Theorem spimw 1668

Description: Specialization. Lemma 8 of [KalishMontague] p. 87. Uses only Tarski's FOL axiom schemes. (Contributed by NM, 19-Apr-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 7-Aug-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
spimw.1	|- (-. ps -> A.x -. ps)
spimw.2	|- (x = y -> (ph -> ps))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
spimw	|- (A.xph -> ps)

Distinct variable group:   x,y

Allowed substitution hints:   ph(x, y)   ps(x, y)

Proof of Theorem spimw

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ax9v 1655	. 2 |- -. A.x -. x = y
2		spimw.1	. . 3 |- (-. ps -> A.x -. ps)
3		spimw.2	. . 3 |- (x = y -> (ph -> ps))
4	2, 3	spimfw 1646	. 2 |- (-. A.x -. x = y -> (A.xph -> ps))
5	1, 4	ax-mp 5	1 |- (A.xph -> ps)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  -. wn 3   -> wi 4  A.wal 1540

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1546  ax-5 1557  ax-9 1654

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 177  df-an 360  df-ex 1542

This theorem is used by:  spimvw  1669  spnfw  1670  cbvaliw  1673  spfw  1691