P. 10 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 901-1000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	imordc 901	Implication in terms of disjunction for a decidable proposition. Based on theorem *4.6 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 120. The reverse direction, imorr 725, holds for all propositions. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Apr-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (¬ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)))
Theorem	pm4.62dc 902	Implication in terms of disjunction. Like Theorem *4.62 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 120, but for a decidable antecedent. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Apr-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → ((𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓) ↔ (¬ 𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜓)))
Theorem	ianordc 903	Negated conjunction in terms of disjunction (DeMorgan's law). Theorem *4.51 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 120, but where one proposition is decidable. The reverse direction, pm3.14 757, holds for all propositions, but the equivalence only holds where one proposition is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Apr-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (¬ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (¬ 𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜓)))
Theorem	pm4.64dc 904	Theorem *4.64 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 120, given a decidability condition. The reverse direction, pm2.53 726, holds for all propositions. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-May-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)))
Theorem	pm4.66dc 905	Theorem *4.66 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 120, given a decidability condition. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-May-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → ((¬ 𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜓)))
Theorem	pm4.54dc 906	Theorem *4.54 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 120, for decidable propositions. One form of DeMorgan's law. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-May-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (DECID 𝜓 → ((¬ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ¬ (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜓))))
Theorem	pm4.79dc 907	Equivalence between a disjunction of two implications, and a conjunction and an implication. Based on theorem *4.79 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 121 but with additional decidability antecedents. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Mar-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (DECID 𝜓 → (((𝜓 → 𝜑) ∨ (𝜒 → 𝜑)) ↔ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜑))))
Theorem	pm5.17dc 908	Two ways of stating exclusive-or which are equivalent for a decidable proposition. Based on theorem *5.17 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 124. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Apr-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜓 → (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∧ ¬ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) ↔ (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)))
Theorem	pm2.85dc 909	Reverse distribution of disjunction over implication, given decidability. Based on theorem *2.85 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 108. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Apr-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → (𝜑 ∨ 𝜒)) → (𝜑 ∨ (𝜓 → 𝜒))))
Theorem	orimdidc 910	Disjunction distributes over implication. The forward direction, pm2.76 812, is valid intuitionistically. The reverse direction holds if 𝜑 is decidable, as can be seen at pm2.85dc 909. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Apr-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → ((𝜑 ∨ (𝜓 → 𝜒)) ↔ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → (𝜑 ∨ 𝜒))))
Theorem	pm2.26dc 911	Decidable proposition version of theorem *2.26 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 104. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Apr-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (¬ 𝜑 ∨ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜓)))
Theorem	pm4.81dc 912	Theorem *4.81 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 122, for decidable propositions. This one needs a decidability condition, but compare with pm4.8 711 which holds for all propositions. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Jul-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜑))
Theorem	pm5.11dc 913	A decidable proposition or its negation implies a second proposition. Based on theorem *5.11 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 123. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Mar-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (DECID 𝜓 → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∨ (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓))))
Theorem	pm5.12dc 914	Excluded middle with antecedents for a decidable consequent. Based on theorem *5.12 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 123. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Mar-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜓 → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∨ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓)))
Theorem	pm5.14dc 915	A decidable proposition is implied by or implies other propositions. Based on theorem *5.14 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 123. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Mar-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜓 → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∨ (𝜓 → 𝜒)))
Theorem	pm5.13dc 916	An implication holds in at least one direction, where one proposition is decidable. Based on theorem *5.13 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 123. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Mar-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜓 → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∨ (𝜓 → 𝜑)))
Theorem	pm5.55dc 917	A disjunction is equivalent to one of its disjuncts, given a decidable disjunct. Based on theorem *5.55 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 125. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Mar-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ 𝜑) ∨ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ 𝜓)))
Theorem	peircedc 918	Peirce's theorem for a decidable proposition. This odd-looking theorem can be seen as an alternative to exmiddc 840, condc 857, or notnotrdc 847 in the sense of expressing the "difference" between an intuitionistic system of propositional calculus and a classical system. In intuitionistic logic, it only holds for decidable propositions. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Jul-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜑) → 𝜑))
Theorem	looinvdc 919	The Inversion Axiom of the infinite-valued sentential logic (L-infinity) of Lukasiewicz, but where one of the propositions is decidable. Using dfor2dc 899, we can see that this expresses "disjunction commutes." Theorem *2.69 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 108 (plus the decidability condition). (Contributed by NM, 12-Aug-2004.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜓) → ((𝜓 → 𝜑) → 𝜑)))
1.2.10  Miscellaneous theorems of propositional calculus
Theorem	pm5.21nd 920	Eliminate an antecedent implied by each side of a biconditional. (Contributed by NM, 20-Nov-2005.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 4-Nov-2013.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)    &   ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
Theorem	pm5.35 921	Theorem *5.35 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 125. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ (((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ (𝜑 → 𝜒)) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)))
Theorem	pm5.54dc 922	A conjunction is equivalent to one of its conjuncts, given a decidable conjunct. Based on theorem *5.54 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 125. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Mar-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ 𝜑) ∨ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ 𝜓)))
Theorem	baib 923	Move conjunction outside of biconditional. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-1999.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))
Theorem	baibr 924	Move conjunction outside of biconditional. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jul-1994.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜑))
Theorem	rbaib 925	Move conjunction outside of biconditional. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	rbaibr 926	Move conjunction outside of biconditional. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜑))
Theorem	baibd 927	Move conjunction outside of biconditional. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃))
Theorem	rbaibd 928	Move conjunction outside of biconditional. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
Theorem	pm5.44 929	Theorem *5.44 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 125. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜑 → 𝜒) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))))
Theorem	pm5.6dc 930	Conjunction in antecedent versus disjunction in consequent, for a decidable proposition. Theorem *5.6 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 125, with decidability condition added. The reverse implication holds for all propositions (see pm5.6r 931). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-Apr-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜓 → (((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒))))
Theorem	pm5.6r 931	Conjunction in antecedent versus disjunction in consequent. One direction of Theorem *5.6 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 125. If 𝜓 is decidable, the converse also holds (see pm5.6dc 930). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Aug-2018.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)) → ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) → 𝜒))
Theorem	orcanai 932	Change disjunction in consequent to conjunction in antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jun-1994.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) → 𝜒)
Theorem	intnan 933	Introduction of conjunct inside of a contradiction. (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-1993.)
⊢ ¬ 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜑)
Theorem	intnanr 934	Introduction of conjunct inside of a contradiction. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-1995.)
⊢ ¬ 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)
Theorem	intnand 935	Introduction of conjunct inside of a contradiction. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jul-2005.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	intnanrd 936	Introduction of conjunct inside of a contradiction. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jul-2005.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))
Theorem	dcand 937	A conjunction of two decidable propositions is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Apr-2018.) (Revised by BJ, 14-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → DECID 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → DECID 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → DECID (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))
Theorem	dcan 938	A conjunction of two decidable propositions is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Apr-2018.)
⊢ ((DECID 𝜑 ∧ DECID 𝜓) → DECID (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	dcan2 939	A conjunction of two decidable propositions is decidable, expressed in a curried form as compared to dcan 938. This is deprecated; it's trivial to recreate with ex 115, but it's here in case someone is using this older form. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Apr-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (DECID 𝜓 → DECID (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))
Theorem	dcor 940	A disjunction of two decidable propositions is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Apr-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (DECID 𝜓 → DECID (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)))
Theorem	dcbi 941	An equivalence of two decidable propositions is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Apr-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (DECID 𝜓 → DECID (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)))
Theorem	annimdc 942	Express conjunction in terms of implication. The forward direction, annimim 690, is valid for all propositions, but as an equivalence, it requires a decidability condition. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Apr-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (DECID 𝜓 → ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ↔ ¬ (𝜑 → 𝜓))))
Theorem	pm4.55dc 943	Theorem *4.55 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 120, for decidable propositions. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-May-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (DECID 𝜓 → (¬ (¬ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜓))))
Theorem	orandc 944	Disjunction in terms of conjunction (De Morgan's law), for decidable propositions. Compare Theorem *4.57 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 120. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ((DECID 𝜑 ∧ DECID 𝜓) → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ ¬ (¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)))
Theorem	mpbiran 945	Detach truth from conjunction in biconditional. (Contributed by NM, 27-Feb-1996.) (Revised by NM, 9-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)
Theorem	mpbiran2 946	Detach truth from conjunction in biconditional. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.) (Revised by NM, 9-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝜒    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)
Theorem	mpbir2an 947	Detach a conjunction of truths in a biconditional. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-2005.) (Revised by NM, 9-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ 𝜒    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜑
Theorem	mpbi2and 948	Detach a conjunction of truths in a biconditional. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 24-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃)
Theorem	mpbir2and 949	Detach a conjunction of truths in a biconditional. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 24-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	pm5.62dc 950	Theorem *5.62 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 125, for a decidable proposition. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-May-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜓 → (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∨ ¬ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜓)))
Theorem	pm5.63dc 951	Theorem *5.63 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 125, for a decidable proposition. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-May-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∨ (¬ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))))
Theorem	bianfi 952	A wff conjoined with falsehood is false. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 26-Nov-2012.)
⊢ ¬ 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	bianfd 953	A wff conjoined with falsehood is false. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-1995.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 5-Nov-2013.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)))
Theorem	pm4.43 954	Theorem *4.43 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 119. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 26-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜓)))
Theorem	pm4.82 955	Theorem *4.82 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 122. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ (((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓)) ↔ ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	pm4.83dc 956	Theorem *4.83 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 122, for decidable propositions. As with other case elimination theorems, like pm2.61dc 869, it only holds for decidable propositions. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-May-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓)) ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	biantr 957	A transitive law of equivalence. Compare Theorem *4.22 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 117. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓)) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))
Theorem	orbididc 958	Disjunction distributes over the biconditional, for a decidable proposition. Based on an axiom of system DS in Vladimir Lifschitz, "On calculational proofs" (1998), http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.25.3384. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-Apr-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → ((𝜑 ∨ (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ↔ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜒))))
Theorem	pm5.7dc 959	Disjunction distributes over the biconditional, for a decidable proposition. Based on theorem *5.7 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 125. This theorem is similar to orbididc 958. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-Apr-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜒 → (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)) ↔ (𝜒 ∨ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))))
Theorem	bigolden 960	Dijkstra-Scholten's Golden Rule for calculational proofs. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2005.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ 𝜑) ↔ (𝜓 ↔ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)))
Theorem	anordc 961	Conjunction in terms of disjunction (DeMorgan's law). Theorem *4.5 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 120, but where the propositions are decidable. The forward direction, pm3.1 758, holds for all propositions, but the equivalence only holds given decidability. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Apr-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (DECID 𝜓 → ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ¬ (¬ 𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜓))))
Theorem	pm3.11dc 962	Theorem *3.11 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 111, but for decidable propositions. The converse, pm3.1 758, holds for all propositions, not just decidable ones. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Apr-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (DECID 𝜓 → (¬ (¬ 𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜓) → (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))))
Theorem	pm3.12dc 963	Theorem *3.12 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 111, but for decidable propositions. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Apr-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (DECID 𝜓 → ((¬ 𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))))
Theorem	pm3.13dc 964	Theorem *3.13 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 111, but for decidable propositions. The converse, pm3.14 757, holds for all propositions. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Apr-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (DECID 𝜓 → (¬ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜓))))
Theorem	dn1dc 965	DN1 for decidable propositions. Without the decidability conditions, DN1 can serve as a single axiom for Boolean algebra. See http://www-unix.mcs.anl.gov/~mccune/papers/basax/v12.pdf. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Apr-2018.)
⊢ ((DECID 𝜑 ∧ (DECID 𝜓 ∧ (DECID 𝜒 ∧ DECID 𝜃))) → (¬ (¬ (¬ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ 𝜒) ∨ ¬ (𝜑 ∨ ¬ (¬ 𝜒 ∨ ¬ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜃)))) ↔ 𝜒))
Theorem	pm5.71dc 966	Decidable proposition version of theorem *5.71 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 125. (Contributed by Roy F. Longton, 23-Jun-2005.) (Modified for decidability by Jim Kingdon, 19-Apr-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜓 → ((𝜓 → ¬ 𝜒) → (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒))))
Theorem	pm5.75 967	Theorem *5.75 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 126. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 7-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 23-Dec-2012.)
⊢ (((𝜒 → ¬ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒))) → ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ↔ 𝜒))
Theorem	bimsc1 968	Removal of conjunct from one side of an equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
⊢ (((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜑))) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜑))
Theorem	ccase 969	Inference for combining cases. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jul-1999.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 6-Jan-2013.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜏)    &   ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜏)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)    &   ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ∧ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜃)) → 𝜏)
Theorem	ccased 970	Deduction for combining cases. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-2004.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜂))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜂))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝜓 ∨ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜏)) → 𝜂))
Theorem	ccase2 971	Inference for combining cases. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jul-1999.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜏)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝜏)    &   ⊢ (𝜃 → 𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ∧ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜃)) → 𝜏)
Theorem	niabn 972	Miscellaneous inference relating falsehoods. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1994.)
⊢ 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ 𝜓 → ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ¬ 𝜑))
Theorem	dedlem0a 973	Alternate version of dedlema 974. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 7-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 4-Dec-2012.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ ((𝜒 → 𝜑) → (𝜓 ∧ 𝜑))))
Theorem	dedlema 974	Lemma for iftrue 3587. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jun-2002.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 7-May-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) ∨ (𝜒 ∧ ¬ 𝜑))))
Theorem	dedlemb 975	Lemma for iffalse 3590. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 7-May-2011.)
⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → (𝜒 ↔ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) ∨ (𝜒 ∧ ¬ 𝜑))))
Theorem	pm4.42r 976	One direction of Theorem *4.42 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 119. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Aug-2018.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)) → 𝜑)
Theorem	ninba 977	Miscellaneous inference relating falsehoods. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1994.)
⊢ 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ 𝜓 → (¬ 𝜑 ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜓)))
Theorem	prlem1 978	A specialized lemma for set theory (to derive the Axiom of Pairing). (Contributed by NM, 18-Oct-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 13-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 5-Jan-2013.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜂 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → ¬ 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∨ (𝜃 ∧ 𝜏)) → 𝜂)))
Theorem	prlem2 979	A specialized lemma for set theory (to derive the Axiom of Pairing). (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 13-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 9-Dec-2012.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)) ↔ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ∧ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃))))
Theorem	oplem1 980	A specialized lemma for set theory (ordered pair theorem). (Contributed by NM, 18-Oct-1995.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 8-Dec-2012.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 2-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 ∨ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	rnlem 981	Lemma used in construction of real numbers. (Contributed by NM, 4-Sep-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)) ↔ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜃)) ∧ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))))
1.2.11  Abbreviated conjunction and disjunction of three wff's
Syntax	w3o 982	Extend wff definition to include 3-way disjunction ('or').
wff (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)
Syntax	w3a 983	Extend wff definition to include 3-way conjunction ('and').
wff (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)
Definition	df-3or 984	Define disjunction ('or') of 3 wff's. Definition *2.33 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 105. This abbreviation reduces the number of parentheses and emphasizes that the order of bracketing is not important by virtue of the associative law orass 771. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-1994.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ 𝜒))
Definition	df-3an 985	Define conjunction ('and') of 3 wff.s. Definition *4.34 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 118. This abbreviation reduces the number of parentheses and emphasizes that the order of bracketing is not important by virtue of the associative law anass 401. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-1994.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒))
Theorem	3orass 986	Associative law for triple disjunction. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-1994.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜑 ∨ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)))
Theorem	3anass 987	Associative law for triple conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-1994.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)))
Theorem	3anrot 988	Rotation law for triple conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-1994.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	3orrot 989	Rotation law for triple disjunction. (Contributed by NM, 4-Apr-1995.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜑))
Theorem	3ancoma 990	Commutation law for triple conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 21-Apr-1994.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒))
Theorem	3ancomb 991	Commutation law for triple conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 21-Apr-1994.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	3orcomb 992	Commutation law for triple disjunction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Apr-2011.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜓))
Theorem	3anrev 993	Reversal law for triple conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 21-Apr-1994.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	3anan32 994	Convert triple conjunction to conjunction, then commute. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	3anan12 995	Convert triple conjunction to conjunction, then commute. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)))
Theorem	anandi3 996	Distribution of triple conjunction over conjunction. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 4-Nov-2018.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)))
Theorem	anandi3r 997	Distribution of triple conjunction over conjunction. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 4-Nov-2018.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜓)))
Theorem	3ioran 998	Negated triple disjunction as triple conjunction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Apr-2011.)
⊢ (¬ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ (¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜒))
Theorem	3simpa 999	Simplification of triple conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 21-Apr-1994.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	3simpb 1000	Simplification of triple conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 21-Apr-1994.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒))