P. 10 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 901-1000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	pm4.66dc 901	Theorem *4.66 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 120, given a decidability condition. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-May-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → ((¬ 𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜓)))
Theorem	pm4.54dc 902	Theorem *4.54 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 120, for decidable propositions. One form of DeMorgan's law. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-May-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (DECID 𝜓 → ((¬ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ¬ (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜓))))
Theorem	pm4.79dc 903	Equivalence between a disjunction of two implications, and a conjunction and an implication. Based on theorem *4.79 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 121 but with additional decidability antecedents. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Mar-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (DECID 𝜓 → (((𝜓 → 𝜑) ∨ (𝜒 → 𝜑)) ↔ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜑))))
Theorem	pm5.17dc 904	Two ways of stating exclusive-or which are equivalent for a decidable proposition. Based on theorem *5.17 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 124. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Apr-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜓 → (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∧ ¬ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) ↔ (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓)))
Theorem	pm2.85dc 905	Reverse distribution of disjunction over implication, given decidability. Based on theorem *2.85 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 108. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Apr-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → (𝜑 ∨ 𝜒)) → (𝜑 ∨ (𝜓 → 𝜒))))
Theorem	orimdidc 906	Disjunction distributes over implication. The forward direction, pm2.76 808, is valid intuitionistically. The reverse direction holds if 𝜑 is decidable, as can be seen at pm2.85dc 905. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Apr-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → ((𝜑 ∨ (𝜓 → 𝜒)) ↔ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → (𝜑 ∨ 𝜒))))
Theorem	pm2.26dc 907	Decidable proposition version of theorem *2.26 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 104. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Apr-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (¬ 𝜑 ∨ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜓)))
Theorem	pm4.81dc 908	Theorem *4.81 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 122, for decidable propositions. This one needs a decidability condition, but compare with pm4.8 707 which holds for all propositions. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Jul-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜑))
Theorem	pm5.11dc 909	A decidable proposition or its negation implies a second proposition. Based on theorem *5.11 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 123. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Mar-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (DECID 𝜓 → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∨ (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓))))
Theorem	pm5.12dc 910	Excluded middle with antecedents for a decidable consequent. Based on theorem *5.12 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 123. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Mar-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜓 → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∨ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓)))
Theorem	pm5.14dc 911	A decidable proposition is implied by or implies other propositions. Based on theorem *5.14 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 123. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Mar-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜓 → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∨ (𝜓 → 𝜒)))
Theorem	pm5.13dc 912	An implication holds in at least one direction, where one proposition is decidable. Based on theorem *5.13 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 123. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Mar-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜓 → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∨ (𝜓 → 𝜑)))
Theorem	pm5.55dc 913	A disjunction is equivalent to one of its disjuncts, given a decidable disjunct. Based on theorem *5.55 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 125. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Mar-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ 𝜑) ∨ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ 𝜓)))
Theorem	peircedc 914	Peirce's theorem for a decidable proposition. This odd-looking theorem can be seen as an alternative to exmiddc 836, condc 853, or notnotrdc 843 in the sense of expressing the "difference" between an intuitionistic system of propositional calculus and a classical system. In intuitionistic logic, it only holds for decidable propositions. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Jul-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜑) → 𝜑))
Theorem	looinvdc 915	The Inversion Axiom of the infinite-valued sentential logic (L-infinity) of Lukasiewicz, but where one of the propositions is decidable. Using dfor2dc 895, we can see that this expresses "disjunction commutes." Theorem *2.69 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 108 (plus the decidability condition). (Contributed by NM, 12-Aug-2004.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜓) → ((𝜓 → 𝜑) → 𝜑)))
1.2.10  Miscellaneous theorems of propositional calculus
Theorem	pm5.21nd 916	Eliminate an antecedent implied by each side of a biconditional. (Contributed by NM, 20-Nov-2005.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 4-Nov-2013.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)    &   ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
Theorem	pm5.35 917	Theorem *5.35 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 125. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ (((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ (𝜑 → 𝜒)) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)))
Theorem	pm5.54dc 918	A conjunction is equivalent to one of its conjuncts, given a decidable conjunct. Based on theorem *5.54 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 125. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Mar-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ 𝜑) ∨ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ 𝜓)))
