| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > const | GIF version | ||
| Description: Contraposition when the antecedent is a negated stable proposition. See comment of condc 854. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Nov-2023.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 11-Nov-2024.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| const | ⊢ (STAB 𝜑 → ((¬ 𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓) → (𝜓 → 𝜑))) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | con2 644 | . 2 ⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓) → (𝜓 → ¬ ¬ 𝜑)) | |
| 2 | df-stab 832 | . . 3 ⊢ (STAB 𝜑 ↔ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑)) | |
| 3 | 2 | biimpi 120 | . 2 ⊢ (STAB 𝜑 → (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑)) |
| 4 | 1, 3 | syl9r 73 | 1 ⊢ (STAB 𝜑 → ((¬ 𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓) → (𝜓 → 𝜑))) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 STAB wstab 831 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-in1 615 ax-in2 616 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-stab 832 |
| This theorem is referenced by: condc 854 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |