) = (a⊥ ∪ b⊥ )

Syntax hints:   = wb 1  ^⊥ wn 4   ∪ wo 6   ∩ wa 7   →₂ wi2 13

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-a1 30  ax-a2 31  ax-a3 32  ax-a4 33  ax-a5 34  ax-r1 35  ax-r2 36  ax-r4 37  ax-r5 38  ax-r3 439

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-b 39  df-a 40  df-t 41  df-f 42  df-i2 45  df-le1 130  df-le2 131  df-c1 132  df-c2 133

This theorem is referenced by: (None)