Theorem adh-minim-ax2 47906

Description: Derivation of ax-2 7 from adh-minim 47897 and ax-mp 5. Carew Arthur Meredith derived ax-2 7 in A single axiom of positive logic, The Journal of Computing Systems, volume 1, issue 3, July 1953, pages 169--170. However, here we follow the shortened derivation by Ivo Thomas, On Meredith's sole positive axiom, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, volume XV, number 3, July 1974, page 477. Polish prefix notation: CCpCqrCCpqCpr . (Contributed by ADH, 10-Nov-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
adh-minim-ax2	⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → 𝜒)))

Proof of Theorem adh-minim-ax2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		adh-minim-ax2c 47905	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜑 → 𝜒)))
2		adh-minim-ax1-ax2-lem3 47900	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜑 → 𝜒))) → ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ((((𝜃 → 𝜏) → 𝜂) → ((𝜏 → (𝜂 → 𝜁)) → (𝜏 → 𝜁))) → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → 𝜒)))))
3	1, 2	ax-mp 5	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ((((𝜃 → 𝜏) → 𝜂) → ((𝜏 → (𝜂 → 𝜁)) → (𝜏 → 𝜁))) → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → 𝜒))))
4		adh-minim-ax2-lem6 47904	. 2 ⊢ (((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ((((𝜃 → 𝜏) → 𝜂) → ((𝜏 → (𝜂 → 𝜁)) → (𝜏 → 𝜁))) → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → 𝜒)))) → ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → 𝜒))))
5	3, 4	ax-mp 5	1 ⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → 𝜒)))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7

This theorem is used by:  adh-minim-idALT  47907  adh-minim-pm2.43  47908