Theorem bnj917 32206

Description: Technical lemma for bnj69 32282. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj917.1	⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅))
bnj917.2	⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
bnj917.3	⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})
bnj917.4	⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)}
bnj917.5	⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj917	⊢ (𝑦 ∈ trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) → ∃𝑓∃𝑛∃𝑖(𝜒 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑓,𝑖,𝑛,𝑦   𝐷,𝑖   𝑅,𝑓,𝑖,𝑛,𝑦   𝑓,𝑋,𝑖,𝑛,𝑦   𝜑,𝑖

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑦,𝑓,𝑛)   𝜓(𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑛)   𝜒(𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑛)   𝐵(𝑦,𝑓,𝑖,𝑛)   𝐷(𝑦,𝑓,𝑛)

Proof of Theorem bnj917

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj917.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅))
2		bnj917.2	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
3		bnj917.3	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})
4		bnj917.4	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)}
5		biid 263	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
6	1, 2, 3, 4, 5	bnj916 32205	. 2 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) → ∃𝑓∃𝑛∃𝑖(𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖)))
7		bnj917.5	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
8		bnj252 31973	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))
9	7, 8	bitri 277	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))
10	9	3anbi1i 1153	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖)) ↔ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖)))
11		bnj253 31974	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖)) ↔ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖)))
12	10, 11	bitr4i 280	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖)) ↔ (𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖)))
13	12	3exbii 1850	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑓∃𝑛∃𝑖(𝜒 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖)) ↔ ∃𝑓∃𝑛∃𝑖(𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖)))
14	6, 13	sylibr 236	1 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ trCl(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) → ∃𝑓∃𝑛∃𝑖(𝜒 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 398   ∧ w3a 1083   = wceq 1537  ∃wex 1780   ∈ wcel 2114  {cab 2799  ∀wral 3138  ∃wrex 3139   ∖ cdif 3933  ∅c0 4291  {csn 4567  ∪ ciun 4919  suc csuc 6193   Fn wfn 6350  ‘cfv 6355  ωcom 7580   ∧ w-bnj17 31956   predc-bnj14 31958   trClc-bnj18 31964

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2145  ax-11 2161  ax-12 2177  ax-ext 2793

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3an 1085  df-tru 1540  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2070  df-clab 2800  df-cleq 2814  df-clel 2893  df-nfc 2963  df-ral 3143  df-rex 3144  df-v 3496  df-iun 4921  df-fn 6358  df-bnj17 31957  df-bnj18 31965

This theorem is referenced by:  bnj981  32222  bnj996  32228