Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > stoic4a | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Stoic logic Thema 4
version a. Statement T4 of [Bobzien] p. 117
shows a
reconstructed version of Stoic logic Thema 4: "When from two
assertibles a third follows, and from the third and one (or both) of the
two and one (or more) external assertible(s) another follows, then this
other follows from the first two and the external(s)."
We use 𝜃 to represent the "external" assertibles. This is version a, which is without the phrase "or both"; see stoic4b 1785 for the version with the phrase "or both". (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 17-Feb-2019.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
stoic4a.1 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) |
stoic4a.2 | ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
stoic4a | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | stoic4a.1 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) | |
2 | 1 | 3adant3 1133 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜒) |
3 | simp1 1137 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜑) | |
4 | simp3 1139 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜃) | |
5 | stoic4a.2 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) | |
6 | 2, 3, 4, 5 | syl3anc 1372 | 1 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 399 ∧ w3a 1088 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 400 df-3an 1090 |
This theorem is referenced by: pnpcan 11004 relogbexp 25518 repnpcan 39944 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |