| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > stoic4a | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Stoic logic Thema 4
version a. Statement T4 of [Bobzien] p. 117
shows a
reconstructed version of Stoic logic Thema 4: "When from two
assertibles a third follows, and from the third and one (or both) of the
two and one (or more) external assertible(s) another follows, then this
other follows from the first two and the external(s)."
We use 𝜃 to represent the "external" assertibles. This is version a, which is without the phrase "or both"; see stoic4b 1805 for the version with the phrase "or both". (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 17-Feb-2019.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| stoic4a.1 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) |
| stoic4a.2 | ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| stoic4a | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | stoic4a.1 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) | |
| 2 | 1 | 3adant3 1148 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜒) |
| 3 | simp1 1152 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜑) | |
| 4 | simp3 1154 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜃) | |
| 5 | stoic4a.2 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) | |
| 6 | 2, 3, 4, 5 | syl3anc 1396 | 1 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 400 ∧ w3a 1101 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 401 df-3an 1103 |
| This theorem is referenced by: pnpcan 11497 relogbexp 26911 repnpcan 43077 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |