Theorem bj-opelidb 34447

Description: Characterization of the ordered pair elements of the identity relation.

Remark: in deduction-style proofs, one could save a few syntactic steps by using another antecedent than ⊤ which already appears in the proof. Here for instance this could be the definition I = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝑥 = 𝑦} but this would make the proof less easy to read. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Dec-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-opelidb	⊢ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ I ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem bj-opelidb

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-id 5460	. . . 4 ⊢ I = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝑥 = 𝑦}
2	1	a1i 11	. . 3 ⊢ (⊤ → I = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝑥 = 𝑦})
3		eqeq12 2835	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → (𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
4	3	adantl 484	. . 3 ⊢ ((⊤ ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) → (𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
5	2, 4	opelopabbv 34438	. 2 ⊢ (⊤ → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ I ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵)))
6	5	mptru 1544	1 ⊢ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ I ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 398   = wceq 1537  ⊤wtru 1538   ∈ wcel 2114  Vcvv 3494  ⟨cop 4573  {copab 5128   I cid 5459

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2145  ax-11 2161  ax-12 2177  ax-ext 2793  ax-sep 5203  ax-nul 5210  ax-pr 5330

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3an 1085  df-tru 1540  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2070  df-mo 2622  df-eu 2654  df-clab 2800  df-cleq 2814  df-clel 2893  df-nfc 2963  df-rab 3147  df-v 3496  df-dif 3939  df-un 3941  df-in 3943  df-ss 3952  df-nul 4292  df-if 4468  df-sn 4568  df-pr 4570  df-op 4574  df-opab 5129  df-id 5460

This theorem is referenced by:  bj-opelidb1  34448  bj-opelid  34451