Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > ax12i | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Inference that has ax-12 2171 (without ∀𝑦) as its conclusion. Uses only Tarski's FOL axiom schemes. The hypotheses may be eliminable without using ax-12 2171 in special cases. Proof similar to Lemma 16 of [Tarski] p. 70. (Contributed by NM, 20-May-2008.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
ax12i.1 | ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) |
ax12i.2 | ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
ax12i | ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | ax12i.1 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | |
2 | ax12i.2 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) | |
3 | 1 | biimprcd 249 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑)) |
4 | 2, 3 | alrimih 1826 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑)) |
5 | 1, 4 | syl6bi 252 | 1 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 205 ∀wal 1537 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1798 ax-4 1812 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 |
This theorem is referenced by: ax12wlem 2128 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |