| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > anxordi | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Conjunction distributes over exclusive-or. In intuitionistic logic this assertion is also true, even though xordi 1029 does not necessarily hold, in part because the usual definition of xor is subtly different in intuitionistic logic. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 7-Oct-2018.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| anxordi | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ⊻ 𝜒)) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ⊻ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒))) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | xordi 1029 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ↔ ¬ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒))) | |
| 2 | df-xor 1531 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝜓 ⊻ 𝜒) ↔ ¬ (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) | |
| 3 | 2 | anbi2i 632 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ⊻ 𝜒)) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))) |
| 4 | df-xor 1531 | . 2 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ⊻ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)) ↔ ¬ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒))) | |
| 5 | 1, 3, 4 | 3bitr4i 305 | 1 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ⊻ 𝜒)) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ⊻ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒))) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 ↔ wb 208 ∧ wa 399 ⊻ wxo 1530 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 209 df-an 400 df-xor 1531 |
| This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |