Theorem mt2bi 363

Description: A false consequent falsifies an antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 12-Nov-2012.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
mt2bi.1	⊢ 𝜑

Assertion

Ref	Expression
mt2bi	⊢ (¬ 𝜓 ↔ (𝜓 → ¬ 𝜑))

Proof of Theorem mt2bi

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		mt2bi.1	. . 3 ⊢ 𝜑
2	1	a1bi 362	. 2 ⊢ (¬ 𝜓 ↔ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓))
3		con2b 359	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜓 → ¬ 𝜑))
4	2, 3	bitri 274	1 ⊢ (¬ 𝜓 ↔ (𝜓 → ¬ 𝜑))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206

This theorem is referenced by: (None)