| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 465 of 506) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31236) |
(31237-32759) |
(32760-50572) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | limsupvaluzmpt 46401* | The superior limit, when the domain of the function is a set of upper integers (the first condition is needed, otherwise the l.h.s. would be -∞ and the r.h.s. would be +∞). (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘(𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ 𝐵)) = inf(ran (𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ sup(ran (𝑗 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑘) ↦ 𝐵), ℝ*, < )), ℝ*, < )) | ||
| Theorem | limsupequzmpt2 46402* | Two functions that are eventually equal to one another have the same superior limit. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐵 & ⊢ 𝐴 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (ℤ≥‘𝑁) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐾)) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘(𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶)) = (lim sup‘(𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | limsupubuzmpt 46403* | If the limsup is not +∞, then the function is eventually bounded. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝜑 & ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘(𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ 𝐵)) ≠ +∞) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 𝐵 ≤ 𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | limsupmnflem 46404* | The superior limit of a function is -∞ if and only if every real number is the upper bound of the restriction of the function to an upper interval of real numbers. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ*) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)), ℝ*, < )) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lim sup‘𝐹) = -∞ ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 → (𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝑥))) | ||
| Theorem | limsupmnf 46405* | The superior limit of a function is -∞ if and only if every real number is the upper bound of the restriction of the function to an upper interval of real numbers. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐹 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ*) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lim sup‘𝐹) = -∞ ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 → (𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝑥))) | ||
| Theorem | limsupequzlem 46406* | Two functions that are eventually equal to one another have the same superior limit. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn (ℤ≥‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐾)) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = (𝐺‘𝑘)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) = (lim sup‘𝐺)) | ||
| Theorem | limsupequz 46407* | Two functions that are eventually equal to one another have the same superior limit. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝐹 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝐺 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn (ℤ≥‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐾)) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = (𝐺‘𝑘)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) = (lim sup‘𝐺)) | ||
| Theorem | limsupre2lem 46408* | Given a function on the extended reals, its supremum limit is real if and only if two condition holds: 1. there is a real number that is smaller than the function, at some point, in any upper part of the reals; 2. there is a real number that is eventually larger than the function. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐹 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ*) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 ∧ 𝑥 < (𝐹‘𝑗)) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 → (𝐹‘𝑗) < 𝑥)))) | ||
| Theorem | limsupre2 46409* | Given a function on the extended reals, its supremum limit is real if and only if two condition holds: 1. there is a real number that is smaller than the function, at some point, in any upper part of the reals; 2. there is a real number that is eventually larger than the function. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐹 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ*) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 ∧ 𝑥 < (𝐹‘𝑗)) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 → (𝐹‘𝑗) < 𝑥)))) | ||
| Theorem | limsupmnfuzlem 46410* | The superior limit of a function is -∞ if and only if every real number is the upper bound of the restriction of the function to a set of upper integers. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ*) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lim sup‘𝐹) = -∞ ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑗 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑘)(𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | limsupmnfuz 46411* | The superior limit of a function is -∞ if and only if every real number is the upper bound of the restriction of the function to a set of upper integers. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐹 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ*) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lim sup‘𝐹) = -∞ ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑗 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑘)(𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | limsupequzmptlem 46412* | Two functions that are eventually equal to one another have the same superior limit. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (ℤ≥‘𝑁) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = if(𝑀 ≤ 𝑁, 𝑁, 𝑀) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘(𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶)) = (lim sup‘(𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | limsupequzmpt 46413* | Two functions that are eventually equal to one another have the same superior limit. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (ℤ≥‘𝑁) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘(𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶)) = (lim sup‘(𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | limsupre2mpt 46414* | Given a function on the extended reals, its supremum limit is real if and only if two condition holds: 1. there is a real number that is smaller than the function, at some point, in any upper part of the reals; 2. there is a real number that is eventually larger than the function. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lim sup‘(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)) ∈ ℝ ↔ (∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑦 < 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑥 → 𝐵 < 𝑦)))) | ||
| Theorem | limsupequzmptf 46415* | Two functions that are eventually equal to one another have the same superior limit. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐵 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (ℤ≥‘𝑁) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘(𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶)) = (lim sup‘(𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | limsupre3lem 46416* | Given a function on the extended reals, its supremum limit is real if and only if two condition holds: 1. there is a real number that is less than or equal to the function, at some point, in any upper part of the reals; 2. there is a real number that is eventually greater than or equal to the function. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐹 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ*) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 ∧ 𝑥 ≤ (𝐹‘𝑗)) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 → (𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝑥)))) | ||
| Theorem | limsupre3 46417* | Given a function on the extended reals, its supremum limit is real if and only if two condition holds: 1. there is a real number that is less than or equal to the function, at some point, in any upper part of the reals; 2. there is a real number that is eventually greater than or equal to the function. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐹 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ*) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 ∧ 𝑥 ≤ (𝐹‘𝑗)) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 → (𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝑥)))) | ||
| Theorem | limsupre3mpt 46418* | Given a function on the extended reals, its supremum limit is real if and only if two condition holds: 1. there is a real number that is less than or equal to the function, at some point, in any upper part of the reals; 2. there is a real number that is eventually greater than or equal to the function. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lim sup‘(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)) ∈ ℝ ↔ (∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑦 ≤ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑥 → 𝐵 ≤ 𝑦)))) | ||
| Theorem | limsupre3uzlem 46419* | Given a function on the extended reals, its supremum limit is real if and only if two condition holds: 1. there is a real number that is less than or equal to the function, infinitely often; 2. there is a real number that is eventually greater than or equal to the function. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐹 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ*) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ∃𝑗 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑘)𝑥 ≤ (𝐹‘𝑗) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑗 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑘)(𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝑥))) | ||
| Theorem | limsupre3uz 46420* | Given a function on the extended reals, its supremum limit is real if and only if two condition holds: 1. there is a real number that is less than or equal to the function, infinitely often; 2. there is a real number that is eventually greater than or equal to the function. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐹 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ*) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ∃𝑗 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑘)𝑥 ≤ (𝐹‘𝑗) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑗 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑘)(𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝑥))) | ||
| Theorem | limsupreuz 46421* | Given a function on the reals, its supremum limit is real if and only if two condition holds: 1. there is a real number that is less than or equal to the function, infinitely often; 2. there is a real number that is greater than or equal to the function. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐹 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ∃𝑗 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑘)𝑥 ≤ (𝐹‘𝑗) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 (𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝑥))) | ||
| Theorem | limsupvaluz2 46422* | The superior limit, when the domain of a real-valued function is a set of upper integers, and the superior limit is real. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) = inf(ran (𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ sup(ran (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑘)), ℝ*, < )), ℝ, < )) | ||
| Theorem | limsupreuzmpt 46423* | Given a function on the reals, defined on a set of upper integers, its supremum limit is real if and only if two condition holds: 1. there is a real number that is less than or equal to the function, infinitely often; 2. there is a real number that is greater than or equal to the function. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lim sup‘(𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ 𝐵)) ∈ ℝ ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ∃𝑗 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑘)𝑥 ≤ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 𝐵 ≤ 𝑥))) | ||
| Theorem | supcnvlimsup 46424* | If a function on a set of upper integers has a real superior limit, the supremum of the rightmost parts of the function, converges to that superior limit. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ sup(ran (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑘)), ℝ*, < )) ⇝ (lim sup‘𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | supcnvlimsupmpt 46425* | If a function on a set of upper integers has a real superior limit, the supremum of the rightmost parts of the function, converges to that superior limit. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘(𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ 𝐵)) ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ sup(ran (𝑗 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑘) ↦ 𝐵), ℝ*, < )) ⇝ (lim sup‘(𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | 0cnv 46426 | If ∅ is a complex number, then it converges to itself. See 0ncn 11117 and its comment; see also the comment in climlimsupcex 46453. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ (∅ ∈ ℂ → ∅ ⇝ ∅) | ||
| Theorem | climuzlem 46427* | Express the predicate: The limit of complex number sequence 𝐹 is 𝐴, or 𝐹 converges to 𝐴. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(abs‘((𝐹‘𝑘) − 𝐴)) < 𝑥))) | ||
| Theorem | climuz 46428* | Express the predicate: The limit of complex number sequence 𝐹 is 𝐴, or 𝐹 converges to 𝐴. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝐹 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(abs‘((𝐹‘𝑘) − 𝐴)) < 𝑥))) | ||
| Theorem | lmbr3v 46429* | Express the binary relation "sequence 𝐹 converges to point 𝑃 " in a metric space using an arbitrary upper set of integers. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Feb-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ (TopOn‘𝑋)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(⇝𝑡‘𝐽)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋 ↑pm ℂ) ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑃 ∈ 𝑢 → ∃𝑗 ∈ ℤ ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(𝑘 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ 𝑢))))) | ||
| Theorem | climisp 46430* | If a sequence converges to an isolated point (w.r.t. the standard topology on the complex numbers) then the sequence eventually becomes that point. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Feb-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘) ≠ 𝐴) → 𝑋 ≤ (abs‘((𝐹‘𝑘) − 𝐴))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | lmbr3 46431* | Express the binary relation "sequence 𝐹 converges to point 𝑃 " in a metric space using an arbitrary upper set of integers. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Feb-2022.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝐹 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ (TopOn‘𝑋)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(⇝𝑡‘𝐽)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋 ↑pm ℂ) ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑃 ∈ 𝑢 → ∃𝑗 ∈ ℤ ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(𝑘 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ 𝑢))))) | ||
| Theorem | climrescn 46432* | A sequence converging w.r.t. the standard topology on the complex numbers, eventually becomes a sequence of complex numbers. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Feb-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝ ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)):(ℤ≥‘𝑗)⟶ℂ) | ||
| Theorem | climxrrelem 46433* | If a sequence ranging over the extended reals converges w.r.t. the standard topology on the complex numbers, then there exists an upper set of the integers over which the function is real-valued. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Feb-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ*) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ +∞ ∈ ℂ) → 𝐷 ≤ (abs‘(+∞ − 𝐴))) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ -∞ ∈ ℂ) → 𝐷 ≤ (abs‘(-∞ − 𝐴))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)):(ℤ≥‘𝑗)⟶ℝ) | ||
| Theorem | climxrre 46434* | If a sequence ranging over the extended reals converges w.r.t. the standard topology on the complex numbers, then there exists an upper set of the integers over which the function is real-valued (the weaker hypothesis 𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝ is probably not enough, since in principle we could have +∞ ∈ ℂ and -∞ ∈ ℂ). (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Feb-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ*) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 (𝐹 ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)):(ℤ≥‘𝑗)⟶ℝ) | ||
| Syntax | clsi 46435 | Extend class notation to include the liminf function. (actually, it makes sense for any extended real function defined on a subset of RR which is not upper-bounded) |
| class lim inf | ||
| Definition | df-liminf 46436* | Define the inferior limit of a sequence of extended real numbers. (Contributed by GS, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ lim inf = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ sup(ran (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ inf(((𝑥 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < )), ℝ*, < )) | ||
| Theorem | limsuplt2 46437* | The defining property of the superior limit. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ*) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lim sup‘𝐹) < 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑘 ∈ ℝ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ) < 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | liminfgord 46438 | Ordering property of the inferior limit function. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) → inf(((𝐹 “ (𝐴[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ) ≤ inf(((𝐹 “ (𝐵[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < )) | ||
| Theorem | limsupvald 46439* | The superior limit of a sequence 𝐹 of extended real numbers is the infimum of the set of suprema of all restrictions of 𝐹 to an upperset of reals . (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < )) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) = inf(ran 𝐺, ℝ*, < )) | ||
| Theorem | limsupresicompt 46440* | The superior limit doesn't change when a function is restricted to the upper part of the reals. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝑀[,)+∞) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)) = (lim sup‘(𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝑍) ↦ 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | limsupcli 46441 | Closure of the superior limit. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ⇒ ⊢ (lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ* | ||
| Theorem | liminfgf 46442 | Closure of the inferior limit function. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ inf(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < )) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐺:ℝ⟶ℝ* | ||
| Theorem | liminfval 46443* | The inferior limit of a set 𝐹. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ inf(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < )) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → (lim inf‘𝐹) = sup(ran 𝐺, ℝ*, < )) | ||
| Theorem | climlimsup 46444 | A sequence of real numbers converges if and only if it converges to its superior limit. The first hypothesis is needed (see climlimsupcex 46453 for a counterexample). (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝ ↔ 𝐹 ⇝ (lim sup‘𝐹))) | ||
| Theorem | limsupge 46445* | The defining property of the superior limit. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ*) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≤ (lim sup‘𝐹) ↔ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℝ 𝐴 ≤ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))) | ||
| Theorem | liminfgval 46446* | Value of the inferior limit function. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ inf(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < )) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℝ → (𝐺‘𝑀) = inf(((𝐹 “ (𝑀[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < )) | ||
| Theorem | liminfcl 46447 | Closure of the inferior limit. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → (lim inf‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ*) | ||
| Theorem | liminfvald 46448* | The inferior limit of a set 𝐹. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ inf(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < )) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘𝐹) = sup(ran 𝐺, ℝ*, < )) | ||
| Theorem | liminfval5 46449* | The inferior limit of an infinite sequence 𝐹 of extended real numbers. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ*) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ inf((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)), ℝ*, < )) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘𝐹) = sup(ran 𝐺, ℝ*, < )) | ||
| Theorem | limsupresxr 46450 | The superior limit of a function only depends on the restriction of that function to the preimage of the set of extended reals. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (◡𝐹 “ ℝ*) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘(𝐹 ↾ 𝐴)) = (lim sup‘𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | liminfresxr 46451 | The inferior limit of a function only depends on the preimage of the extended real part. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (◡𝐹 “ ℝ*) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘(𝐹 ↾ 𝐴)) = (lim inf‘𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | liminfval2 46452* | The superior limit, relativized to an unbounded set. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ inf(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < )) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐴, ℝ*, < ) = +∞) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘𝐹) = sup((𝐺 “ 𝐴), ℝ*, < )) | ||
| Theorem | climlimsupcex 46453 | Counterexample for climlimsup 46444, showing that the first hypothesis is needed, if the empty set is a complex number (see 0ncn 11117 and its comment). (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ ¬ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ & ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝐹 = ∅ ⇒ ⊢ ((∅ ∈ ℂ ∧ ¬ -∞ ∈ ℂ) → (𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ ∧ 𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝ ∧ ¬ 𝐹 ⇝ (lim sup‘𝐹))) | ||
| Theorem | liminfcld 46454 | Closure of the inferior limit. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ*) | ||
| Theorem | liminfresico 46455 | The inferior limit doesn't change when a function is restricted to an upperset of reals. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝑀[,)+∞) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘(𝐹 ↾ 𝑍)) = (lim inf‘𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | limsup10exlem 46456* | The range of the given function. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(2 ∥ 𝑛, 0, 1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 “ (𝐾[,)+∞)) = {0, 1}) | ||
| Theorem | limsup10ex 46457 | The superior limit of a function that alternates between two values. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(2 ∥ 𝑛, 0, 1)) ⇒ ⊢ (lim sup‘𝐹) = 1 | ||
| Theorem | liminf10ex 46458 | The inferior limit of a function that alternates between two values. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(2 ∥ 𝑛, 0, 1)) ⇒ ⊢ (lim inf‘𝐹) = 0 | ||
| Theorem | liminflelimsuplem 46459* | The superior limit is greater than or equal to the inferior limit. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑗 ∈ (𝑘[,)+∞)((𝐹 “ (𝑗[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*) ≠ ∅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘𝐹) ≤ (lim sup‘𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | liminflelimsup 46460* | The superior limit is greater than or equal to the inferior limit. The second hypothesis is needed (see liminflelimsupcex 46481 for a counterexample). The inequality can be strict, see liminfltlimsupex 46465. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑗 ∈ (𝑘[,)+∞)((𝐹 “ (𝑗[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*) ≠ ∅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘𝐹) ≤ (lim sup‘𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | limsupgtlem 46461* | For any positive real, the superior limit of F is larger than any of its values at large enough arguments, up to that positive real. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℝ+) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)((𝐹‘𝑘) − 𝑋) < (lim sup‘𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | limsupgt 46462* | Given a sequence of real numbers, there exists an upper part of the sequence that's appxoximated from below by the superior limit. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝐹 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℝ+) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)((𝐹‘𝑘) − 𝑋) < (lim sup‘𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | liminfresre 46463 | The inferior limit of a function only depends on the real part of its domain. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘(𝐹 ↾ ℝ)) = (lim inf‘𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | liminfresicompt 46464* | The inferior limit doesn't change when a function is restricted to the upper part of the reals. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝑀[,)+∞) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘(𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝑍) ↦ 𝐵)) = (lim inf‘(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | liminfltlimsupex 46465 | An example where the lim inf is strictly smaller than the lim sup. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(2 ∥ 𝑛, 0, 1)) ⇒ ⊢ (lim inf‘𝐹) < (lim sup‘𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | liminfgelimsup 46466* | The inferior limit is greater than or equal to the superior limit if and only if they are equal. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑗 ∈ (𝑘[,)+∞)((𝐹 “ (𝑗[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*) ≠ ∅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lim sup‘𝐹) ≤ (lim inf‘𝐹) ↔ (lim inf‘𝐹) = (lim sup‘𝐹))) | ||
| Theorem | liminfvalxr 46467* | Alternate definition of lim inf when 𝐹 is an extended real-valued function. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ*) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘𝐹) = -𝑒(lim sup‘(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ -𝑒(𝐹‘𝑥)))) | ||
| Theorem | liminfresuz 46468 | If the real part of the domain of a function is a subset of the integers, the inferior limit doesn't change when the function is restricted to an upper set of integers. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → dom (𝐹 ↾ ℝ) ⊆ ℤ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘(𝐹 ↾ 𝑍)) = (lim inf‘𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | liminflelimsupuz 46469 | The superior limit is greater than or equal to the inferior limit. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ*) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘𝐹) ≤ (lim sup‘𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | liminfvalxrmpt 46470* | Alternate definition of lim inf when 𝐹 is an extended real-valued function. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)) = -𝑒(lim sup‘(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ -𝑒𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | liminfresuz2 46471 | If the domain of a function is a subset of the integers, the inferior limit doesn't change when the function is restricted to an upper set of integers. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝐹 ⊆ ℤ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘(𝐹 ↾ 𝑍)) = (lim inf‘𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | liminfgelimsupuz 46472 | The inferior limit is greater than or equal to the superior limit if and only if they are equal. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ*) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lim sup‘𝐹) ≤ (lim inf‘𝐹) ↔ (lim inf‘𝐹) = (lim sup‘𝐹))) | ||
| Theorem | liminfval4 46473* | Alternate definition of lim inf when the given function is eventually real-valued. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ (𝑀[,)+∞))) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)) = -𝑒(lim sup‘(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ -𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | liminfval3 46474* | Alternate definition of lim inf when the given function is eventually extended real-valued. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ (𝑀[,)+∞))) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)) = -𝑒(lim sup‘(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ -𝑒𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | liminfequzmpt2 46475* | Two functions that are eventually equal to one another have the same superior limit. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐵 & ⊢ 𝐴 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (ℤ≥‘𝑁) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐾)) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘(𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶)) = (lim inf‘(𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | liminfvaluz 46476* | Alternate definition of lim inf for an extended real-valued function, defined on a set of upper integers. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘(𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ 𝐵)) = -𝑒(lim sup‘(𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ -𝑒𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | liminf0 46477 | The inferior limit of the empty set. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ (lim inf‘∅) = +∞ | ||
| Theorem | limsupval4 46478* | Alternate definition of lim inf when the given a function is eventually extended real-valued. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ (𝑀[,)+∞))) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)) = -𝑒(lim inf‘(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ -𝑒𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | liminfvaluz2 46479* | Alternate definition of lim inf for a real-valued function, defined on a set of upper integers. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘(𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ 𝐵)) = -𝑒(lim sup‘(𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ -𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | liminfvaluz3 46480* | Alternate definition of lim inf for an extended real-valued function, defined on a set of upper integers. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝐹 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ*) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘𝐹) = -𝑒(lim sup‘(𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ -𝑒(𝐹‘𝑘)))) | ||
| Theorem | liminflelimsupcex 46481 | A counterexample for liminflelimsup 46460, showing that the second hypothesis is needed. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ (lim sup‘∅) < (lim inf‘∅) | ||
| Theorem | limsupvaluz3 46482* | Alternate definition of lim inf for an extended real-valued function, defined on a set of upper integers. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘(𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ 𝐵)) = -𝑒(lim inf‘(𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ -𝑒𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | liminfvaluz4 46483* | Alternate definition of lim inf for a real-valued function, defined on a set of upper integers. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝐹 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘𝐹) = -𝑒(lim sup‘(𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ -(𝐹‘𝑘)))) | ||
| Theorem | limsupvaluz4 46484* | Alternate definition of lim inf for a real-valued function, defined on a set of upper integers. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘(𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ 𝐵)) = -𝑒(lim inf‘(𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ -𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | climliminflimsupd 46485 | If a sequence of real numbers converges, its inferior limit and its superior limit are equal. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝ ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘𝐹) = (lim sup‘𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | liminfreuzlem 46486* | Given a function on the reals, its inferior limit is real if and only if two condition holds: 1. there is a real number that is greater than or equal to the function, infinitely often; 2. there is a real number that is smaller than or equal to the function. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐹 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lim inf‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ∃𝑗 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑘)(𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝑥 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 𝑥 ≤ (𝐹‘𝑗)))) | ||
| Theorem | liminfreuz 46487* | Given a function on the reals, its inferior limit is real if and only if two condition holds: 1. there is a real number that is greater than or equal to the function, infinitely often; 2. there is a real number that is smaller than or equal to the function. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐹 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lim inf‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ∃𝑗 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑘)(𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝑥 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 𝑥 ≤ (𝐹‘𝑗)))) | ||
| Theorem | liminfltlem 46488* | Given a sequence of real numbers, there exists an upper part of the sequence that's approximated from above by the inferior limit. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℝ+) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(lim inf‘𝐹) < ((𝐹‘𝑘) + 𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | liminflt 46489* | Given a sequence of real numbers, there exists an upper part of the sequence that's approximated from above by the inferior limit. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝐹 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℝ+) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(lim inf‘𝐹) < ((𝐹‘𝑘) + 𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | climliminf 46490 | A sequence of real numbers converges if and only if it converges to its inferior limit. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝ ↔ 𝐹 ⇝ (lim inf‘𝐹))) | ||
| Theorem | liminflimsupclim 46491 | A sequence of real numbers converges if its inferior limit is real, and it is greater than or equal to the superior limit (in such a case, they are actually equal, see liminflelimsupuz 46469). (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) ≤ (lim inf‘𝐹)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝ ) | ||
| Theorem | climliminflimsup 46492 | A sequence of real numbers converges if and only if its inferior limit is real and it is greater than or equal to its superior limit (in such a case, they are actually equal, see liminfgelimsupuz 46472). (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝ ↔ ((lim inf‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ ∧ (lim sup‘𝐹) ≤ (lim inf‘𝐹)))) | ||
| Theorem | climliminflimsup2 46493 | A sequence of real numbers converges if and only if its superior limit is real and it is less than or equal to its inferior limit (in such a case, they are actually equal, see liminfgelimsupuz 46472). (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝ ↔ ((lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ ∧ (lim sup‘𝐹) ≤ (lim inf‘𝐹)))) | ||
| Theorem | climliminflimsup3 46494 | A sequence of real numbers converges if and only if its inferior limit is real and equal to its superior limit. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝ ↔ ((lim inf‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ ∧ (lim inf‘𝐹) = (lim sup‘𝐹)))) | ||
| Theorem | climliminflimsup4 46495 | A sequence of real numbers converges if and only if its superior limit is real and equal to its inferior limit. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝ ↔ ((lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ ∧ (lim inf‘𝐹) = (lim sup‘𝐹)))) | ||
| Theorem | limsupub2 46496* | A extended real valued function, with limsup that is not +∞, is eventually less than +∞. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Apr-2023.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐹 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ*) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) ≠ +∞) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 → (𝐹‘𝑗) < +∞)) | ||
| Theorem | limsupubuz2 46497* | A sequence with values in the extended reals, and with limsup that is not +∞, is eventually less than +∞. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Apr-2023.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐹 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ*) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) ≠ +∞) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑗 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑘)(𝐹‘𝑗) < +∞) | ||
| Theorem | xlimpnfxnegmnf 46498* | A sequence converges to +∞ if and only if its negation converges to -∞. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Apr-2023.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐹 & ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ*) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑗 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑘)𝑥 ≤ (𝐹‘𝑗) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑗 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑘)-𝑒(𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | liminflbuz2 46499* | A sequence with values in the extended reals, and with liminf that is not -∞, is eventually greater than -∞. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Apr-2023.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐹 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ*) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim inf‘𝐹) ≠ -∞) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑗 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑘)-∞ < (𝐹‘𝑗)) | ||
| Theorem | liminfpnfuz 46500* | The inferior limit of a function is +∞ if and only if every real number is the lower bound of the restriction of the function to a set of upper integers. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Apr-2023.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐹 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ*) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lim inf‘𝐹) = +∞ ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑗 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑘)𝑥 ≤ (𝐹‘𝑗))) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |