Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > const | GIF version |
Description: Contraposition when the antecedent is a negated stable proposition. See comment of condc 848. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Nov-2023.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 11-Nov-2024.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
const | ⊢ (STAB 𝜑 → ((¬ 𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓) → (𝜓 → 𝜑))) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | con2 638 | . 2 ⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓) → (𝜓 → ¬ ¬ 𝜑)) | |
2 | df-stab 826 | . . 3 ⊢ (STAB 𝜑 ↔ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑)) | |
3 | 2 | biimpi 119 | . 2 ⊢ (STAB 𝜑 → (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑)) |
4 | 1, 3 | syl9r 73 | 1 ⊢ (STAB 𝜑 → ((¬ 𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓) → (𝜓 → 𝜑))) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 STAB wstab 825 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 105 ax-in1 609 ax-in2 610 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 116 df-stab 826 |
This theorem is referenced by: condc 848 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |