Theorem rzalf 39490

Description: A version of rzal 4106 using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 20-Apr-2017.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
rzalf.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 = ∅

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rzalf	⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)

Proof of Theorem rzalf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rzalf.1	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 = ∅
2		ne0i 3954	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅)
3	2	necon2bi 2853	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
4	3	pm2.21d 118	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑))
5	1, 4	ralrimi 2986	1 ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1523  Ⅎwnf 1748   ∈ wcel 2030  ∀wral 2941  ∅c0 3948

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1762  ax-4 1777  ax-5 1879  ax-6 1945  ax-7 1981  ax-9 2039  ax-10 2059  ax-11 2074  ax-12 2087  ax-13 2282  ax-ext 2631

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 384  df-an 385  df-tru 1526  df-ex 1745  df-nf 1750  df-sb 1938  df-clab 2638  df-cleq 2644  df-clel 2647  df-nfc 2782  df-ne 2824  df-ral 2946  df-v 3233  df-dif 3610  df-nul 3949

This theorem is referenced by:  stoweidlem18  40553  stoweidlem28  40563  stoweidlem55  40590