Theorem funcoeqres 5398

Description: Express a constraint on a composition as a constraint on the composand. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 7-Mar-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
funcoeqres	⊢ ((Fun 𝐺 ∧ (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) = 𝐻) → (𝐹 ↾ ran 𝐺) = (𝐻 ∘ ◡𝐺))

Proof of Theorem funcoeqres

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		funcocnv2 5392	. . . 4 ⊢ (Fun 𝐺 → (𝐺 ∘ ◡𝐺) = ( I ↾ ran 𝐺))
2	1	coeq2d 4701	. . 3 ⊢ (Fun 𝐺 → (𝐹 ∘ (𝐺 ∘ ◡𝐺)) = (𝐹 ∘ ( I ↾ ran 𝐺)))
3		coass 5057	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ∘ ◡𝐺) = (𝐹 ∘ (𝐺 ∘ ◡𝐺))
4	3	eqcomi 2143	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹 ∘ (𝐺 ∘ ◡𝐺)) = ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ∘ ◡𝐺)
5		coires1 5056	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹 ∘ ( I ↾ ran 𝐺)) = (𝐹 ↾ ran 𝐺)
6	2, 4, 5	3eqtr3g 2195	. 2 ⊢ (Fun 𝐺 → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ∘ ◡𝐺) = (𝐹 ↾ ran 𝐺))
7		coeq1 4696	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) = 𝐻 → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ∘ ◡𝐺) = (𝐻 ∘ ◡𝐺))
8	6, 7	sylan9req 2193	1 ⊢ ((Fun 𝐺 ∧ (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) = 𝐻) → (𝐹 ↾ ran 𝐺) = (𝐻 ∘ ◡𝐺))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 103   = wceq 1331   I cid 4210  ^◡ccnv 4538  ran crn 4540   ↾ cres 4541   ∘ ccom 4543  Fun wfun 5117

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 698  ax-5 1423  ax-7 1424  ax-gen 1425  ax-ie1 1469  ax-ie2 1470  ax-8 1482  ax-10 1483  ax-11 1484  ax-i12 1485  ax-bndl 1486  ax-4 1487  ax-14 1492  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514  ax-i5r 1515  ax-ext 2121  ax-sep 4046  ax-pow 4098  ax-pr 4131

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 964  df-tru 1334  df-nf 1437  df-sb 1736  df-eu 2002  df-mo 2003  df-clab 2126  df-cleq 2132  df-clel 2135  df-nfc 2270  df-ral 2421  df-rex 2422  df-v 2688  df-un 3075  df-in 3077  df-ss 3084  df-pw 3512  df-sn 3533  df-pr 3534  df-op 3536  df-br 3930  df-opab 3990  df-id 4215  df-xp 4545  df-rel 4546  df-cnv 4547  df-co 4548  df-dm 4549  df-rn 4550  df-res 4551  df-fun 5125

This theorem is referenced by: (None)