Theorem	baib 919	Move conjunction outside of biconditional. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-1999.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))
Theorem	baibr 920	Move conjunction outside of biconditional. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jul-1994.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜑))
Theorem	rbaib 921	Move conjunction outside of biconditional. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	rbaibr 922	Move conjunction outside of biconditional. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜑))
Theorem	baibd 923	Move conjunction outside of biconditional. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃))
Theorem	rbaibd 924	Move conjunction outside of biconditional. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
Theorem	pm5.44 925	Theorem *5.44 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 125. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜑 → 𝜒) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))))
Theorem	pm5.6dc 926	Conjunction in antecedent versus disjunction in consequent, for a decidable proposition. Theorem *5.6 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 125, with decidability condition added. The reverse implication holds for all propositions (see pm5.6r 927). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-Apr-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜓 → (((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒))))
Theorem	pm5.6r 927	Conjunction in antecedent versus disjunction in consequent. One direction of Theorem *5.6 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 125. If 𝜓 is decidable, the converse also holds (see pm5.6dc 926). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Aug-2018.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)) → ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) → 𝜒))
Theorem	orcanai 928	Change disjunction in consequent to conjunction in antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jun-1994.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) → 𝜒)
Theorem	intnan 929	Introduction of conjunct inside of a contradiction. (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-1993.)
⊢ ¬ 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜑)
Theorem	intnanr 930	Introduction of conjunct inside of a contradiction. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-1995.)
⊢ ¬ 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)
Theorem	intnand 931	Introduction of conjunct inside of a contradiction. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jul-2005.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	intnanrd 932	Introduction of conjunct inside of a contradiction. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jul-2005.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))
Theorem	dcan 933	A conjunction of two decidable propositions is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Apr-2018.)
⊢ ((DECID 𝜑 ∧ DECID 𝜓) → DECID (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	dcan2 934	A conjunction of two decidable propositions is decidable, expressed in a curried form as compared to dcan 933. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Apr-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (DECID 𝜓 → DECID (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))
Theorem	dcor 935	A disjunction of two decidable propositions is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Apr-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (DECID 𝜓 → DECID (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)))
Theorem	dcbi 936	An equivalence of two decidable propositions is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Apr-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (DECID 𝜓 → DECID (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)))
Theorem	annimdc 937	Express conjunction in terms of implication. The forward direction, annimim 686, is valid for all propositions, but as an equivalence, it requires a decidability condition. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Apr-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (DECID 𝜓 → ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ↔ ¬ (𝜑 → 𝜓))))
Theorem	pm4.55dc 938	Theorem *4.55 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 120, for decidable propositions. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-May-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (DECID 𝜓 → (¬ (¬ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜓))))
Theorem	orandc 939	Disjunction in terms of conjunction (De Morgan's law), for decidable propositions. Compare Theorem *4.57 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 120. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ((DECID 𝜑 ∧ DECID 𝜓) → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ ¬ (¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)))
Theorem	mpbiran 940	Detach truth from conjunction in biconditional. (Contributed by NM, 27-Feb-1996.) (Revised by NM, 9-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)
Theorem	mpbiran2 941	Detach truth from conjunction in biconditional. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.) (Revised by NM, 9-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝜒    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)
Theorem	mpbir2an 942	Detach a conjunction of truths in a biconditional. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-2005.) (Revised by NM, 9-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ 𝜒    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜑
Theorem	mpbi2and 943	Detach a conjunction of truths in a biconditional. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 24-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃)
Theorem	mpbir2and 944	Detach a conjunction of truths in a biconditional. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 24-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	pm5.62dc 945	Theorem *5.62 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 125, for a decidable proposition. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-May-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜓 → (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∨ ¬ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜓)))
Theorem	pm5.63dc 946	Theorem *5.63 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 125, for a decidable proposition. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-May-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∨ (¬ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))))
Theorem	bianfi 947	A wff conjoined with falsehood is false. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 26-Nov-2012.)
⊢ ¬ 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	bianfd 948	A wff conjoined with falsehood is false. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-1995.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 5-Nov-2013.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)))
Theorem	pm4.43 949	Theorem *4.43 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 119. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 26-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜓)))
Theorem	pm4.82 950	Theorem *4.82 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 122. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ (((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓)) ↔ ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	pm4.83dc 951	Theorem *4.83 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 122, for decidable propositions. As with other case elimination theorems, like pm2.61dc 865, it only holds for decidable propositions. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-May-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓)) ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	biantr 952	A transitive law of equivalence. Compare Theorem *4.22 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 117. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓)) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))
Theorem	orbididc 953	Disjunction distributes over the biconditional, for a decidable proposition. Based on an axiom of system DS in Vladimir Lifschitz, "On calculational proofs" (1998), http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.25.3384. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-Apr-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → ((𝜑 ∨ (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ↔ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜒))))
Theorem	pm5.7dc 954	Disjunction distributes over the biconditional, for a decidable proposition. Based on theorem *5.7 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 125. This theorem is similar to orbididc 953. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-Apr-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜒 → (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)) ↔ (𝜒 ∨ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))))
Theorem	bigolden 955	Dijkstra-Scholten's Golden Rule for calculational proofs. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2005.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ 𝜑) ↔ (𝜓 ↔ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)))
Theorem	anordc 956	Conjunction in terms of disjunction (DeMorgan's law). Theorem *4.5 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 120, but where the propositions are decidable. The forward direction, pm3.1 754, holds for all propositions, but the equivalence only holds given decidability. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Apr-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (DECID 𝜓 → ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ¬ (¬ 𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜓))))
Theorem	pm3.11dc 957	Theorem *3.11 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 111, but for decidable propositions. The converse, pm3.1 754, holds for all propositions, not just decidable ones. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Apr-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (DECID 𝜓 → (¬ (¬ 𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜓) → (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))))
Theorem	pm3.12dc 958	Theorem *3.12 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 111, but for decidable propositions. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Apr-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (DECID 𝜓 → ((¬ 𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))))
Theorem	pm3.13dc 959	Theorem *3.13 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 111, but for decidable propositions. The converse, pm3.14 753, holds for all propositions. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Apr-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (DECID 𝜓 → (¬ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜓))))
Theorem	dn1dc 960	DN1 for decidable propositions. Without the decidability conditions, DN1 can serve as a single axiom for Boolean algebra. See http://www-unix.mcs.anl.gov/~mccune/papers/basax/v12.pdf. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Apr-2018.)
⊢ ((DECID 𝜑 ∧ (DECID 𝜓 ∧ (DECID 𝜒 ∧ DECID 𝜃))) → (¬ (¬ (¬ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ 𝜒) ∨ ¬ (𝜑 ∨ ¬ (¬ 𝜒 ∨ ¬ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜃)))) ↔ 𝜒))
Theorem	pm5.71dc 961	Decidable proposition version of theorem *5.71 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 125. (Contributed by Roy F. Longton, 23-Jun-2005.) (Modified for decidability by Jim Kingdon, 19-Apr-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜓 → ((𝜓 → ¬ 𝜒) → (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒))))
Theorem	pm5.75 962	Theorem *5.75 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 126. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 7-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 23-Dec-2012.)
⊢ (((𝜒 → ¬ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒))) → ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ↔ 𝜒))
Theorem	bimsc1 963	Removal of conjunct from one side of an equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
⊢ (((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜑))) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜑))
Theorem	ccase 964	Inference for combining cases. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jul-1999.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 6-Jan-2013.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜏)    &   ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜏)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)    &   ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ∧ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜃)) → 𝜏)
Theorem	ccased 965	Deduction for combining cases. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-2004.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜂))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜂))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝜓 ∨ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜏)) → 𝜂))
Theorem	ccase2 966	Inference for combining cases. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jul-1999.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜏)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝜏)    &   ⊢ (𝜃 → 𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ∧ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜃)) → 𝜏)
Theorem	niabn 967	Miscellaneous inference relating falsehoods. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1994.)
⊢ 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ 𝜓 → ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ¬ 𝜑))
Theorem	dedlem0a 968	Alternate version of dedlema 969. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 7-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 4-Dec-2012.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ ((𝜒 → 𝜑) → (𝜓 ∧ 𝜑))))
Theorem	dedlema 969	Lemma for iftrue 3537. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jun-2002.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 7-May-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) ∨ (𝜒 ∧ ¬ 𝜑))))
Theorem	dedlemb 970	Lemma for iffalse 3540. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 7-May-2011.)
⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → (𝜒 ↔ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) ∨ (𝜒 ∧ ¬ 𝜑))))
Theorem	pm4.42r 971	One direction of Theorem *4.42 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 119. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Aug-2018.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)) → 𝜑)
Theorem	ninba 972	Miscellaneous inference relating falsehoods. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1994.)
⊢ 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ 𝜓 → (¬ 𝜑 ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜓)))
Theorem	prlem1 973	A specialized lemma for set theory (to derive the Axiom of Pairing). (Contributed by NM, 18-Oct-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 13-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 5-Jan-2013.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜂 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → ¬ 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∨ (𝜃 ∧ 𝜏)) → 𝜂)))
Theorem	prlem2 974	A specialized lemma for set theory (to derive the Axiom of Pairing). (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 13-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 9-Dec-2012.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)) ↔ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ∧ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃))))
Theorem	oplem1 975	A specialized lemma for set theory (ordered pair theorem). (Contributed by NM, 18-Oct-1995.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 8-Dec-2012.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 2-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 ∨ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	rnlem 976	Lemma used in construction of real numbers. (Contributed by NM, 4-Sep-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)) ↔ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜃)) ∧ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))))
1.2.11  Abbreviated conjunction and disjunction of three wff's
Syntax	w3o 977	Extend wff definition to include 3-way disjunction ('or').
wff (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)
Syntax	w3a 978	Extend wff definition to include 3-way conjunction ('and').
wff (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)
Definition	df-3or 979	Define disjunction ('or') of 3 wff's. Definition *2.33 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 105. This abbreviation reduces the number of parentheses and emphasizes that the order of bracketing is not important by virtue of the associative law orass 767. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-1994.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ 𝜒))
Definition	df-3an 980	Define conjunction ('and') of 3 wff.s. Definition *4.34 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 118. This abbreviation reduces the number of parentheses and emphasizes that the order of bracketing is not important by virtue of the associative law anass 401. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-1994.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒))
Theorem	3orass 981	Associative law for triple disjunction. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-1994.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜑 ∨ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)))
Theorem	3anass 982	Associative law for triple conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-1994.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)))
Theorem	3anrot 983	Rotation law for triple conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-1994.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	3orrot 984	Rotation law for triple disjunction. (Contributed by NM, 4-Apr-1995.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜑))
Theorem	3ancoma 985	Commutation law for triple conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 21-Apr-1994.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒))
Theorem	3ancomb 986	Commutation law for triple conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 21-Apr-1994.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	3orcomb 987	Commutation law for triple disjunction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Apr-2011.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜓))
Theorem	3anrev 988	Reversal law for triple conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 21-Apr-1994.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	3anan32 989	Convert triple conjunction to conjunction, then commute. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	3anan12 990	Convert triple conjunction to conjunction, then commute. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)))
Theorem	anandi3 991	Distribution of triple conjunction over conjunction. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 4-Nov-2018.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)))
Theorem	anandi3r 992	Distribution of triple conjunction over conjunction. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 4-Nov-2018.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜓)))
Theorem	3ioran 993	Negated triple disjunction as triple conjunction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Apr-2011.)
⊢ (¬ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ (¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜒))
Theorem	3simpa 994	Simplification of triple conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 21-Apr-1994.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	3simpb 995	Simplification of triple conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 21-Apr-1994.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒))
Theorem	3simpc 996	Simplification of triple conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 21-Apr-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 13-May-2011.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))
Theorem	simp1 997	Simplification of triple conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 21-Apr-1994.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜑)
Theorem	simp2 998	Simplification of triple conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 21-Apr-1994.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜓)
Theorem	simp3 999	Simplification of triple conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 21-Apr-1994.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜒)
Theorem	simpl1 1000	Simplification rule. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 17-Nov-2009.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜑)