| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > anxordi | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Conjunction distributes over exclusive-or. In intuitionistic logic this assertion is also true, even though xordi 1024 does not necessarily hold, in part because the usual definition of xor is subtly different in intuitionistic logic. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 7-Oct-2018.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| anxordi | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ⊻ 𝜒)) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ⊻ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒))) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | xordi 1024 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ↔ ¬ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒))) | |
| 2 | df-xor 1519 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝜓 ⊻ 𝜒) ↔ ¬ (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) | |
| 3 | 2 | anbi2i 629 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ⊻ 𝜒)) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))) |
| 4 | df-xor 1519 | . 2 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ⊻ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)) ↔ ¬ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒))) | |
| 5 | 1, 3, 4 | 3bitr4i 304 | 1 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ⊻ 𝜒)) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ⊻ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒))) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 ↔ wb 207 ∧ wa 396 ⊻ wxo 1518 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 208 df-an 397 df-xor 1519 |
| This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |