| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > stoic4a | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Stoic logic Thema 4
version a. Statement T4 of [Bobzien] p. 117
shows a
reconstructed version of Stoic logic Thema 4: "When from two
assertibles a third follows, and from the third and one (or both) of the
two and one (or more) external assertible(s) another follows, then this
other follows from the first two and the external(s)."
We use 𝜃 to represent the "external" assertibles. This is version a, which is without the phrase "or both"; see stoic4b 1808 for the version with the phrase "or both". (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 17-Feb-2019.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| stoic4a.1 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) |
| stoic4a.2 | ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| stoic4a | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | stoic4a.1 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) | |
| 2 | 1 | 3adant3 1150 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜒) |
| 3 | simp1 1154 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜑) | |
| 4 | simp3 1156 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜃) | |
| 5 | stoic4a.2 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) | |
| 6 | 2, 3, 4, 5 | syl3anc 1398 | 1 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| This proof depends on syntax axioms: → wi 4 ∧ wa 400 ∧ w3a 1103 |
| This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 |
| This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 401 df-3an 1105 |
| This theorem is used by: pnpcan 11501 relogbexp 26954 repnpcan 43181 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |