| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > stoic2b | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Stoic logic Thema 2 version b. See stoic2a 1807. Version b is with the phrase "or both". We already have this rule as mpd3an3 1491, so here we prove the equivalence and discourage its use. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 17-Feb-2019.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| stoic2b.1 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) |
| stoic2b.2 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| stoic2b | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | stoic2b.1 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) | |
| 2 | stoic2b.2 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) | |
| 3 | 1, 2 | mpd3an3 1491 | 1 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| This proof depends on syntax axioms: → wi 4 ∧ wa 401 ∧ w3a 1103 |
| This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 |
| This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 402 df-3an 1105 |
| This theorem is used by: (None) |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |