Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > stoic4a | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Stoic logic Thema 4
version a. Statement T4 of [Bobzien] p. 117
shows a
reconstructed version of Stoic logic Thema 4: "When from two
assertibles a third follows, and from the third and one (or both) of the
two and one (or more) external assertible(s) another follows, then this
other follows from the first two and the external(s)."
We use 𝜃 to represent the "external" assertibles. This is version a, which is without the phrase "or both"; see stoic4b 1781 for the version with the phrase "or both". (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 17-Feb-2019.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
stoic4a.1 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) |
stoic4a.2 | ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
stoic4a | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | stoic4a.1 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) | |
2 | 1 | 3adant3 1131 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜒) |
3 | simp1 1135 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜑) | |
4 | simp3 1137 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜃) | |
5 | stoic4a.2 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) | |
6 | 2, 3, 4, 5 | syl3anc 1370 | 1 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 396 ∧ w3a 1086 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 397 df-3an 1088 |
This theorem is referenced by: pnpcan 11260 relogbexp 25930 repnpcan 40375 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |