| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > anxordi | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Conjunction distributes over exclusive-or. In intuitionistic logic this assertion is also true, even though xordi 1032 does not necessarily hold, in part because the usual definition of xor is subtly different in intuitionistic logic. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 7-Oct-2018.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| anxordi | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ⊻ 𝜒)) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ⊻ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒))) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | xordi 1032 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ↔ ¬ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒))) | |
| 2 | df-xor 1535 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝜓 ⊻ 𝜒) ↔ ¬ (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) | |
| 3 | 2 | anbi2i 634 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ⊻ 𝜒)) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))) |
| 4 | df-xor 1535 | . 2 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ⊻ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)) ↔ ¬ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒))) | |
| 5 | 1, 3, 4 | 3bitr4i 306 | 1 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ⊻ 𝜒)) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ⊻ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒))) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 ↔ wb 209 ∧ wa 400 ⊻ wxo 1534 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 401 df-xor 1535 |
| This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |