| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > just2-df | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Second justification theorem for definitions whose definiens is a conjunction, as in df-sb 2085. If 𝜑 is equivalent to (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒), then it implies (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒). In the case of df-sb 2085, this expresses the invariance of the definition under alpha-renaming of the bound variable. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 6-Jun-2026.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| just2-df.1 | ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| just2-df | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | just2-df.1 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) | |
| 2 | abab 835 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 ∧ (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))) | |
| 3 | 1, 2 | bitri 277 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))) |
| 4 | 3 | simprbi 500 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 208 ∧ wa 398 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 209 df-an 399 |
| This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |