Theorem dmrab 30256

Description: Domain of a restricted class abstraction over a cartesian product. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Jul-2023.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
dmrab.1	⊢ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dmrab	⊢ dom {𝑧 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓}

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦,𝑧   𝜑,𝑥,𝑦   𝜓,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑧)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem dmrab

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dmrab.1	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
2	1	elrab 3676	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∣ 𝜑} ↔ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝜓))
3		opelxp 5584	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵))
4	3	anbi1i 625	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜓))
5		ancom 463	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
6	5	anbi1i 625	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝜓))
7	2, 4, 6	3bitri 299	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝜓))
8		anass 471	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)))
9		ancom 463	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
10	9	anbi2i 624	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
11	7, 8, 10	3bitri 299	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∣ 𝜑} ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
12	11	exbii 1847	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑦⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
13		df-rex 3143	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
14		r19.41v 3346	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ↔ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
15	12, 13, 14	3bitr2i 301	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑦⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∣ 𝜑} ↔ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
16	15	biancomi 465	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑦⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∣ 𝜑} ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))
17	16	abbii 2885	. 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∣ 𝜑}} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)}
18		dfdm3 5751	. 2 ⊢ dom {𝑧 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∣ 𝜑}}
19		df-rab 3146	. 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)}
20	17, 18, 19	3eqtr4i 2853	1 ⊢ dom {𝑧 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓}

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 398   = wceq 1536  ∃wex 1779   ∈ wcel 2113  {cab 2798  ∃wrex 3138  {crab 3141  ⟨cop 4566   × cxp 5546  dom cdm 5548

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2014  ax-8 2115  ax-9 2123  ax-10 2144  ax-11 2160  ax-12 2176  ax-ext 2792  ax-sep 5196  ax-nul 5203  ax-pr 5323

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3an 1084  df-tru 1539  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2069  df-clab 2799  df-cleq 2813  df-clel 2892  df-nfc 2962  df-ral 3142  df-rex 3143  df-rab 3146  df-v 3493  df-dif 3932  df-un 3934  df-in 3936  df-ss 3945  df-nul 4285  df-if 4461  df-sn 4561  df-pr 4563  df-op 4567  df-br 5060  df-opab 5122  df-xp 5554  df-dm 5558

This theorem is referenced by:  fedgmullem2  31048