Theorem adh-minim-ax2 48024

Description: Derivation of ax-2 7 from adh-minim 48015 and ax-mp 5. Carew Arthur Meredith derived ax-2 7 in A single axiom of positive logic, The Journal of Computing Systems, volume 1, issue 3, July 1953, pages 169--170. However, here we follow the shortened derivation by Ivo Thomas, On Meredith's sole positive axiom, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, volume XV, number 3, July 1974, page 477. Polish prefix notation: CCpCqrCCpqCpr . (Contributed by ADH, 10-Nov-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
adh-minim-ax2	⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → 𝜒)))

Proof of Theorem adh-minim-ax2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		adh-minim-ax2c 48023	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜑 → 𝜒)))
2		adh-minim-ax1-ax2-lem3 48018	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜑 → 𝜒))) → ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ((((𝜃 → 𝜏) → 𝜂) → ((𝜏 → (𝜂 → 𝜁)) → (𝜏 → 𝜁))) → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → 𝜒)))))
3	1, 2	ax-mp 5	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ((((𝜃 → 𝜏) → 𝜂) → ((𝜏 → (𝜂 → 𝜁)) → (𝜏 → 𝜁))) → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → 𝜒))))
4		adh-minim-ax2-lem6 48022	. 2 ⊢ (((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ((((𝜃 → 𝜏) → 𝜂) → ((𝜏 → (𝜂 → 𝜁)) → (𝜏 → 𝜁))) → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → 𝜒)))) → ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → 𝜒))))
5	3, 4	ax-mp 5	1 ⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → 𝜒)))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7

This theorem is used by:  adh-minim-idALT  48025  adh-minim-pm2.43  48026