Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > ecase3ad | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Deduction for elimination by cases. (Contributed by NM, 24-May-2013.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 20-Sep-2024.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
ecase3ad.1 | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃)) |
ecase3ad.2 | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) |
ecase3ad.3 | ⊢ (𝜑 → ((¬ 𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜒) → 𝜃)) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
ecase3ad | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | ecase3ad.1 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃)) | |
2 | 1 | imp 407 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃) |
3 | ecase3ad.2 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) | |
4 | 3 | imp 407 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) |
5 | ecase3ad.3 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((¬ 𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜒) → 𝜃)) | |
6 | 5 | imp 407 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (¬ 𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜒)) → 𝜃) |
7 | 2, 4, 6 | pm2.61ddan 811 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ∧ wa 396 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 397 |
This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |