Theorem csbiebg 3176

Description: Bidirectional conversion between an implicit class substitution hypothesis x = A -> B = C and its explicit substitution equivalent. (Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
csbiebg.2	|- F/_xC

Assertion

Ref	Expression
csbiebg	|- (A e. V -> (A.x(x = A -> B = C) <-> [_A / x]_B = C))

Distinct variable group:   x,A

Allowed substitution hints:   B(x)   C(x)   V(x)

Proof of Theorem csbiebg

Dummy variable a is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqeq2 2362	. . . 4 |- (a = A -> (x = a <-> x = A))
2	1	imbi1d 308	. . 3 |- (a = A -> ((x = a -> B = C) <-> (x = A -> B = C)))
3	2	albidv 1625	. 2 |- (a = A -> (A.x(x = a -> B = C) <-> A.x(x = A -> B = C)))
4		csbeq1 3140	. . 3 |- (a = A -> [_a / x]_B = [_A / x]_B)
5	4	eqeq1d 2361	. 2 |- (a = A -> ([_a / x]_B = C <-> [_A / x]_B = C))
6		vex 2863	. . 3 |- a e. _V
7		csbiebg.2	. . 3 |- F/_xC
8	6, 7	csbieb 3175	. 2 |- (A.x(x = a -> B = C) <-> [_a / x]_B = C)
9	3, 5, 8	vtoclbg 2916	1 |- (A e. V -> (A.x(x = A -> B = C) <-> [_A / x]_B = C))

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   <-> wb 176  A.wal 1540   = wceq 1642   e. wcel 1710   F/_wnfc 2477  [_csb 3137

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1546  ax-5 1557  ax-17 1616  ax-9 1654  ax-8 1675  ax-6 1729  ax-7 1734  ax-11 1746  ax-12 1925  ax-ext 2334

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 177  df-or 359  df-an 360  df-3an 936  df-tru 1319  df-ex 1542  df-nf 1545  df-sb 1649  df-clab 2340  df-cleq 2346  df-clel 2349  df-nfc 2479  df-v 2862  df-sbc 3048  df-csb 3138

This theorem is referenced by: (None)