| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > ecase3ad | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Deduction for elimination by cases. (Contributed by NM, 24-May-2013.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 20-Sep-2024.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| ecase3ad.1 | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃)) |
| ecase3ad.2 | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) |
| ecase3ad.3 | ⊢ (𝜑 → ((¬ 𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜒) → 𝜃)) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| ecase3ad | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ecase3ad.1 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃)) | |
| 2 | 1 | imp 406 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃) |
| 3 | ecase3ad.2 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) | |
| 4 | 3 | imp 406 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) |
| 5 | ecase3ad.3 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((¬ 𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜒) → 𝜃)) | |
| 6 | 5 | imp 406 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (¬ 𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜒)) → 𝜃) |
| 7 | 2, 4, 6 | pm2.61ddan 813 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ∧ wa 395 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 |
| This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |