Theorem ccased 960

Description: Deduction for combining cases. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-2004.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ccased.1	⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜂))
ccased.2	⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜂))
ccased.3	⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂))
ccased.4	⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ccased	⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝜓 ∨ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜏)) → 𝜂))

Proof of Theorem ccased

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ccased.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜂))
2	1	com12 30	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜑 → 𝜂))
3		ccased.2	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜂))
4	3	com12 30	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜑 → 𝜂))
5		ccased.3	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂))
6	5	com12 30	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜏) → (𝜑 → 𝜂))
7		ccased.4	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂))
8	7	com12 30	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → (𝜑 → 𝜂))
9	2, 4, 6, 8	ccase 959	. 2 ⊢ (((𝜓 ∨ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜏)) → (𝜑 → 𝜂))
10	9	com12 30	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝜓 ∨ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜏)) → 𝜂))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 103   ∨ wo 703

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 704

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116

This theorem is referenced by:  zmulcl  9265  gcdabs  11943  lcmabs  12030  lgsdir2lem5  13727