Theorem spimvw 1669

Description: Specialization. Lemma 8 of [KalishMontague] p. 87. Uses only Tarski's FOL axiom schemes. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-2017.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
spimvw.1	|- (x = y -> (ph -> ps))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
spimvw	|- (A.xph -> ps)

Distinct variable groups:   x,y   ps,x

Allowed substitution hints:   ph(x, y)   ps(y)

Proof of Theorem spimvw

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ax-17 1616	. 2 |- (-. ps -> A.x -. ps)
2		spimvw.1	. 2 |- (x = y -> (ph -> ps))
3	1, 2	spimw 1668	1 |- (A.xph -> ps)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  -. wn 3   -> wi 4  A.wal 1540

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1546  ax-5 1557  ax-17 1616  ax-9 1654

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 177  df-an 360  df-ex 1542

This theorem is used by:  cbvalivw  1674  spw  1694  alcomiw  1704